Inception Review

Review: Christopher Nolan’s newest movie Inception blows away the summer competition with a film that may not be perfect, but is pretty close to it.

If you have any plans on seeing Christopher Nolan’s mind-bending new movie, you should do so quickly, because this is sure to be the type of movie that has people standing around the metaphorical water cooler and discussing it- especially the ending.

Let me start out by saying that Inception is one of the best movies I have seen this year, and ranks among the best movies I have seen over the last few years. Don’t be fooled by the fact that I am a tech guy with deep sci-fi leanings which might make you think that I would be predisposed to liking this movie anyway. Nolan’s sci-fi slanted, trippy, mind-blowing film is certain to be the type of movie that won’t be easily defined, and will appeal to fans of any genre. Years from now, video stores (assuming there are any video stores left years from now) will likely have to think long and hard about whether to label this movie as sci-fi, action, or even drama before assigning it a place on the shelves. It is a movie that defies easy analysis, but still manages to entertain.

Inception is Nolan’s reward for the success of the Batman films. Without the critical and commercial success of his previous blockbusters, it is hard to imagine a studio shelling out the kind of money that Warner Bros. handed over to Nolan for what is essentially a passion project- roughly $160 million. By comparison, 2008’s The Dark Knight cost $185 million and it was a tested franchise with massive buzz even before the script was finished. Inception is a different kind of animal.

It must have been an interesting pitch to Warner Bros. studio heads. Nolan likely went in and said something along the lines of “I have this idea. It’s a movie about a group that can go into dreams and steal ideas, but the subject can fight back and destroy the dream world. Oh, and I need around a $150 million.“ Once the puzzled looks and taunting laughs subsided, someone probably reminded them that Nolan had just grossed over $1 billion with The Dark Knight, and that was that.

With Inception, Nolan did exactly what he intended, received the exact performances from some of this generations best actors and actresses, and created a movie that will likely generate Oscar buzz. Not everyone will agree, and some people are likely to seriously hate parts of this movie, but those voices are likely to disappear beneath the avalanche of well deserved praise that Inception is likely to garner.

As to what Inception is all about, this review will be spoiler free, but if you want to be completely in the dark about the story, you might want to stop reading here and skip down two paragraphs. In some ways, it is very much like The Matrix- not so much in the story (although there are a few similarities), just in the sense that to explain the world of Inception robs a bit of the fun from the movie, and undermines the deliberately vague nature of the trailers that have managed to walk the thin line between giving away too much, and still being appealing. Most people going into the movie have only a vague idea about what they are about to see, so if you wish your eyes to remain completely virgin, scroll down past the next two paragraphs.

At its heart, behind the fancy sets and the insane worlds, Inception is a heist movie. Or at least, that is the driving force behind the plot. Leonardo DiCaprio (Titanic, Shutter Island) plays Cobb, the Extractor, a man who enters other people’s dreams to steal their secrets. Cobb is hired to steal the secrets of Saito, played by Ken Watanabe (The Last Samurai, Letters From Iwo Jima) , a businessman that turns the tables on Cobb, and then hires him for never-done-before job of  inception- the planting of an idea in a subject’s mind. Cobb accepts the job based on a promise from Saito, who tells him that he is able to make a murder charge against Cobb disappear so he can return to his family.

Cobb then sets out to form his team that consists of Joseph Gordon-Levitt (500 Days of Summer, GI Joe) as Arthur, the point man, Ellen Page (Juno, Smart People) as Ariadne, the architect, Tom Hardy (Star Trek: Nemesis, the upcoming Mad Max: Fury Road) as Eames, the forger, and Dileep Rao (Avatar, Drag Me To Hell) as Yusuf, the chemist. Together the group is tasked with implanting an idea in the mind of Robert Fischer, Jr., played by Cillian Murphy (28 Days Later, Sunshine), the son of an energy baron, and Saito’s main rival. The story takes an unexpected turn, when Cobb’s wife Mal, played by Marion Cotillard (La Vie En Rose, Public Enemies), continues to haunt Cobb’s dreams.

