I am not going to spoil whether or not this is an Alien prequel. Sorry, I know you all want to know and everyone already assumes that it is anyway, but I will neither confirm nor deny where this movie stands in the world of sci-fi horror films. Partly because I think it would do you a disservice, and partly because I am a bit afraid that 20th Century Fox would murder me in my sleep. Call it 50/50.
Both Director Ridley Scott and 20th Century Fox have been playing the relationship between Prometheus and the Aliens franchise close to the chest. The truth, however, is that the relationship, whether there is one or not, doesn’t really matter. Prometheus is a movie that stands on its own, and it needs to be judged as such.
Prometheus has generated an incredible amount of hype, and in many circles, it is no exaggeration to say that it has been the most anticipated film of the year. Unlike The Avengers which is ripping through the chests of the competition, and unlike the unlocked ATM coming this summer that is The Dark Knight Rises, Prometheus has less of a wide spread appeal, but is perhaps equally as fanatically anticipated.
Prometheus is a sci-fi film in the truest sense of the word. It is a fictional film that is heavily reliant on science and the concepts beyond the realm of convention. It is a film that makes you want to think more than it wants to make you jump. The horror angle that the ads have been focusing on is actually a very small part of the film. Prometheus is deeper than that, and far more thought provoking. Or at least it tries to be and succeeds about half way.
The film is about aliens, but not the kind that rip out of chests and spew venom when Bill Paxton shoots them. On Earth in the closing years of this century, in that crater of history and culture known as Scotland <snicker>, two scientists, Dr. Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), confirm their theory and set in motion the events of the film.
The duo soon wake onboard the space ship Prometheus after a cryo-sleep, and find themselves in orbit around a planet that ancient star charts marked out as the home of aliens that may have had a hand in the creation of humanity.
Joined by a crew that includes: Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron), an employee of the journey’s sponsor the Weyland Corporation, an android named David (Michael Fassbender), and several others, the crew lands on the planet and discovers artificially made structures.
After exploring the first structure, the crew finds more questions than answers as the remains of a long dead alien race litter the ancient structure. But although the aliens may be long gone, that doesn’t mean the crew is alone.
The story is a moral theorem about the origins of mankind, mixed with a touch of tension. The questions raised are intriguing, and the cast is more than up to the task of conveying complex ideas and ideologies with their performances. The world that Prometheus lands on is stark and monotone at times, but amazing and beautiful as well. Scott and cinematographer Dariusz Wolski have an eye for the more fantastic scenes in the film, and things like watching the ship enter the atmosphere is a highlight and will stick with you. Watching this film in 3D is also the way to go, as Scott’s eye for the technology rivals that of James Cameron.
There is also a certain amount of stylishness to the film that stands out. It is somewhat undercut by the drab and gray nature of the world, but that is a deliberate contrast that is meant to give an oppressive feel to the world in a way that the plot never really achieves. Thankfully the acting is exceptional across the board, which adds a bit of color to the otherwise muted world, and can give you a focus on screen even when the visuals and aesthetics are bland.

A particular standout is Fassbender’s David 8, an android that is both comforting and unnerving all at the same time. Although his performance will be overlooked, it is worthy of award consideration and is reason enough to watch this film. Theron and Idris Elba (who plays Prometheus’ captain) also both eat the screen, but neither are given much to do when all is said and done.
Where the film stumbles is in the attempt to create tension through the surroundings without ever really justifying it with the plot. Prometheus wants to have you on the edge of your seat, but instead it is marred by major points of philosophy and moral conundrums, which would be fine, but the story has massive holes in it that are never addressed and are occasionally even contradictory.
The intention is to make you think and continue to keep your mind racing long after the final credits. Prometheus wants to be mysterious and make you search for the answers on your own, which is great in theory, but there is never enough context given to reach any real conclusions, leaving you with the feeling that there is a cutting room floor filled with additional footage or that a sequel was always the goal of this film. Both are probably true, and neither is a good way to make an entertaining film.

