UPDATE: To avoid any further confusion, we have removed all names that appear exclusively on the Global Intellectual Property Center letter, which was sent to Congress a month before a draft of SOPA was submitted to the House of Representatives, and includes no mention of any specific legislation. Our list now only includes the names of companies that are on the official House Judiciary Committee list of SOPA supporters.
ORIGINAL TEXT
With the next House Judiciary Committee markup hearing delayed until “early next year,” opponents of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA) are looking for more ways to fight back against these contentious pieces of legislation, while they still have a chance.
The anti-SOPA crowd includes everyone from Internet giants like Google, Facebook, eBay, Wikipedia, Mozilla and Yahoo! to The New York Times, the Stanford Law Review and even the very people who created the Internet in the first place. Experts say SOPA and PIPA would not only stifle free speech by allowing widespread censorship (in the name of copyright protection), but could castrate innovation, destroy the open Internet, and disrupt the very foundation upon which the Internet was built, the domain name system. (See a comprehensive list of SOPA opponents here.)
From the pro-SOPA side, we’ve heard much from organizations like the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the US Chamber of Commerce — not to mention politicians, like Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the chief sponsor of SOPA, and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee. But far too little light has shone on the hundreds of organizations that continue to support SOPA, despite the staggering dangers it holds for the Internet as we know it.
Below is a list of 439 corporations, unions, law firms and other groups that have explicitly expressed their support of SOPA, or similar anti-piracy legislation. This list is derived from two sources: the official list (pdf) of SOPA supporters from the Judiciary Committee’s website, and a letter (pdf) addressed to Congress from the Global Intellectual Property Center, which is an affiliate of the US Chamber of Commerce.
Some have begun organizing a mass boycott of these organizations, and a list (Google Doc) of contact information for each is currently in the works. We’re not advocating any specific action, but we do think it is important for people to understand who is for and against SOPA and PIPA; if passed, either of these bills will fundamentally change the online world, whether you think that’s a good idea or not.
Update: We have learned that Petzl America has explicitly stated that while it supports greater protections of intellectual property, and signed the Global Intellectual Property Center letter to Congress (along with 401 other companies on this list), it “does not support SOPA or the Protect IP Act,” or any other legislation that will “harm the freedom of the Internet.” We have taken their name off the list.
Update 2: All of the law firms that originally appeared on the Judiciary Committee’s list of SOPA supporters have been removed. We have removed them from the list below. They include:
BakerHostetler LLP
Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Irell & Manella LLP
Jenner & Block LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kendall Brill & Klieger LLP
Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert LLP
Lathrop & Gage LLP
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Mitchell Silberberge & Knupp LLP
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Phillips Nizer LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
White & Case LLP
It has not yet been officially explained why these firms have been pulled off the list. At least one firm, however, Davis Write Tremaine LLP, has said that it does not support SOPA, but two of its lawyers privately support the bill.
Update 4: The Redwing Shoe Company has emailed, informing us that it “does not support SOPA as it is currently drafted.” Redwing is one of the 402 companies that signed the GIPC letter mentioned above, which does not specifically name any legislation. We have removed their name from the list below.
Update 5: Gibson Guitars has also clarified that it does not support SOPA: “Hey guys – Gibson does NOT support this legislation. Gibson’s CEO has demanded that Gibson be removed from the list of company’s supporting SOPA. Don’t believe everything you read on the Internet!”
Update 6: Nintendo and Sony Electronics have both been removed from the Judiciary Committee’s official list of SOPA supporters. Correction: It is currently unclear whether Nintendo, Sony Electronics and EA support or oppose SOPA.
Sony Music Entertainment, Sony/ATV Music Publishing and Sony Music Nashville all remain on the list. GoDaddy, after failing to convince users of its anti-SOPA stance the first time around, has also come out explicitly against SOPA. GoDaddy has been removed from the list.
Update 7: Leatherman Tool Group has emailed us to clarify that they do not support, and have never supported, SOPA. “We did not sign ANYTHING to support or endorse SOPA,” writes Leatherman’s PR department. “Leatherman has never been contacted or consulted about/during the creation of SOPA. Leatherman’s name has been erroneously added to a ‘list’ of SOPA supporters.” Leatherman’s name was added to this list below due to its signage of the GIPC letter. Its name does not appear on the official list of SOPA supporters from the House of Representatives. We have removed Leatherman from the list below.
Update 8: Taylor Guitars — which signed the GIPC letter but does not appear on the official House list — has emailed us to clarify that it does not support SOPA. Taylor Guitars has been removed from our list below. Here is the company’s full statement on SOPA:
In August 2011, Taylor Guitars, its trade organization, NAMM, and other music industry manufacturers offered a signature of support on a U.S. Chamber of Commerce letter sent to Congressional members to encourage the introduction of anti-piracy and counterfeiting legislation. As the letter was not bill-specific, we felt the spirit of its intent was in accordance with our efforts to confront ongoing piracy and copyright infringement issues that we, like many others in the industry, continue to battle. However, our desire to stop piracy and counterfeiting has been misrepresented as support for the Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261). Clearly stated, we do not support SOPA and its intent to restrict the Internet. The values of freedom, creativity and innovation are at the core of our business, and SOPA is not in accordance with those values.