Ok, everyone back with me now? Good. It will be somewhat shocking if Inception is not nominated for several technical awards, including best special effects. There might be movies coming later this year that will be comparable, but it is hard to imagine anything surpassing the visual masterpiece that Nolan presents. Each scene seems to top the last, and people will probably be talking about Gordon-Leavitt’s zero-g fight for a while to come.

Another Oscar nod is likely to come in the form of best original screenplay. Hollywood isn’t exactly known for taking huge risks, as most of the biggest budgets go to sequels and adaptations of existing properties. If nothing else, Inception is remarkable for the fact that it is incredibly original. Everything on the screen is unique. If you are a fan of movies in general, you owe it to yourself to watch Inception for that simple fact alone. Even people that end up hating this movie will likely applaud its originality.  The movie succeeds on so many levels that it would be nice- albeit somewhat naive- to think that studios and other filmmakers might see the benefits of green lighting more movies like this that are based on original ideas.

That doesn’t mean that this movie is perfect. As much as it pains me to say, there are a few flaws in Nolan’s diamond. The ending is likely to split some people. It makes you think and question what you have just seen, which some people will love, and others hate. For the record, I absolutely loved it, but it is possible that others won’t. The biggest problem, however, comes from the character of Cobb’s wife, Mal.

Without spoiling anything, which is difficult because the truth about her character becomes a vital piece of the plot as well as the character of Cobb, the character of Mal is based upon the emotions she is intended to illicit. She is designed to  help you relate and connect to the character of Cobb, but her scenes are few and far between, and she is little more than a plot device at times. In some parts, this is deliberate, but in the instances that the audience are meant to connect to her- and by proxy to Cobb- it just falls a bit flat.

If Nolan has a flaw in his work, it is his representation of women in movies. In both Batman films, the character of Rachel Dawes, whether she was played by Katie Holmes or Maggie Gyllenhaal, could almost have been entirely removed from the films and neither movie would have suffered- not counting the plot elements the character effects. Two-Face would not have been possible without the character of Dawes, but beyond that there isn’t much to her. It is the same in The Prestige, where the women are all used to further the plot and add to the surprise ending, and I will give a dollar to anyone who can remember anything that Hillary Swank did in Insomnia. Even in Momento, Carrie-Anne Moss is only there to support the story. The talented Ellen Page also seems to be in Inception more to help the audience by asking questions of Cobb, than to stand on her own. You never really understand her reasons or motivations, and beyond her interaction with Cobb, she has very little to do with the movie.

But that is all nitpicking, something that is easy to do with Inception simply because it is the type of movie that will stick with you for quite awhile and make you think. Odds are, a good deal of the business for this movie will come from repeat viewings. I am already thinking about when I can go again.

This is the movie Nolan wanted to make, and yet again, he proves why he is one of the most respected filmmakers working today. It might be a bit of a long shot, but there is a very real chance that Nolan will receive an Oscar-nomination for the best director, and he could even win. He deserves it. Overall, Inception is HIGHLY recommended.

The Good

Almost everything. The visuals, the acting, the direction, and the incredible originality. The technical side is also stellar, from the music, to the sound effects. The ending that will have some people raving.

The Bad

Some under developed characters, especially with the women. The plot sometimes gives way to the visuals. The ending that will have some people screaming.

