The Expendables Review

Review: Sylvester Stallone’s homage to the 80’s action-flick The Expendables, defies all expectations. And not in a good way.

From now on, for every time someone tells me how cool it is that I get to go see movies to review, I will point to a movie like The Expendables, just so they know it is not always fun.

The Expendables is a movie that suffers from one small defect. It is terrible. There really is no easy way to put that, and that hurts to say, because I really wanted to like this movie, but it just fails on so, so many levels that you almost feel bad for it. You want to forgive the wretched acting, and the plot that meanders around the screen like a drunken David Hasselhoff eating a cheeseburger.

Still, The Expendables is in many ways review-proof. The word of mouth will likely hurt the box office sooner or later, but no matter what the critics say, people will flock to it at first.  I would be shocked if it did not have a massive opening weekend.  And why not.  The stars of this movie have earned the benefit of the doubt, especially when it comes to action movies.  The draw of this movie will not be the plot- it won’t even be the action you have seen in the trailers- it will be the potential.  As a fan of action movies, it is almost impossible not to be excited for this movie from name recognition alone.  The best comparison for the cast that I could think of would be the original basketball Dream Team that laid waste to the Olympic competition.  Unfortunately there are serious flaws to the movie that are impossible to overlook.

Irony Doesn’t Make it OK

Directed by Sylvester Stallone, from a story by Stallone and Dave Callaham, The Expendables brings together legends of the action world. If you are even slightly interested in action, you will have unavoidably seen at least one of these stars at some point, in some way, blowing something up. It is an homage to the lost art of the 80s flick, back when it was a simpler time for action movies. The good guy was clearly identifiable as the good guy, and the bad guy was so evil, he was eeeeevil. The first problem with The Expendables is that it tries too hard to recreate those movies, but it does so with a knowing wink to the audience that was probably supposed to make it all OK because it was ironic, and stuff. Instead, the movie nearly becomes a parody of those same action movies it looks to honor.

Stallone stars as the leader of the mercenary-for-hire team, Barney Ross, while Jason Statham plays Lee Christmas, a knife expert and second-in-command. Jet Li plays Ying Yang, a martial arts expert, Dolph Lundgren plays burn-out Gunner Jensen.  Randy Couture is the tough guy on the team, Toll Road, while Steve Austin plays Paine, the henchmen for Eric Roberts’ James Munroe. Terry Crews, Gary Daniels, and Mickey Rourke round out the cast.  Each name on that list is capable of headlining their own movie (granted, some more than others), and together they make for an impressive lineup.

Now, when reading those incredibly unsubtle names, you have to think that the move “gets it”.  It knows what it wants to be, and asks you to get behind it without over thinking it too much.  And it is hard not to. When Bruce Willis shows up as the client, and Arnold Schwarzenegger pop up, you feel like you are part of an in-joke wrapped around an action movie, and that is a very good thing.  Then it all falls apart once they try to mix in the plot.

Guns, Drugs and… Something

This is the point in the review where normally, I would recap the plot, but to be honest, there’s really no point. There’s something about a tyrannical General and a plucky girl with courage that apparently is so vast that it totally replaced her common sense, then some nonsense about a vague drug connection that is supposedly worth a lot of money, but they never really go into any great detail on that point, which is fine, because it was pretty dumb to begin with. Basically the Expendables are hired to head to a tropical island that is under the rule of a dictator, and they are tasked with killing him.  It turns out that there is more to the General than meets the eye.  But no one is going to see this movie for the plot, which is good, because it stops making sense about half way through.

It isn’t just that the story is bad, but it is also really stupid. With movies like this, you can forgive a certain level of sloppiness. I don’t expect the plot to really push the limits of how I view life, I just ask that it make at least a lick of sense. Just a bit.  At the very least, just remain consistent.  Instead, what we get is a script that would be slightly embarrassing from a high schooler, and it gives a surprisingly intimate, and sad look at the psyche of Stallone. You don’t expect a lot of depth when you are watching a movie where the stars all look like Barry Bonds after his head grew three inches, but just make the damn thing make sense. It can be simple, it can be almost nonexistent, but you gotta give us something. And then there is the dialogue. It has been a long time since I heard anyone shout things like “Drop the weapons or I will shoot her in the eye!” There is a good reason for that.  It is not just bad, it is cringe worthy.