List update: To avoid any further confusion, we’ve updated the format of this list to make these companies’ SOPA stances more clear. All companies whose names appear in bold are on the Judiciary Committee’s official list of SOPA supporters; non-bolded companies appear only on the GIPC letter, which does not name any specific legislation.
| 60 Plus Association ABC Alliance for Safe Online Pharmacies (ASOP) American Bankers Association (ABA) American Federation of Musicians American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA) American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) Americans for Tax Reform Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States Association of American Publishers (AAP) Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies Association of Talent Agents (ATA) BMG Chrysalis Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) Bulding and Construction Trades Department Capitol Records Nashville CBS Corporation Cengage Learning Christian Music Trade Association Church Music Publishers’ Association Coalition Against Online Video Piracy (CAOVP) Comcast Corporation Concerned Women for America (CWA) Congressional Fire Services Institute Copyhype Copyright Alliance Coty Inc. Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) Council of State Governments Country Music Association Country Music Television Creative America Deluxe Entertainment Services Group Directors Guild of America (DGA) Disney Publishing Worldwide, Inc. Elsevier EMI Christian Music Group EMI Music Publishing Entertainment Software Association (ESA) ESPN Estée Lauder Companies Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Gospel Music Association Graphic Artists Guild Hachett Book Group HarperCollins Publishers Hyperion Independent Film & Television Alliance (IFTA) International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees (IATSE) International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition (IACC) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) International Trademark Association (INTA) International Union of Police Associations |
L’Oréal |
[Image via Elnur/Shutterstock]
Petzl America has publicly stated that they are AGAINST SOPA. Like other companies on this list, they signed a LETTER expressing their concern with copyright protection. This letter had NO BILLS OR ACTS mentioned. Of course any company that produces a product will have worries about being ripped off, but a majority of these companies DO NOT want to see a government controlled internet.
You are absolutely correct about Petzl, and I’ve updated the article to reflect that. Thanks for the catch.
In terms of most of these companies not supporting a government controlled Internet: All of these companies either appear on the official SOPA support list, from the House of Representative, or they have signed a letter from the Global Intellectual Property Center, which is an affiliate of the US Chamber of Commerce — a very staunch and vocal supporter of SOPA.
My argument is that any company or organization that signed that letter needs to explicitly distance itself from SOPA. If not, they give additional ammunition to those who are pushing for its passage.
Then these companies need to contact the judicial and send a letter AGAINST SOPA / PIPA to make it clear they aren’t supporting it.
Heh, the US Chamber of Commerce should be worrying about things like keeping hackers out of their networks. Stupid douche bags.
This should be a wake up for all of the hackers out there. Get into the companies’ websites, hack them, virus them and do whatever you have to do because soon we will not be able to click the mouse button without getting permission from the suited pricks in Washington D.C. Boycott is for people without any computer hacking skills while attacking the websites of the supporters of SOPA is for people with unique skills. Furthermore, the programmers should come up with a different system to bypass all of the bull crap legislation. Why are there companies on that list that produce or make any products. The big prick behind this bill is trying to use different companies to overwhelm the anti-supporters of SOPA. I hope Congress will see thru these white lies and will not pass this bill. If they do, they should burn the original constitution and order copies from China.
“Below is a list of 439 corporations, unions, law firms and other groups that have explicitly expressed their support of SOPA, or similar anti-piracy legislation. This list is derived from two sources: the official list (pdf) of SOPA supporters from the Judiciary Committee’s website, and a letter (pdf) addressed to Congress from the Global Intellectual Property Center, which is an affiliate of the US Chamber of Commerce.”
The official list does not exist at:
http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/Rouge%20Websites/SOPA%20Supporters.pdf
So why is it removed?
Is your list valid?
There are companies on that list that do not seem to support SOPA.
If the info is removed because it is incorrect, why does the US government spread misinformation about its citizens? (assumption: the official list was distributed via a government site). Instead of removing it shouldn’t there be a message explaining it? etc etc etc
Ok, found the list again:
http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/Rogue%20Websites/List%20of%20SOPA%20Supporters.pdf
So it is a modified list? There are about 123 names on this one.
Ok, and the second list at:
http://www.theglobalipcenter.com/sites/default/files/pressreleases/letter-359.pdf
is the one that lists companies that do not seem to support SOPA.
Petzl is on it for example while they state on their website that they do not support SOPA. They also give a good insight how information that has been gathered earlier this year has been used here for different purposes.
A couple of these are listed twice. I ported most of them to a list on twitter, please feel free to use it :)
Go-daddy is now off the list, thanks to reddit!
Beachbody => p90x
btw
Please change “The 439 organizations SOPA opponents should worry about” to “The 439 organizations SOPA opponents should destroy”
Here is another way to protest ! Robocall all the SOPA supporters here http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/reverse-robocall-campaign-lets-citizens-phone-blast-sopa-supporters.ars
Kind of a confusing title, I thought these orgs opposed SOPA at first. Should be changed to “439 organizations that support SOPA (i.e. companies you should avoid doing business with)”
Estée Lauder is listed twice.