The once proud Netscape may turn into a viral community site appealing to a younger demographic. It's a very poor move.

I remember back in college, downloading Netscape Navigator Gold beta in an effort to get onto the World Wide Web without having to pay for a web browser. Back then companies actually made money selling browser software. You basically had your choice of Mosaic or Netscape from what I can remember. I was not a big techie back then either, I just used what was on the store shelves of the once popular Egghead Software retailer. And this was of course before Microsoft ruined the whole industry by introducing a free web browser, Internet Explorer. But even then, you could download a free beta version of Netscape to use for free. It had more features than IE at the time and was well-written. Times have of course changed and since its inception Netscape has fallen into the virtual gutter of homelessness, lost and without an identity.

The New Netscape?

Announced earlier this week, Netscape is trying a new business model, adopting a viral community design in which readers submit the content and then vote on each others submissions in an effort to take that article to the front page for more exposure. You can of course comment on the stories and even vote ?Good? ?Bad? or ?Block? on the comments allowing the readers to self moderate the site. In a sense it?s all a façade to get readers into thinking they have editorial control. The more control they have, the more likely they are to comment, submit stories and re-visit the site. Of course the corporate execs are laughing their way to the bank ? or would like to anyways.

Spearheaded by the new General Manager Jason Calacanis ( who thinks he will be the next AOL CEO ), who recently sold his blogging company Weblogs Inc. to AOL, the new Netscape is a complete and poorly executed rip-off of the popular site Digg.com which has grown from 30,000 readers a month to now more than 8 million monthly readers, making it one of the most popular sites on the web ? in any category. Digg has an intuitive interface with an easy-to-read layout designed with the readers in mind. The new Netscape on the other hand is plagued with ill-placed advertisements and although each submission links to the source article, it is done so with a Netscape site frame circa 1999 which really prevents the reader from truly visiting that linked site.

Guerilla?s in the Mist

At first glance it would appear that people are really enjoying the new Netscape beta, but as Digg readers have pointed out only about 80% percent of their traffic was from unregistered users who never really submit stories or post comments. Only about 24 people are actually submitting comments and articles (are these the Netscape Guerilla Bloggers? Probably Not ). This is called Guerilla marketing and Jason Calacanis is a genius at doing this. The idea is simple: hire a bunch of people to continually submit stories, post comments and make the site look busy. Jason used this tactic with several of his blogs and it worked fabulously. So what is the goal of the new Netscape?

As Saul Hansell a writer for the New York Times points out:

?AOL, part of Time Warner, has been trying to move away from its rapidly declining Internet access business by building a series of advertising-supported Web sites.?

You see Netscape is losing its audience – again. Down to 11.4 million users from 15.4 million a year ago, there is not enough compelling content or a good enough marketing push to keep readers coming back, Netscape is like the corner restaurant that switches from serving Italian one week to Chinese the next hoping to grow its business, but confusing people in the process.

The Netscape Audience is Changing

If this business model sees the light-of-day and it looks like it will, Netscape readers will change from the baby-boomers of yester-year to a younger audience more interested in Jessica Alba?s Bikini or Britney Spears than real intellectual news. Of course those that have any intellectual sense will already be visiting the Digg or Slashdots of the worlds. And what the executives at AOL need to figure out is whether there is real money in doing this. As I browse the Netscape Beta site, I see ads for Diet Products, Class Mates.com, and Toe Nail Fungus Medicine. Let me repeat this: AOL does not want to go down this road and use the Netscape brand to represent this type of content.

What the Crystal Ball Predicts

So will this new community site be a success? Well if your goal is to simply get page views and offload extra inventory you have sold for your other sites ? then yes. If AOL?s goal is to revive the Netscape name, to give it a new gallant purpose ? then no. Leave the MySpaces, and Digg?s of the world alone. Create something unique, innovative and of real value, then AOL will get the quality readers they so desperately need to survive.

Why does my opinion matter?

So you may be asking why my opinion matters. It doesn?t really. I have very little impact in the online world; I am simply an observer like you. I am however a big fan of Digg.com, I think it?s innovative and presents good value. I think it?s sad to see a once proud property like Netscape fall into the garbage bin with a rip-off site, but hey, that?s just my opinion.

I would love to hear what you think about the changes going on over at Netscape. Is it for the better or the worse? Am I out of my mind? I want to know.