Terrible Script, Executed Terribly

And then there is the acting. I didn’t really expect much, but most of the performances are at best passable. At least kind of.  Stallone is Stallone, Statham plays a solid Jason Statham, Jet Li is alright in the few scenes he is in, and Terry Crews is surprisingly likable.  There wasn’t really much to work with to begin with in terms of dialog, or characterization, or things to do that didn’t involve shooting stuff. At least they are all consistently bad. That’s something, I guess.  There is one particular scene with Mickey Rourke where he tells Stallone astory about a woman that is supposed to be a turning point for the movie, but instead it marks the turning point from bad to worse.

The Expendables also assaults the laws of physics. Now, I don’t care that Mythbusters proved that shooting a gas tank won’t actually make a car explode- if it blows up pretty, I will proudly cheer and dare people to tell me not to. But, wow. A 60-year-old man, running at full speed, simply could not catch a moving airplane. He just couldn’t. And it isn’t just the laws of physics that suffer, it is the disregard the movie throws at your intelligence. To give you an example, towards the end, not one, but two of the characters are shot. Nothing serious, but they are hit, there is no question that they are wounded. Both characters — at totally different points in the movie, mind you — simply walk it off. In fact, one of them gets in a knockdown, drag-out, ultra-physical fight minutes after. Despite. Having. Been shot. It’s like the movie just forgets about it.  The characters don’t even mention it later.  They aren’t even wearing bandages afterwards.  The film sort of dares you to have a problem with it, but that isn’t even close to the biggest problem with The Expendables.

I could forgive pretty much anything in this movie under the right circumstances. I could overlook the terrible acting. I could forget that Dolph Lundgren looked and acted like there was a tiny man inside his head controlling a Dolph-bot throughout the film. I could handle the dull  and nonsensical story and weak emotional connection to the characters, as long as the action was good. But it wasn’t. There are plenty of blood-splattered scenes throughout, and lots of bad guys explode in super neat ways, but the fight scenes are terrible.

Epileptics Beware

The direction and camera work are ridiculous. In one action sequence, there are so many quick cuts and edits that it is almost impossible to fully grasp what is going on. Many times, the camera will cut away after less than one second. One second. And it does it repeatedly. It is like watching a strobe light of violence. At one point I counted two cutaways in one second– something I was unaware was even possible, and was sad to be proven wrong. It is dizzying, and robs the movie of the only thing it really had going for it, leaving you to instead try and focus on the plot, which was a bad move. And it just continues to get worse.

That really is the death knell for this movie.  The fight scenes are shot with such a heavy emphasis on speed and multiple angles, that it becomes difficult to track the action, and it becomes difficult to track who is doing what.  There are a few very cool action scenes- some are even truly worthy of being called “bad ass”, but these moments are over so fast, and filmed so oddly, that your brain literally does not have time to process and enjoy what you just saw.  It truly becomes dizzying to try and track all the sudden movements, which is a shame, because somewhere beneath the bad direction and terrible editing, there are some great action scenes begging to come out.

Once the end confrontation  finally comes around, it is so anticlimactic that I was just glad that it was over, notwithstanding the awkward and pointless epilogue. Then the movie just kinda stops, rather than ends.

I really, badly wanted to like this movie.  The summer movie selection this year has been thin, and we are due a big, huge, explosion driven visual feast that we can turn our brains off for.  There are simply too many flaws to recommend this movie.

So in summation, The Expendables is awful. The acting is bad, the plot is childish, and the action is badly filmed. Save your money and go rent one of a thousand better action movies from the 80s. Or better yet, just spin in a circle until you are dizzy and then run until you fall over. Pretty much the same thing.