Showing 70 comments

  1. GemD at 5:49pm 27th December 2010 A movie is a movie... there for enjoyment purposes only. If you didnt enjoy it, then you didnt. If you did, then you did... not rocket science here. For those who didnt enjoy it, then I am sorry you didnt, but for those who did, dont get hung up on what others may think. You get what you want from the movie... light hearted entertainment, thought provoking moments, or deep moments of the unknown .... but what ever it is you take away from watching the movie, it is your opinion. And any opinion is to be shared, but not imposed on others. If nothing else, whether you loved it orhated it, you have to give credit where credit is due... the effects were cool.
  2. Dante at 2:56pm 17th December 2010 The story in this film is nonsense. Total unrealistic. Therefore the film is boring, a waste of time. The effect however is good, but it's not worth to spend so much time just to look at cool effects.
  3. jody pattison at 5:51am 17th November 2010 amazing film best i have seen in years....
  4. paulo at 1:47pm 1st November 2010 I love Inception. Definately my favourite movie at all time. I have just pre-ordered the DVD with a huge 40% discount from: http://www.InceptionDVD.org.uk
  5. Someone at 4:19pm 2nd October 2010 This movie. Is. Superb. Watch it, hate it or love it. That's all it is. Love or hate.
  6. Joe at 10:53am 10th September 2010 I saw this movie partly on the basis of your review. If this is the current state of moviemaking - and reviewing- in this country at this time, we are in more artistic and cultural trouble than we can imagine. COUNT ME OUT!!!
  7. haley at 8:43am 8th September 2010 seriously why do people hate movies when they cant understand it? inception was fantastic and im sorry if you didnt like it because you couldnt understand it dumb asses
    1. brushman at 1:28pm 9th September 2010 You have some explaining to do.
  8. brushman at 3:01pm 6th September 2010 Imagine something very complex, confusing. Something that doesn't actually make logical sense to begin with. Now, imagine a man with the vocabulary of an adult and the brain of a mentally disabled child trying to explain this to you. That is the embodiment of this movie. The movie tries to use complex scientific descriptions to explain what's going on but just makes a fool out of itself. It reminds me of the power rangers. "Rangers, I have synthesized for you a new device, the quantum electrode magnifying gravity pulsar. It works by capturing pulses from distant neutron stars and distributing them throughout the first dimension..." Interpret this film however you want. There's no right or wrong. It is a "thought-provoking film" for the "intelligent". You'll always find a way to twist it into *reality*. Ha ha ha. At least I enjoyed one part of the movie. The scene where Cobb tests Ellen Page (what was her characters name again...?) Draw a maze and your in... I guess being an architect is that easy. While everyone was oohing and aaing I couldn't help but laugh. Oh well. Another part I enjoyed was when they were on the bridge in the van. That poor guy was shooting at the van for nearly 20 minutes. Maybe he was shooting blanks? In all seriousness, the action scenes were good, and the overall idea of the movie had potential. But, for the most part, the rest was trash.
    1. Robert at 11:50am 13th November 2010 whell brushman.....it can be seen from your review that you are a very very very demanding person and frankly I can't think of how hard job your wife will have pleasing your over damanding and prety much complicated and childlish wishes and desires......Im actualy feeling allmost sory for you...
  9. Tayy at 7:58am 5th September 2010 I hated it.
    1. Dante at 2:58pm 17th December 2010 You're not alone. The film is crap! Waste of time. How can someone spend so much money on a film with such an unrealistic and boring story?
  10. chad at 8:46am 16th August 2010 when they refer to, whos dreaming what?, and who dreams each level... i dont get it.. i mean there ALL dreaming arent they? whoever goes to sleep is dreaming. if there all in the same dream, whats to distinguish whos dream it is? which brings me to the obsurdity of this whole movie in the first place: several people cant be in one dream!!! nor do levels of dreaming exist. none of the things in this movie could ever happen. even if they could make fischer dream he should destroy his company, that would never influence his actions in real life!! has anyone ever dreamt they could fly like superman, and then wake up and go diving off a building? ; well i just dreamt i could fly so lets go flying...." this whole movie is ridiculous...
