Skip to main content

Apple Music chases Spotify with a reported 10m paid subscribers in six months

apple music 10 million paid subscribers
d8nn/Shutterstock
Recent forecasts suggesting Apple Music could top 20 million subscribers by the end of this year may well play out following news that the streaming service’s paying user base recently crossed the 10-million mark.

The figure, provided by a Financial Times source, indicates the service is expanding its user base at a steady rate after Tim Cook’s revelation back in October that 6.5 million people were at that time paying the $10 monthly fee to use the service.

While Apple has taken six months to reach the reported 10 million paying users, Spotify, Apple’s big rival in the music streaming space, took six years. However, it’s worth remembering that Apple Music launched right off the bat in more than 100 countries – and with some 800 million credit cards on file via iTunes – while Spotify didn’t even reach the all-important U.S. market till 2011, five years after it launched.

Although it’s facing tough competition from Apple, Spotify seems to be coping comfortably, last summer announcing it had 20 million paying users – double that of a year earlier. In addition, Spotify’s ad-supported offering is used by around 75 million music fans, with the company working diligently to persuade as many as possible to switch to its paid tier, which, like Apple’s, also costs $10 a month.

Responding to the FT’s news that Apple had apparently reached the 10-million milestone, Spotify’s head of communications, Jonathan Prince, revealed that the second half of last year witnessed the London-based streaming service’s “faster subscriber growth ever.”

It’s clear that competition in the music streaming space is more intense than ever, a reality that recently led to Rdio’s demise. Some of Rdio’s key assets were snapped by Pandora, though the radio streaming service is also facing some serious challenges of its own.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Dolby Atmos Music through Apple’s $549 headphones left us shrugging
Apple AirPods Max

You don't need a dozen speakers to enjoy Dolby Atmos Music anymore. It's now something anyone with an iPhone, an Apple Music subscription, and a set of headphones can hear. In the not-too-distant future, Android users will be able to get in on the Atmos action, too.

But does Dolby Atmos Music actually sound better? Given Apple's spin, plus my own experiences listening to Atmos Music via Tidal on my home theater system, my expectations were very high for Dolby Atmos via headphones.

Read more
Spotify tweaks search functionality to make music discovery more convenient
Spotify logo on a phone.

As a streaming service, Spotify hangs its hat on music discovery, but until recently, its search functionality had made the process a bit more cumbersome than it needed to be. Fortunately, the company will soon release a small tweak that places search filters at the top of the page (just below the search bar), allowing users to easily switch back and forth between artist, song, playlist, and album searches.

Previously, people needed to scroll down below their search results to apply these filters, a process that was confusing to some and irksome to others.

Read more
You won’t need 17 speakers to appreciate Dolby Atmos in Apple Music
Vizio Dolby Atmos Soundbar

Shortly after Apple’s announcement yesterday that it will be adding lossless music streaming to Apple Music, Twitter was awash with hot takes, mainly in the form of jeers. “Does anyone care about lossless audio files except for the guy I dated in 2008 who made me a CD of FLAC files,” asked Wired senior writer Lauren Goode.

Goode makes a, ahem, good point: Just how big of a deal is lossless audio anyway? The answer is -- for the vast majority of folks, who happily listen to Spotify or Apple Music on an inexpensive set of wired or wireless earbuds -- not a very big deal at all. In fact, these people probably wouldn’t hear much of a difference even if their headphones could let them hear lossless audio, and the fact is, most wireless headphones simply can’t.

Read more