Updated 8/13/201

Showing 42 comments

  1. Stuart at 4:26am 29th December 2010 It's so rare that I actually hate a movie but then along comes this. If I had a fork nearby I would've jammed it in my eye, up to the friggin hilt mind you, just to get out of watching it. Then I could be all: "oh look, I'd love to go on struggling with this but I seem to have blood spurting out of my eye, best I go get that looked at. Bye!". Just totally hideous and I am embarrassed for Sly. Now what did I do with that fork?
  2. torm3nt at 9:23pm 13th December 2010 I don't think the author of this review understood the movie's intent - at all. If you went into that film expecting anything less than a tongue-in-cheek homage to 80s action films, then you were there for the wrong reason. Everything was over-acted, and the cliches were MASSIVELY overdone - for a reason. It was taking the piss out of an era in film that is long gone, and in every way it succeeded immensely. One of my favourite films in years because it doesn't try to be something it's not. Kudos to Stallone, great job!!!
    1. kelly at 9:29pm 27th December 2010 Saw it on ppv last nite..worst pos ever....only in the ready to pull the handle time to flush us of a could that make it to no. 1 PPPPPUUUUUUKKKKKKEEEE and I wanted to like it!
    2. Stuart at 4:28am 29th December 2010 Are you kidding me?! Hideous mate.
  3. Peter Hillock at 1:38am 11th December 2010 There's so much badness to talk about that nobody's mentioned the part of the plot that gave me a migraine: little brown people helpless to throw off their clownish dictator-- puppet of the powerful White Guy-- need a mumbling White Guy to save them. He and his Yanqui friends do so by massacring the whole conscript army. In a country that small, I think that wipes out every first-born son on the island, but no matter, the little brown people are suitably grateful as they wave goodbye from the smoldering ruins of their city. Wow. That part of the plot alone made me dizzy enough to fall down. Great review!
  4. Otter64 at 12:50pm 29th November 2010 It wasnt the worst movie i have seen, but i Have noticed when you put too many big name actors in a movie it turns out very mixed up....... The plot is the same, a bunch of bad asses save the day, in this movie as i am watching it now, it is much easier to follow one bad ass than a bunch of them. I will say that Jason statem had the best roll and did the best acting, his charecter was entertaining. I think that with all the talent in the movie this is the best item you could turn out, like having 3 super stars on a team who do you watch and who do you cheer for. The last good movie that I have seen with a super star cast I would have to say was preditor. Sorry for the misspelled words not a good typist.
  5. robinsayer at 9:00am 27th November 2010 This film looked to me like something that happens when the actors think that it's them that make the movie great rather than the writer and director. It's like the Mona Lisa deciding that as everyone likes her painting she can probably knock up couple of canvases. We really wanted to like this movie but had to turn it off half way through as the site of 60 year old Sly drooling over the girl, the bizzare fight scenes and the crazy dialog were doing our heads in.
  6. willis,b at 8:43pm 20th October 2010 Movie sucked. Review really hit the spot bad movie bad plot. and what the hell was bruce and arnold doing there. copletely pointless
  7. drew at 8:34pm 26th September 2010 o and why was terry crews there since when did he become an action star
  8. drew at 8:30pm 26th September 2010 wow for all the hype about this movie and all the action stars they put in it IT SUCKED i nearly fell asleep watching it. the action scenes and stupid catch phrases were bloody terrible. jason statham be able to find better work than this. stallone stop making movies
  9. Byxor at 7:18am 16th September 2010 I agree with the reviewer, this is one of the worst films a have seen in a LONG time. It really is hard to rescue anything from it, I'm only glad I didn't pay to go see it but downloaded it in the Pirate Bay. And quickly erased the torrent after I saw how terrible it was
  10. ltlfrari at 6:53am 13th September 2010 So the story was non existent, so the acting was crap, so the general's mansion looked like something from a Universal Studios Theme park set (so obviously set up to be destroyed) , so what? This movie was so bad it was good. This movie wasn't about there being a story, it was just an excuse for a load of guys to stage some fights and to blow things up and for that it was great. Not sure why Willis was there but Sly and Arnie have had ongoing digs at each other in movies since like forever so it was good to see them do it face to face for once, even if it was just for such a short time.
  11. james at 7:04pm 5th September 2010 i ran in circles after i saw this and poked myself in the eye. It was sad.I thought it was going tobe over the top and a parody ...if it was the joke went on to long and wasn't done well.the movie never made up its mind if it wanted to be cheese or cheetos
  12. Cian Peyton at 5:22pm 28th August 2010 Seen the movie tonight, the first 20 minutes I was thinking, this is gona be awesome, but unfortunatly this is not going to be in my top 10 movies of all time... bad acting bad dialog bad storey lines, good action on the big screen tho and gets a few laughs along the way, few really good fighting sceens with Jason Statham, I think his charicter was the best out of the lot... Sly is is still the man tho :)