    1. just_think at 3:36pm 16th August 2010 Destroying a company doesn't break any laws of physics. The concept that an idea (or should I say plausible idea) can be planted deep inside your subconscious seems valid.
    2. Martin at 7:17am 1st November 2010 Nope, sorry, but dreams do have levels. As soon as you drift off to sleep your mind wanders and you are dreaming. Then you enter REM sleep which has vivid dreams. REM means Rapid Eye Movement: you think what is taking place in the dream is real so you are looking around to get information about your surroundings. Last night I remember I was dreaming and then I realized I was dreaming so the dream ended abruptly but I didn't wake up: I continued to dream but now I knew that it was dreaming and I was able to wake up when it was time to get up. When I was a child I also remember having a dream and wanting to wake up, fearing that it was time to get up and I'd be late for school. Personally, I found that the more I fought to wake up the more I was accepting the reality of the dream so the key was to go to sleep in my dream and then wake up in reality. But guess what: sometimes I would "wake up" and I'd still be dreaming: there'd be hints that I was still dreaming like the fact that my feet didn't touch the floor as I was "walking". I remember one time I actually "woke up" twice: the second time I realized I was still dreaming I woke up abruptly which is why I remember the whole experience. Anyway, the research into REM sleep combined with the experiences of people who have experienced similar dreams are probably what inspired Nolan's screenplay. Oh and I even had a dream in which I aged several years in one night so the idea that more time passes in your dream is plausible. Of course, I simply woke from that dream, which is why I remembered it so it wasn't a "deep dream state". The dreams people have when they are in deep REM sleep most people don't remember, not unless they are suddenly woken up (although sometimes I do remember dreams later when I am awake: I will dream something the night before and something similar would happen the next day and I'd get a feeling of deja vu... which is probably why ancient people thought dreams could foretell the future). Oh and I did die once in a dream and I did wake up. Like I said, going to sleep in a dream ends the dream.
  11. sciencestr at 6:41am 15th August 2010 i liked the movie alot. it really made you think, and it had an excellent story line.
  12. dredre at 7:29am 14th August 2010 For people who didn't like/understand/enjoy this movie: Sorry, but the trailer should have mentioned you need a minimum IQ of 80 for admittance. I'm seeing it again. They get more money from me, and it's well deserved. Nuff said.
  13. Norrin Radd at 3:12am 13th August 2010 As someone with a background in comic books and Sci fi, i lthought the movie was awesome. I must say i have only seen it once but there seems to be a lot of subtle touches that i look forward to uncovering on repeat viewings. There are also questions like why are "the projections" such lame ass marksmen? hmmm.....Why is the aspect of Mal so powerful? Why does everybody come out fine in the end? Questions that may not have an answer is no bad thing. We seem to have a constant need to know everything so it's refreshing to watch a movie and have a multitude of different questions at the end. I prefer movies to instigate discussion (like any art) and thus I welcome both the negative and positive comments . However, If you go to the movies to be pampered, and the need to concentrate is a chore, watch Toy story 3 (I will do so to at some point). If however you want to experience something Innovative, intelligent, thought provoking and just generally cool, I couldn't recommend another movie more highly. Just as Memento did previously, Inception has proved Nolan has a knack of originality in movies, which is a rarity and should be praised.
  14. Couj00 at 2:10pm 7th August 2010 For you tatisample, I thank you some one who paid attention
  15. Couj00 at 2:05pm 7th August 2010 This one is for bungled , for you to go down the road with the comment that you made just shows you didn't understand the movie at all. It was a great film, with 3 possible meanings to the end of the film it was geniuse and well put together all the way around.
  16. Liz M at 11:55am 4th August 2010 By the way, the seriously is meant to be sarcastic.
  17. Liz M at 11:54am 4th August 2010 Fantastic Movie!!!!!!!!! Seriously!!!!!
  18. Jamaima at 11:51am 4th August 2010 ..driving the van.