Showing 12 comments

  1. Kat at 3:27pm 21st August 2006 Friends don't let friends drink starbucks.
  2. HP at 8:34pm 28th June 2006 I use netscape, but just the email since I've had the email account since around 2001. I go to the site and just click on the mail link as soon as it's button loads. Yeah I add to the site's traffic that way I however rely more on Slashdot for information.
    What's most sad about netscape is that it was such a great browser; now look at it and the state of it's website for that matter as well.
  3. ashok pai at 10:19pm 24th June 2006 yes, its sucks and hurts to see netscape fall into corporate ways of martyrdom. aol sucks, and have toyed with netscape enough. close it down for ****'s sake. its really bad to see an icon that fought an evil empire like that of MS being asked to slave away for petty needs. AOL must die a similar death, and they are pretty well on the way. they deserve every bit of it.
  4. Benji at 11:42am 18th June 2006 David, Check out these links:

    http://www.blogherald.com/2006/03/20/engadget-bust...

    http://digg.com/technology/Engadget:_Busted_for_Un...

    http://www.blognetworkwatch.com/2006/03/engadget_b...

    This was not the first time either. The continuelly steal content from other sites. Jason's response was "It was a mistake". Very lame...Engadget is quickly losing street cred in the industry.
  5. David Lee at 12:16am 18th June 2006 Lets give Jason some credit here. I really liked what he has done with webblog (endgadget) where I read about products before the company making announcemnet. He's putting his name and reputation on the online so it'll be interesting to see what happened.
  6. Brad at 3:05pm 17th June 2006 OK -- I have a bit of an agenda here. I work for the current Netscape (not the new one) and I have watched what AOL has done over the past few years to this brand. It's kind of sickening. Has Netscape lost unique visitors? Yes! But where did they go? To AOl, that's where. The dirty little secret here is that AOL has been siphoning off unique visitors to their products, resetting users home pages from Netscape to AOL.com when they download AIM. Forcing Netscape to carry AOL channels (Music, Moves, TV, etc.) rather than thier own content and basically doing a ton to undermine the brand integrity. It's all for the sake of pumping up the AOL.com numbers at any expense. God forbid they face the music that people won't visit their sites unless you force feed them.

    NOTE TO AOL: Listen to what the users want and give it to them and then give them more. Your programming expertise means nothing unless it's based on what folks want!

    Let's be clear, I think Jason Calacanis is a very smart guy but then again so was Hannibal Lechter (or at least he was in the book). This pale copy of DIGG that he's launching makes me kinda sick. He's an egomaniac that brown noses the right execs so he can get his way. I know I have an attitude about him but dismantling something you've worked on for years will kinda make you grumpy. But what he's doing is not a whole lot worse than where AOL was taking the brand. Netscape has been a fun ride. I'm just sorry to see it end this way.
  7. robert at 10:41am 17th June 2006 Yes, Netscape has truly gone down the tubes. Maybe it should be rebranded to "Netscrap" or "Netscrape." I think their demise began when AOL bought them up...
  8. Tim Stevens at 12:41am 17th June 2006 Maybe the 15million users are actually the people who use the Netscape ISP/dial-up service?
  9. Jeanie at 3:58pm 16th June 2006 Who goes to Netscape anyways? And how did they have 15 million users last year?

    The site doesn't do anything for me and I hardly get it. Looks like teenie bopper crap with links to uninformative sites, mostly blogs.
  10. Tim Stevens at 1:51pm 16th June 2006 Great article. I completely agree with you. When I was in college I worked for the computer labs at the library. We sold Internet connection software (Mosaic, PPP, etc) to students for about $3 per floppy. I'd get people coming in all the time wanting to get the Internet on a floppy...haha!

    Anyways, Netscape died a horrible death thanks to MS. If Netscape tries to re-invent itself as a clone of another site, that seems like an act of desperation. I checked out the beta netscape site yesterday and today, and at first glance it looks like it's all the same articles too.

    I can't believe Jason said he was going to be the next AOL CEO...
  11. ricky bobby at 1:38pm 16th June 2006 There's more ads than content, which I don't mind if they were about something related, but they have a nasty foot nail in them. Yechk.
  12. Frank J. at 1:32pm 16th June 2006 Hmm anyone else notice that this Netscape site links to 90% blogs, not even actual news sources like Digg does? Bias here from the blog master Jason himself? Totally.
Close Suggestion TelcoTV Operators, It?s All About Price
View Article