  13. Yowel Shaw at 12:05am 26th August 2010 hey guys.. you can watch it here.. http://kinggab.com/action/the-expendables-2/
  14. Triple A at 9:04am 25th August 2010 Really enjoyed it if you like Commando, Predator, Rambo, Universal Solider etc then you'll like this. The story wasn't the best but the action/fight scene where awesome. Think the director did well to include all the charcters at some point. Who cares if there was a odd mistake. The film did exactly what it says on the tin. Maybe not as classy as the A-Team but well worth a watch!!!!
  15. USMCO3 at 1:03pm 20th August 2010 I think the review was crap as I enjoyed the movie, my family and friends have enjoyed the movie, so thank you for the waste of electrons
  16. Adam_Zed at 2:42pm 16th August 2010 As much as I hate to, I gotta agree with the reviewer. I don't care about the plot, or the retarded dialog, or any of that- I can overlook it all, but the action was hard to follow. Expendables is this year's Transformers. Yeah, I said it...
  17. Paul Speir at 7:56am 16th August 2010 Thanks for a great review! It summed up my thoughts on the movie perfectly. I cringed throughout half of the movie, slept through about a quarter of it, and the rest was spent massaging my temples to try to relive the intense headache the really awful editing was giving me. And what was the worst thing about the movie? How much people loved it! The audience roared with laughter at times--literally were rolling in the aisles, a true OMGROFLMAO! I would hear it then quickly scan the screen to see if I missed something funny. No, the worst thing was that my wife loved it. God, how do you have that conversation? It was a serious bone of contention throughout the rest of the day. We had to stop talking about it. I was getting angry. But the best part about the movie was that it led me to this review and to your last few lines. Best laugh I had in a while. I wish I HAD spun in circles then ran until I fell down instead of watching this movie. I would've enjoyed myself much more.
  18. Ruttiger at 11:11pm 13th August 2010 This was one of the worst movies this year - and I love action flicks and have a high tolerance for stupid plots, inane dialog and 2 dimensional characters, when the action compensates. In this case - the dialog could have been written by a 12 year old - again can be forgiven - I mean how subtle were the one-liners in Commando, which I loved. But honestly the lines were not just bad but embarassing. Ok action - it's all about action - so let's talk about how impossibly bad the action was. I will forgive that they called Jet Li's character 'Ying Yang' - but seriously - wtf. He is the martial arts god - so throw him some bones - let him destroy some people in his style - I mean they give the wrestlers their day in the sun why not a real fighter like him. His fight scenes are stuttered and quick-edited like he was a novice fighter that couldn't fight out of a paper bag. That might work for Christian Bale's batman or Jason Bourne because they're hollywood newbs - but you're clipping Jet Li's moves just to make never-was's like Lundgren look fast? Sorry - you lost me before you had me. There were occasional scenes where I thought - man that was a cool way to kill someone - but they were way too rare and were usually followed by some stupid explosion that was supposed to be caused by a trail of gasoline but for some reason exploded every 20 feet like dynamite was planted. Sigh - so much potential and nothing delivered - please don't add any more to their bottom line.
  19. hello at 10:34pm 13th August 2010 It is exactly what is expected if you hated it why would you go see a movie like this?
    1. annegrrrl at 11:17am 14th August 2010 Just curious, how could you know if you hated a movie before you saw it? I'm also fairly certain that he went to see the movie because it's part of his job...
  20. green at 10:31pm 13th August 2010 fuddi dea apni ma chudaun nu fer site kholi aa
  21. ae2 at 10:11pm 13th August 2010 im guessing you were not part of the alpha males in line waiting to see this movie. the movie is entertaining and thats what its meant for. not an oscar. terrible review! go watch eat, pray, love. you sound like you'll enjoy it more. cheers.
    1. Barry at 11:52am 14th August 2010 Im with Ae2, quite frankly this movie was everything I expected it to be. The action was there, and I thought that Jason and Sly made an awesome team. Maybe you should watch eat, pray, love, or Fever Pitch. After you watch that you can go home an take a bubble bath with some wine.
      1. Adam_Zed at 2:44pm 16th August 2010 Same kinda BS mentality that got Bush elected. "You either like it or you are a girl".
  22. frich. at 10:07pm 13th August 2010 I really enjoyed this movie for what it is... an homage to the by-gone 80s action flick. It does not have a deep, twisted plot akin to something by Aronofsky or von Trier. It's not an art film, it's an action flick for men. What it does is deliver big explosions and loud guns--and it does so admirably on a monstrous movie theater screen. Maybe you should turn in your man card and go see Eat, Pray, Love with Julia Roberts.
    1. NotBruceWillis at 10:29pm 13th August 2010 Sometimes men have brains and want to see a movie that doesn't suck. I haven't seen this movie, but just giving it a pass "or else your a girl" is sort of lame. There are plenty of killer movies that just flat out don't suck. They don't have to be art house, they just have to make a bit of sense so they hold your interest or have some awesome action scenes. Sounds like this one didn't have either. Its a fail. Its a waste of time. Reviewers try to tell us that. That seems to be what the author did here.