  19. Jamaima at 11:50am 4th August 2010 Ur*gh|!@!! Give us a break. The guys who are using words like "great", "awesome", "best" , "fantastic" amazing" just want people not to think that they are not intelligent. I mean, come on guys, leornardo could have done much better. The movie sucks. You could even tell the actors were bored themselves!!! The only good thing about the movie was the guy driving the (whatever his name was).
  20. Norbert at 12:26am 3rd August 2010 Testing very boring movie it was an amusement park ride with all the razzle dazzle but the ride wasnt fun. It was built way so therfore movie critics and their normal pretentious style of writing will be stigmatized to say bad things about it. I would neverr see this movie again I hated watching it, it was way too long too puzzling on purpose so therfore I close my mind to it and see what the ride feels like. I agree with all the negative things said about this movie, it was like confusing poetry for the pleasure of the writer.
    1. mikhail at 7:20am 4th December 2010 u crazy ass u r all wrong my friend it was thought provoking mind bending and an excellent action thriller mystery movie..... ur just jealous that this might win best movie at the oscars, best director and best actor....... plz stop being so negative
  21. zenhowie at 2:17am 2nd August 2010 Boring. Bad guys with automatic weapons what can hit someone 8' in front of them but the good guys kill with one shot. Just more mind numbing special effects. Twelve year old boys and those that have to rave about films when they are told they must, will all say how awesome it is.
    1. Chris at 4:01pm 6th August 2010 I guess their was too much going on for you to keep up with. You should probably just stick to westerns. By the way, any cop will tell you, people use automatic weapons because they can't hit what they're aiming at.
  22. J. Sz. at 1:31am 2nd August 2010 One of the most stupid movies ever created; who ever made this garbage must be an idiot also. Meaning less, confusing with that jumping stories build like pyramids, and way to loud. Just wasted my time and money, don't even worth a "PENNY" And this garbage call the best movie, give me a break, my 6yrs old grand daughter make a much better then this piece of S***???
    1. E.S.L at 2:42am 7th August 2010 this movie is by far the best that's come out this year. maybe you didn't like the movie because you didn't understand the complexity of it seeing as your english isn't very good...maybe you and your 6 year old granddaughter should have watched a movie that's more on your standards...say toy story 3?
  23. bruce lee at 1:29am 2nd August 2010 inception is a great film that at its core showcases the futile human attempt to play God and the messy outcome that tends to ensue. By manipulating dreams and implanting ideas Cobb and his cohorts find a way of taking away the God given right of free will thereby altering reality to suit their machinations. dreams are useful only in so far as they affect reality so by manipulating one's dreams we can invariably manipulate his reality as well but there is a human element that makes the desire to play God result in disastrous consquences which is why Cobb's over indulgence in dream manipulation threatened to shatter his life. Nolan has once again triumphed in his attempt to blur the lines between reality and illusion,the real and the unreal making it difficult for the viewer to detect the coherence of his narrative after one simple viewing. An ingenuous filmmaker who doesnt rely on 3D to capture the imagination of filmgoers.
    1. jesus christ at 2:43am 7th August 2010 this movie has nothing to do with god, don't try to pull religion into EVERYTHING let it be what it is
      1. babooshka at 7:12pm 14th August 2010 I'm not sure bruce WAS bringing religion into it- the word 'god' can just refer to the idea of having complete control over an area, with the ability to create etc. And this movie DID have aspects of god-like powers, I mean they created whole cities and worlds.
  24. tatisample at 6:32pm 1st August 2010 Towards the beginning of the movie Ariadne the college student was told that she had to have her own "totem" and that no one else was to know the weight of it besides her, so that she would know when she was dreaming or not, and know who's dream she was in (or something to that effect.) Cobbs though took his wife's totem from her safe. They also said in the movie that safes were used in peoples dreams to hide secrets and special information. If Cobbs totem was taken from his wife's safe, wouldn't that mean that the totem he had was a "dream totem"? Another thing I noticed was that Cobbs never had his own totem. Could it be that he never had a wife but instead created one in his mind? Or that after his 50 dream yrs with his wife he went so deep in the dreamworld that it became his reality? O.o
