Skip to main content

Apple’s simplified payment plan to stream music would make life expensive for rivals

apple new pay plan for streaming music
Creative Commons
Apple is all about simplified processes. This especially seems to be the case when it makes business more expensive for the competition. Apple approached the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board with a proposal to streamline and simplify payment terms for songwriters and publishers, according to Billboard. The proposal also inherently raises the cost for Apple’s competing music providers like Spotify and YouTube to continue free streaming services.

The current payment program requires streaming providers to pay songwriters and publishers between 10.5 percent and 12 percent of their overall revenue. The exact percent paid is based on a complex formula that has been criticized by musicians. After the percentage is determined, payment is split into public performance and mechanical royalties that are paid to collecting societies and publishers.

Apple’s proposal would make this process much more simple and easy to understand. In its filing, Apple states that the Cupertino company would like to see a plan approved that is, “fair, simple and transparent, unlike the incredibly complicated structure that currently exists,” according to Billboard. Apple suggests a payment of $0.00091 per stream, which equates to 9.1 cents for every one hundred streams.

Apple did not simply pull that amount from the air, as it is based on payments for downloads. In fact, the payment for one hundred streams would be the same as the payment for one download under the company’s proposal. Apple’s plan would continue to allow publishers to collect mechanical royalties and allow collecting societies to obtain public performance royalties.

Complicated or not, the current plan is a better model for companies like Spotify and YouTube, which offer free streaming and pay royalties based on revenue. These companies’ plans generate less revenue than a paid service, and moving to a fixed payment tier would greatly increase the cost to continue offering free streaming. Apple’s proposal is hanging on a decision and if approved, could take some time to put into play.

Editors' Recommendations

Dave Palmer
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Dave’s technology geek-fest began with the classic Commodore 64 computer, which started a lifelong passion for all things…
Why the best device for Apple’s lossless music will be an Android phone
A woman wearing the silver Apple AirPods Max.

In recent days, there’s been some talk of Apple launching a new lossless hi-fi audio tier for its Apple Music streaming music service. The leading evidence for such a move is a few lines of code in iOS 14.6 beta spotted by 9to5Mac. Those lines, which have since been removed, referenced “lossless” audio with the Apple Music app.

Apple certainly has competitive reasons to finally venture into the lossless audio category: Spotify, Tidal, Amazon Music, and Qobuz all offer CD-quality or better-than-CD-quality music, which leaves Apple Music as one of the last holdouts. But I can’t help feeling that Apple has boxed itself into a corner when it comes to lossless audio, and I don’t see an easy way out.
Bring back the jack?

Read more
HomePod owners can now ask Siri to play music from Deezer
homepod mini hand side

Music streaming service Deezer can now be added to the HomePod and HomePod mini. Doing so means that if you own one of Apple's smart speakers, you'll be able to ask Siri to play tracks, artists, albums, favorites, or playlists. It will work for Deezer subscribers in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Spain, the U.K., and the U.S.

Deezer joins just a handful of third-party streaming music services that Apple allows on HomePod devices, including iHeartRadio and Pandora.

Read more
From NYC to Seattle, Apple’s City Charts show which tunes have residents rockin’
Apple Music City Charts

Music charts have been a staple for decades, showing folks how popular specific songs and artists are, usually at a national or global level. But what about regional differences? Could it be that people in Dallas are digging a very different set of tracks than the denizens of New York City or Seattle? Enter Apple Music's latest feature, City Charts, whoch gives a look at the top 25 tracks from major metro areas around the U.S. and around the world.

The City Charts, which cover more than 100 cities globally, are updated daily, Apple says. And they're not exclusively based on the number of plays a track is getting. Apparently, Apple also looks for "additional signs of local popularity" to rank the top 25 songs gaining momentum with listeners locally, though the press release Digital Trends received did not offer any details on these additional factors.

Read more