It is just too easy to pick apart the questions the film wants to raise. It becomes slightly bloated and ponderous, and seems to forget to make an engaging film while introducing these questions.
The biggest problem with Prometheus is the lack of tension. It is late into the film before anything even remotely resembling an action scene occurs, and then the movie goes into another lull. Again, that wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing, but it does highlight an issue with the pacing of the film.
There is just a spark missing to this film until late into the second act when a horror-like moment is created through the most mind-bogglingly improbable result that involved sheer dumb luck masquerading as a brilliant plan. It makes a bit of sense if you have seen the previous movies in the franchise (that this film may or may not be connected to), but take away the knowledge of a similar incident in another movie and it makes no sense.
Part of the reason for the lack of tension is Marc Streitenfield’s score, which is shockingly inappropriate as it desperately tries to create a memorable theme that will stick in your head. It is oddly light and uplifting, even as characters are screaming.

The music is another example of the idea that Prometheus seems to be at war with itself at times. It knows it has to have some horror elements, but it seems to introduce them grudgingly. This is most evident in the climax, which begins and ends with so much haste that you could blink and miss the ending–which also defies logic. It all feels like a prelude to something else coming in the future that could be amazing, but it does so at the expense of the current film.
Conclusion
All that being said, Prometheus is still a decent film, but it is also a forgettable one that attempts to walk the path of genius but too often seems to not want to do the leg work it needs in order to justify itself. But the art design and visual appeal are worth the price of the ticket though, and the acting is at times phenomenal.
There are several incredible, thought provoking, and substantial ideas that are introduced, but they never mature to anything more than a slightly ponderous series of expositions that are held together by very loose plot points that fall apart with even the most cursory of examination. There is a good film buried in Prometheus, and under that good film is a brilliant one. There is enough to enjoy justifying seeing it, but beyond that, the hype and expectations may do more harm than good for what is sadly average film.

It was a nice promotional video for the isle of skye, other than that… they must have ran out of ink, because the movie was built with a sequence of scenes that did not add up to the story or even made sense. A missed opportunity and certainly a dissapointing movie, even for the genre fan…
My wife and I both enjoyed the movie immensely, especially because it led us to a nice long science-related discussion afterwards. I was left feeling like I had seen part 1 of a series and part 3 is the original Alien movie.
LOVED IT! Best Sci-Fi movie out in a while. Now just can’t wait for Total Recall!
(spoiler alert) Although there are claims that this film is overedited, what struck me was the amount of time invested in story tangents that do not advance the characterization or the plot. One could easily imagine–in an earlier day–the geologists lost in the cave being played by Laural and Hardy. Other disposable scenes include the zombie crew member attack, the auto c-section, the opening geological dig, the holographic crew orientation, the crew meal, any scene with the captain, the engineer “space ghosts”, David 8 navigating the alien base as it ran on ios5; in other words, almost the entire movie. All this in the service of an inane plot device, black goo whose effect appears to be totally random. Whoever edited the trailer should get an academy award–somehow for 2 minute form this morass became the the most anticipated film in years.
I don’t understand what you mean by disposable…each of those scenes are essential to the formation of the story and there are almost no tangents in the plot. If you missed even 3 minutes of the movie at any point during its running time you would most likely miss an important plot development. Are you just saying you didn’t like the movie?
How was Shaw’s gestation and alien abortion essential to anything? It did provide the super squid at the end to doom the remaining navigator and hatch a new alien–but none of that is part of any consequential story arc–its just action filler. All these story threads are essentially filler–because there is nothing in the movie that advances our understanding of the characters, the engineers or the philosophical issues posed. I mean the story sets up a basic parallel between the android who lives among his creators and Shaw and Hollaway, who seek to find theirs. So why are we runnung around caves, dealing with magical black goo, having instant c-sections, exploding alien heads, or concerning ourselves with the sex life of a rigid corporate overseer and the funky soul man space captian?