  25. Diana Freedman at 3:16pm 1st August 2010 If you’re still confused about the levels and “kicks”, I’ve created an infographic visualizing the mission: http://ustandout.com/free-designs/inception-expla.... My theory is that Cobb’s “limbo” is really another dream level, and that Cobb finds Saito in the actual limbo (which is the reason Saito is old while Cobb is not; Saito got to limbo first).
  26. Jackie at 3:06pm 1st August 2010 One of the best movies i've ever seen PERIOD. but here's a tip if any of you, which i'm pretty sure you are, are to watch the movie again. Notice that when he's dreaming, he has his wedding ring on and when he's awake in reality he's not wearing it. I believe that was proven in the beginning. But in the end scene where he gets to see his children, i'm not exactly sure if he was wearing his ring or not. So i might even watch it again for the 3rd time just to look out for that. Just maybe that'd help us figure out whether everything was a dream or not. Let me know what you think!
  27. Sam at 5:48pm 30th July 2010 If you have a problem with thinking about a film while you're watching it, you should bring more to the theater than your ass. Anyone troubled that a film doesn't end with the bad guys getting caught or a kick in the nuts will not like this. In fact, they will not try to understand it and just fall asleep to dream of a cartoon character wearing a cowboy hat.
    1. Kevin at 1:59pm 7th August 2010 THAT was brilliant. Totally agree!
  28. Ray at 9:36pm 27th July 2010 OK. Well hard to argue with some of the comments, however, overall, I really enjoyed it and left a bit confused at the end which was no doubt by design to keep up guessing and talking about it. So lets just put it to a vote. Judging from the fact that the kids have the same clothes on as through the movie and are aparently the same age, and based on the last scene with Mal, Is Cobb still dreaming? There is probably enough evidence to argue either way. He does not just apear, he knows how he got to the last scene because we go with him every step of the way. He sees the faces. The call is made to allow free passage. But what about Mals waring that he is still dreaming and just doesn't know it? what about the fact that the kids have not aged or even changed their clothes? What about the fact that the top is still spinning? Why isn't anyone talking about the end?
    1. sophie at 6:31am 28th July 2010 Ray, your on the right track. I'm pretty sure the ending was that he was dreaming the whole time, and his wife was right? Because of what you've mentioned with the children not changing ,and also how he saw their faces. And, how the top was spinning at the end. And, i think it was saying that it didn't matter whether it was reality or not, because reality is just a perspective, it explores dream and reality and the fine line. It says a lot in the movie how there are different realitys, and possibly that he wanted to see his children was the reality he chose with. I'm going to see it a few more times, but that's my guess.
    2. gen at 5:17am 2nd August 2010 the top is still spinning because he is still dreaming, the kids are still in the same clothes, they don't show how hw got to his house, it could be part of his dreamworld and the kids and his dad are projections, they are not real, he never woke up, he stayed out of guilt or maybe he just never made it out trying to get the old man. Unless the top eventually did fall but we will never know.
      1. James at 1:44pm 14th December 2010 There may be another explanation. After re-watching the movie I notcied something. Remember how when he was explaining the whole "totem" thing to the young new architect and said that it was Mal's "totem,"? I thought that he said everyone was supposed to have their own, and yet he's using his wifes? Doesn't add. Pay close attention and you'll notice that, and this may be me over thinking it here, whenever he's in a dream, he has his wedding band on, and when he's in "reality" he doesn't... Weird. So if we are to go by that rationale, then at the end he has no wedding band on, and therefore it's reality.