      1. frich. at 10:44pm 13th August 2010 I think the initial reviewer was being overly critical. I was satisfied by the script's fluidity in all honesty. There's not a lot of development, but that would just get in the way of all the explosions and fight scenes anyway. Let me break it down. SPOILER ALERT. SERIOUSLY. Sly takes job on fictional South American island. Goes to do recon and meets contact (a girl?!). Girl helps. Bad guys show up. Girl stays behind even though she helped out the "enemy". Sly has a heart-to-heart with Mickey Rourke. Bad guys will kill girl since she helped Sly. After the h2h, Sly chooses to go back and save her. I think he was hoping for an "I-saved-your-life-let's-bang" rendezvous. Leaves and gets attacked by bad guys. Gets away from bad guys. All of his friends meet him and go with. Get to the island and find out not all is as it seems. Girl is daughter of target! Wait, target isn't real target?! (Sh*t bricks) Take out every single bad guy. Explosions! Save the girl. Leave the girl. Meet up at Mickey Rourke's and throw knives. Roll credits.
      2. Dice at 5:16pm 15th August 2010 Sounds like this one didn't have it either? Sounds like? To me, it "sounds like" you didn't even see it, making your opinion on it worthless. Adding your opinion here is, to quote you, "a waste of time."
      3. Paul Speir at 8:00am 16th August 2010 I love action flicks but in this case I wish I HAD turned in my man card and went to see Eat, Pray, Love. And I despise Julia Roberts. When she laughs you can see all the way to the bottom of her stomach. But I would've watched twenty of her movies to avoid this terrible, horrible movie.
  23. Hugh at 7:09pm 13th August 2010 Personally i think the the original author missed the basic premis of the movie and that was "guns, women, explosions and your favorite action stars". The plot was loose at best but then again...the movie wasn't for plot. The acting was about as good as you get in any action film...again movie not for the acting. One thing this movie did acomplish is it kept me and the other poeple in the packed movie theater i went too glued to thier seats. This movie delivered on all fronts if you went into is expecting to see non-stop action. I for one did and enjoyed every second of it.
    1. Alfredo at 11:09am 6th September 2010 i completely agree. i just saw it and even though this reviewer is right. there is something else in these movies...something that can't be reviewed and you can't write. you just feel it or you don't. loved it!
      1. Joe at 11:09pm 30th September 2010 yeah, I really don't understand people who even rate movie as trash... this was the best action movie so far personally to me.. it was like the all star version of action movies I mean why do people see action movies? To see some damm good fighting and exploding don't really care MUCH about the plot as long as it makes somewhat sense and not too silly looking. This was a solid great action movie and when would we even have an opportunity to see those action movie stars meet up again and make another film like this.. come on people... !! if you're looking for some non-stoping great muscle + all kinds of action this is just for you....!!!!!!!
  24. Jeff at 1:29pm 13th August 2010 Maybe this will help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMEqzom36m8
    1. skullqwake at 10:40am 15th August 2010 Thanks, Jeff.
  25. BizarreSubpar at 1:08pm 13th August 2010 Saw it last night at midnight. Thought it was a POS. Worst movie I've seen all year.
  26. Sid at 12:02pm 13th August 2010 I wanted to read this review but the writing is absolutely horrible. All I got out of it was "Here's how the movie was bad. It's so bad that I'm going to tell everyone I meet it's bad. Just going to say 'it's bad' over and over. That's it. They'll believe me because this is my JOB." This entire article could have been succinctly said as: you thought the dialogue was cheesy, you didn't like the editor's cut and compared to where you feel films should be at now -- you didn't care for it. I would have had more respect for that being upfront. Instead your tirade of nothingness leaves me with knowing nothing more about it than I knew from watching the trailer.
    1. Kasu at 4:18pm 13th August 2010 I think his article was very constructive, even though emotionally sentenced. It gives the reader a perfect idea of how the film was to him, and I must say that I agree on just about every word after seeing it today.
    2. Annz at 7:24am 17th August 2010 Simply being "succinct," as you put it, would not have given any kind of explanation as to WHY this movie was bad. Obviously you need to back up your opinion with examples from the movie. Clearly he wasn't just saying "It's bad. That's it" as you can very apparently see the breakdown (in categories!) as to what made this movie horrible.
    3. gonds at 4:38am 25th August 2010 pure muscle action fine fine fine but i thought it was ok. sure there was no story at all but that was expected. i found it funny especially when stallone was running and he couldnt seem to carry himself hahahah . if women have sex and the city men have expendables :)
    4. miranto at 8:17pm 8th January 2011 The article says exactly what I couldn't say after watching the movie IT"S BAD! not good bad but bad bad! ...
Close Suggestion Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World Review
View Article