The gestation and abortion provided action but also set up the ending sequence of events that saved Shaw’s life. This allowed her to escape and eventually leave the planet with David. I think there is a strong possibility of that being important. I think it was an introduction to the universe’s foundation lore. Not an answer to all of the questions we can ask.
Thanks–this clarifies the issue to me: people will embrace this plot salad because it “provided action” and sustained a possible sequel.
I agree, especially because I had to pee halfway through the movie and had a hell of a time finding a lull in the movie to do so.
Overall the movie was entertaining but you can tell throughout the entire movie there was plenty of footage that didn’t make it into the final cut that would’ve helped what did make sense. I think this movie will be much better when a directors cut is released.
I enjoyed the flick even though it was slow and was missing the excitement and suspense of the original Alien series. My friend, a non sci fi fan, said it was downright boring and a waste of $5. I liked the scenery and the characters especially the android. I figure they made room for a sequel in the last 3 minutes and I will definitely go see it. (My friend said he was curious to see what will happen next also but he might wait for dvd).
The movie did feel like the first chapter of something bigger. Maybe expecting it to be like the other Alien movies was not fair, especially considering the new title.
The trailers misled people to believe there would be more action
It was a nice promotional video for the isle of skye, other than that… they must have ran out of ink, because the movie was built with a sequence of scenes that did not add up to the story or even made sense. A missed opportunity and certainly a dissapointing movie, even for the genre fan…
Panos, I’ll give you Cowboys and Aliens, but both Lost and Star Trek were amazing. I’m seeing this movie in a few hours, and couldn’t be happier.
Agreed about Star Trek. Thought that was the best re-boot since Batman Begins.
underwhelmed
This movie was destroyed by the poor script written by Damon Lindelof who has a long history of destroying science fiction TV shows and movies like Lost, Cowboys and Aliens, Star Trek etc. He loves writing poor dialogue, stock characters, incomplete stories and worst of all religious nonsense. He should be blacklisted.
I have to agree with Simon, visuals are stunning and a flight sim for the Prometheus would be awesome.
As my wife said we could have waited for the DVD.
If you are a Aliens/ Predator fan you will really be disappointed as this prequel makes no sense to the timeline and just leaves the viewer with a whole lot of unanswered questions.
You don’t have to worry about “spoiling” if it’s an Aliens movie prequel or not. It was confirmed by Scott himself that it was. As did Michael Fassbender in a recent interview.
You’re being too kind. With the exception of the visuals (which were stunning) the movie is a dreadful disappointment. Fans of the franchise are treated to very few of the traits that made the original the groundbreaking film that it was, while those who are new to the Alien universe will find themselves wondering what all the fuss was about. The script is the biggest culprit here. How Ridley Scott agreed to film this story is hard for me to understand. It’s disjointed, poorly written, at times mind-numbingly obvious in the way it handles big “reveals” and worst of all, provides no basis for why any of the characters are doing what they do. Considering the Prometheus mission was worth a “trillion dollars” to its sponsor, the Weyland Corp., you’d think the group of 17 crew and scientists might have at least discussed what they would be doing upon arriving at a new, alien planet. Nope. They all run around as if they had won the trip to space in a lottery and not “hand-picked” professionals. Fassbender’s performance is the only redeeming element within the cast. The rest deliver the kind of cardboard you’d expect from a Lucas film.
I truly believe Scott started out to make an Alien prequel and did so with the first script. However, once the rewrite was done he changed his mind (with a little help) and went in another direction totally. What will be interesting is to see what’s in the deleted scenes and bonus footage on the BR/DVD when this is released. I think what’s going to happen is this movie will setup an Alien prequel AND a Prometheus sequel at the same time. The ending showed that glaringly. The movie IS visually stunning and I can’t wait to see (and hear) it at home but do look forward to the direction this takes Ridley Scott.
