Skip to main content

Whoops! How AMD (inadvertently) prepared Intel to crush cable companies

comcast cable broken remote
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There is a battle going on for your living room. Apple, Google, Microsoft, Intel, Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon are battling U.S. cable companies, who want you to keep paying hundreds of dollars a month, mostly for content you don’t use or will end up watching online anyway. The New York Times reports this week that Intel is trying to change the game and make it so you only pay for what you want to watch, but cable giants are standing in its way. Clearly you want Intel to win, but attacking an entrenched team of gigantic companies with deep pockets and lobbyists is no easy task. But here’s the interesting part: AMD may have inadvertently assured that Intel can win. Let me explain.

How cable came to strangle us

It should be no surprise that cable and telephone companies love the fact that you pay them hundreds to get access to TV that, when I was a kid, was broadcast over the air for free. When cable was first proposed, a lot of folks argued that TV viewers just weren’t stupid enough to pay for something they got for free. Apparently they were wrong, and that doesn’t exactly say wonderful things about us. But the cable companies got regulated monopolies into our homes, and what initially cost $10 to $15 a month now costs many of us close to $100 for programming we really don’t have time to watch. In my own case, just to get the Speed Channel and watch a small set of programs I want, I had to pay nearly $20 a month for the entire “sports package,” most of which I really don’t care about.

Intel wants to break this model, and the cable companies aren’t amused. I mean, they kind of like the idea of customers paying tons of money for stuff they don’t use. I really can’t blame them, but I’m rooting for Intel.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

How AMD helped intel

As powerful as Intel is, it would really be no match for the massive power of the telephone and cable companies. Through lobbying, these firms have a long history of manipulating the government to get what they need, and Intel would have simply been over matched. However, for the last couple of decades, AMD has being pounding on Intel on anti-trust grounds and, as a result Intel has one of the strongest anti-trust lobbying and legal teams on the planet.

I think Intel is going to win, and we’ll get vastly better pricing on programing and services …

Locking up a market, as these cable and telephone companies have done, looks and smells anti-competitive, and this is the angle Intel is using to break out the service it wants to sell. Thanks to years of attacks from AMD, Intel has the equivalent of a nuclear arsenal in this space, and the company is raining down missiles on the anti-competitive efforts of the defending cable and telephone companies, which are – by definition – regulated monopolies.

As a result, I think Intel is going to win, and we’ll get vastly better pricing on programing and services that we wouldn’t have been able to see as a result. I have every belief that if Intel can get through this gauntlet, the service it will provide will be amazing. I’ve met the guy running the unit, and he built the BBC’s system, which currently leads the world in digital content delivery. In other words, the more you hate your cable or telephone company for programing, the more you’re likely to love what Intel plans.

A crumbling monopoly

There is clearly a change in the wind. Americans are tired of paying tons of money for programing they don’t watch, and more and more of us are unplugging to live off of services like Hulu, Amazon, or Netflix. Intel is going to try to break this market wide open using a legal weapon it originally developed as a result of AMD’s challenges, and that weapon is currently unmatched in the industry. Without it, taking on the entrenched telecom companies would likely be impossible, so Intel oddly has AMD partially to thank for its state of preparedness. In the end, assuming Intel is successful, we’ll get the service we should have always had and be able, with Intel’s help, to give that one-fingered salute to the industry that has been painfully harvesting our hard-earned cash for decades. I can hardly wait.

Editors' Recommendations

Rob Enderle
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Rob is President and Principal Analyst of the Enderle Group, a forward-looking emerging technology advisory firm. Before…
AMD has a lot to prove this year
Dr. Lisa Su at the RX 7900 XT launch event.

AMD has clawed its way up from many disasters. Always chasing Nvidia and Intel, the so-called Team Red stayed strong over the years and found its niche in the PC market, a niche that has seemingly worked well, especially over the past few years.

Despite these valiant efforts, this past year has made me worry about the future of AMD, and the beginning of the year so far has only confirmed some of my worries.
Processing the past

Read more
A major era in Intel chip technology may be coming to an end
An Intel processor over a dark blue background.

Intel's next-generation Arrow Lake chips are said to be coming out later this year, but we don't know much about them just yet. However, a new leak shows us that two crucial features may be missing from the next-gen CPU lineup: hyperthreading and support for the AVX-512 extension. If Intel is ditching hyperthreading, it's not entirely unexpected, but it might make it trickier for even its best processors to beat AMD.

Hyperthreading allows physical cores in Intel processors to perform two tasks simultaneously, improving efficiency and performance in multi-threaded applications. Intel first introduced it in 2002, but it hasn't used the technology in every generation of its CPUs between then and now. The tech was all but gone from client processors for many years following its launch, although it was still present in certain models. Since then, Intel has selectively implemented HT across its product stack. In the last few years, it became a staple, especially in midrange and high-end chips.

Read more
Here’s how AMD counters Nvidia’s big RTX Super launch
RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT on a pink background.

Well done, AMD. Today is a big day for Nvidia -- after all, today is when the RTX 4070 Super hits the shelves. So what does AMD do? It serves up a huge price cut on one of its top graphics cards in this generation to strike back at Nvidia and counter its big release. Coincidence? No way. But will this price tag be low enough when Nvidia launches the RTX 4070 Ti Super?

AMD's RX 7900 XT is the GPU that's now a lot cheaper, with an official price of $750, but some models are as cheap as $710. It initially launched at $900 and was never the most popular option out of AMD's two flagships. The RX 7900 XTX, priced at just $100 more, often made more sense due to its greatly improved performance. As such, the RX 7900 XT was a bit of a forgotten entry in AMD's lineup. Its price quickly plummeted to $800 and even lower at certain retailers.

Read more