        1. Cesar Vargas at 8:19am 20th February 2011 James, what you are saying is partially true. Cobb would handle Mal's totem as the tangible memory of her while she is still in Cobb's mind. Now, what I think is that the totem was obviously not Mal's totem but what really was his totem was his children. The guilt of leaving them is scarred in his mind and the guilt would always express his kids leaving Cob before he can see their faces. Consequently at the end when he sees the kids faces it means that he has gone through his CATHARSIS, a very big element in understanding the end, and his guilt has been realized and terminated. The kids were always his totem and seeing their faces made him realized he has reached his final destination and that he is back into reality.
  29. Bungled at 10:21pm 26th July 2010 First of all, if you’ve had someone close to you take their own life, YOU PROBABLY DON’T WANT TO SEE THIS MOVIE. Although their are some good parts, the whole really isn't very good for two main reasons. First, the number one rule of fiction is broken in a huge way - Don't explain but instead show and reveal. The first half of the movie is packed full of characters explaining what is happening or what will happen, all to establish the premise of dreams within dreams with varying passage of time. Secondly, the movie makers trap themselves into this premise and plod away at the final suspense/action sequence, cutting between the multiple layers of dreams to the point that each cut starts feeling like a gag - "Oh, now we're in a shooter video game set in snowy mountains...oh, there's the van falling in slow motion again...oh, there's the sidekick rolling about on walls and ceilings. Once the sidekick lassos his buddies together and moves them around in no gravity I couldn't help but laugh out loud, as did a number of people in the theatre. Other than these two big flaws there are many others such as - 1. More key characters should have gone through a discovery process across the entire film, figuring out layers of dream and reality along with the audience. 2. The most intense altered reality scenes are all used up during the young lady architect's training. 3. Aren't your dreams way, way, way more bizarre and intense than 99% of this movie? 4. We are given no reason what so ever to really have any concerns about the "bad guys" in this film, nor is there anything that really convinces us that the "good guys" are really in peril. 5. The moral question of "Is it OK to pirate someone's mind and mess with it?" is never really addressed. 6. We are given no reason to believe that the inception being executed is really justified or important. 7. Why doesn't the grandpa just take the kids on vacation out of the country so they can visit their Daddy? 8. If you could live a whole life time in a dream world you created with your spouse, would you create a weird, ugly, urban world? Would you really want to spend that whole life time alone together? 9. The Asian bossman mumbled at times. 10. I thought that a life time in the deepest dream level could leave you with scrambled eggs for brains, but apparently the Asian bossman was fine when he woke up. 11. I can not stand chase/fighting sequences where you can not at least have an good idea of where people are, where they are specifically rushing to, and who is who. This movie was full of this kind of badly filmed and edited junk, especially the winter fighting scenes. This movie is OVER RATED. Oh yes, as a 35 year fan of mystery and sci fi - the plot WAS NOT COMPLICATED OR HARD TO FOLLOW...IT WAS VERY, VERY PREDICTABLE.
    1. ReadandWeep at 3:40am 30th July 2010 Bungled, Your review reminded me of this one: http://shuckinthejive.com/?p=204, which nearly guaranteed I'd skip seeing it in theaters. I was beginning to reconsider after Ryan's glowing report, though. Thanks for re-introducing some rationality.
  30. Amelia at 10:29pm 19th July 2010 Such an amazing movie. I just saw it last night, the audience was just so into it! I laughed, I cried, I went through a whole bag of popcorn because of the adventure. Such an amazing movie with amazing originality! The whole Molly thing with Cobb was really interesting. Each character was different. This movie sure did make me think, and I left completely satisfied. No way that was the last time I'm seeing that movie. The ending...fabulous, in a wicked kind of way. One of the best movies of the century. Highly recommend it!
  31. Jeff at 4:45pm 19th July 2010 @ Mary, if you didnt know what level of the dream they were in, you weren't paying enough attention. Everything inportant in the movie was explained. You just had to pay attention the whole time. Awesome movie. Loved it.
  32. Swagat at 8:38am 19th July 2010 i just found a discrepancy in the very basic concept of Inception..Di Caprio n co use a certain device and chemicals to share the dream space of their target..once in the dream they use the same device to go one level further..how can the device and chemicals exist in the dream world??