Wow. Such snobbery drivel. Sounds to me like a fake, pretentious critic who can’t appreciate a movie’s original and only inherent intent: escapism. Why is it so hard to simply accept a loose connection to the original ‘Alien’ film and let the movie stand on its own. You wanna be critics along with the author of the article have your own heads so far up your ass that you don’t allow the the basic insular nature of the story take you for the simple, yet cerebral ride it has for the viewer. Scott has his own agenda for the movie goer and doesn’t owe you schmucks anything. You should have made your own goddamn film if you had such high expectations for a lineal connection to the “Alien universe” (had to make sure that was in quotation due to the high level of snobbishnicity)
I’d advise even the casual scifi movie fan to not let any of the self inflated drivel of you pricks who are ripping this movie stop them from taking in a better than average experience.
You’re hilarious. Have you seen the movie or are you just irritated that people are panning it before you’ve had a chance to see it? Either way, I’m sorry for you. I’m the furthest thing from a movie critic. But I am passionate about the few movie franchises that I love and the Alien franchise is one of them. My total movie-theatre experience this year was going to be Prometheus and Dark Knight Rises. Perhaps because of that, I was especially let down by Prometheus. Look, I don’t think I could have made a better movie myself, but I’m not a movie-maker. Ridley Scott is. A damn fine one at that. But he has had almost as many flops as hits and unfortunately, we’re going to have to add Prometheus to the flops column. No one is more upset at that than me. My opinion of the film is just that, an opinion. But I suspect that the vast majority of people who go see Prometheus will share my opinion – even you, once you see it. Then, maybe you can come back here and we can have a serious discussion about the film’s strengths (it does have some) and its many weaknesses. In the meantime, why not save your considerable energy for dissing people who offer up uninformed comments without any shred of support. Or, y’know, keep trolling. It’s a free internet. :-)
I think your suspicion that the vast majority of people will agree with you may be misguided. Rotten Tomatoes does as well. So does IMDB. I don’t think we should have expected Prometheus to reflect the traits present in the Alien movies as it is not about xenomorphs, and this inherently changes the tone. Also, what basis for the character’s actions were you looking for? There were those who were there for money, those there for discovery, and those there for longevity. Each one of the character’s actions are reflected in their motivations, at least that’s what I thought.
Hmm, well you’re right in that I’m surprised RT gave it a 73% – that’s 23% more than I thought it deserved, and yet MetaCritic gave it 64 which is more inline with my reaction. And don’t get me wrong, it’s not like the movie was unwatchable – far from it. There was plenty to like, as long as your expectations are set nice and low. As for character actions, my chief complaint was that the writers expected us to believe that when 17 people are chosen to undertake the most sophisticated, long-term and expensive space mission ever conceived, they barely know each other after awaking from hyper sleep and there has been no apparent agreement on how the mission will unfold upon landing on the planet? I can barely believe that such a haphazard approach could build the Prometheus yet alone get it to an alien world thousands of light years from Earth. Because of that, I felt like I was watching a bunch of teenagers stumbling through a haunted graveyard and then freaking out when a zombie appears. I need a script to do a lot more to help me suspend my disbelief than that. But I take your point about the various motivations and agree that at least as far as that is concerned, each character more or less stayed true to what was supposedly guiding their behaviour.
There unfamiliarity with one another and the lack of a mission briefing until orbiting the planet was strange, I did notice that. I could see it being another example of Weyland’s subterfuge and an attempt to keep the project as secret as possible, but perhaps it was just awkward for no good reason. The main thing I didn’t get was the behavior of the biologist who haphazardly interacted with an unknown organism, that and the geologist who got lost, the very same geologist who was using his own technology to map the tunnels. Though, in real life, people are that dumb.
The final alien ship take off had the destinctive star wars prequel vibe. The holographic weyman also had a phantom menace feel. I also like the way everone emerges from two years on suspended animation into their well worn slacker gear. If the captain has mouthed the words “alien tricknology”, i would not have been the least bit surprised.