    1. SUOrangeman at 8:36pm 19th July 2010 It's the job of the architect to put the chemicals into the multiple levels of the dreams.
      1. ioman at 9:15pm 19th July 2010 Umm nope. The architect designs the level, the chemist makes the chemicals that puts them to sleep.
        1. phil at 12:14pm 23rd July 2010 yes. it was the architect. Obviously once you are dreaming you don't need 'real' chemicals - but imagined ones. All the things in the dream are placed there by the architect, then the rest filled with the subconcious of the subject. One thing - if the guy realises he's dreaming at the end - the billionaire heir - and in the dream its leo telling him that someone's trying to rob him - then he wakes up on a plane, surrounded by the people in his dream, and he knew someone was just trying to extract information from him - how does he not realise what's just gone on?
          1. gen at 5:10am 2nd August 2010 Maybe they never even woke up, maybe they were all part of Leo's dream or imaginary dream world while he was in limbo.
            1. Chris at 3:50pm 6th August 2010 Cobb was definitely in limbo. Did you notice when he got back to "reality", his kids looked EXACTLY like they did in his dreams? Same clothes, same ages, same lawn scene, same movements? Boy sitting down, girl standing up?
          2. summer at 5:21pm 15th August 2010 because they are real to the dreamers -- youdidn't get it
            1. jake at 1:20am 16th August 2010 because they are real to the dreamers?
          3. jake at 1:19am 16th August 2010 couldn't he just dismiss all that...saying he was dreaming to begin with...so they ended up in his dream?
          4. chad at 8:40am 16th August 2010 exactly!, even if he was convinced in a dream to destroy his company, this would never influence his real life actions, because its just a damn dream!! nobody acts on dreams because there not real!!! the whole concept is ridiculous!!
    2. Dre at 5:43am 21st July 2010 They can if the device and chemicals aren't real to begin with. Therein lies the riddled ending...is everything a dream?
  33. zungtow at 7:44pm 18th July 2010 Just got back from watching it, this may well be the best movie of all time.
    1. Summer at 5:18pm 15th August 2010 I agree
    2. Gant at 3:03pm 17th December 2010 You're easy to entertain. The film is crap, waste of time. Just so bad it's possible to make with money. The storyline is a joke.
      1. Rattler at 10:21pm 27th December 2010 Your face is a joke.
      2. Joel at 11:58pm 27th December 2010 You obviously didn't understand the concept/plot. In order to enjoy the movie you have to understand what the characters are going through exactly. Go watch it again you might like it more.
      3. Rosa at 6:06am 16th February 2011 i agree with you.. i dont understand why people are soo heads over heels for it
  34. Mary at 2:07am 19th July 2010 Very mind twisting movie and you can't understand what is happeining by watching it once, my 14 year old says he understood it completely & my 15 year old was keep asking me, " who is fisher". so i don't know if i can tell whether i understood what was happening but overall it was a good movie but if only they only stop stretching it, in the middle of the movie, i was ready to throw up, cause didn't know which layer of dream they were in & what to expect. but the ending was good.
  35. wanting it be better at 12:30am 19th July 2010 Annoying thumping music, a silly elevator of memories, characters admit they don't know what is going on (and neither does the audience), a non-ending, mystery soldiers in white suits on snowmobiles with machine guns, so very bad..playing on the audience is a dream or not or maybe a dream of a dream? Then a bland female helper who looks lost, slurred dialog, and no science of course.
    1. gen at 5:06am 2nd August 2010 dude your crazy if u didnt think it was not good or at least pretty good, it had to make you think about life, dreams, something.
  36. anigie at 10:51pm 18th July 2010 Fantastic....thought provoking....ending left an opening for a sequel
  37. ioman at 7:54am 18th July 2010 Just watched it. Amazing movie and definitely this year's best so far.
    1. Gant at 3:06pm 17th December 2010 If this is the best film of the year, it must also be the first film of the year. On a scale from 1 to 10, I rate it to 2. 2 because there are some great effects, but it's a total waste of time to watch the film. Some people are easy to entertain.
Close Suggestion Dead Rising Film “Zombrex Dead Rising Sun” Has Release Dates
View Article