<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World of Warcraft in 3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 18:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alur</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-222195</link>
		<dc:creator>alur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-222195</guid>
		<description>Ohmygosh?  DLP is becoming rapidly obsolete even with the advanced bulb or whatever they call it.  Who wants the extra depth of a DLP tv andhaving to pay $350 for a bulb?  I bet dealers don&#039;t want disposable TVs because they want the repair profits.  No problem with trying to make a profit, but what customer wants to pay $350 for a bulb and worry about repairs too?  With plasma TV&#039;s under $1000 and most around $400 -$ 600, they are a disposable item.  Geez, I wouldn&#039;t have bought a DLP 2 years ago let alone in 2011!    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohmygosh?  DLP is becoming rapidly obsolete even with the advanced bulb or whatever they call it.  Who wants the extra depth of a DLP tv andhaving to pay $350 for a bulb?  I bet dealers don&#039;t want disposable TVs because they want the repair profits.  No problem with trying to make a profit, but what customer wants to pay $350 for a bulb and worry about repairs too?  With plasma TV&#039;s under $1000 and most around $400 -$ 600, they are a disposable item.  Geez, I wouldn&#039;t have bought a DLP 2 years ago let alone in 2011!    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-169845</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-169845</guid>
		<description>They are talking about the PC game world of warcraft, and running it with a computer system optimized for 3D gaming. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are talking about the PC game world of warcraft, and running it with a computer system optimized for 3D gaming. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohbiwan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-146536</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohbiwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-146536</guid>
		<description>I am a retailer of high end televisions and have several 3d models, the Mits for a couple of years now. I can comment on the &quot;get the big screen from amazon&quot; idea mentioned. There could be no worse advise on buying a big screen than to get it online. The Mits have a very high failure rate, in the 20% range( I have sold Mitsubishi for 25 years), and no warranty service center will fix a TV bought on the web - I know because I turn them down every day and the entire industry is on the same page on this. They are terrific sets, but need to be purchased from someone that can and will service them. TVs should not be disposable. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Recently we attended a conference on 3D that included reps from Amazon, Best Buy, Ultimate and all the box houses. They all complained that it was too hard to put the right parts together and create an effective demo - that their people were out of their league. All of us independents just looked at em&#039; dumbfounded - they can market, but they have no idea what they are doing. There are no electronics experts in the box house electronics world. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;After reviewing the Panasonic, Samsung, Sony and Mitsubishi 3D sets, I can tell you that the DLP technology is the winner hands down, with the LASER television being the best by far. Then the Panasonic for color depth, and the Sony and Samsung for brightness. The Panasonic looks a bit low on Gamma but very realistic compared to the LED sets. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;If you are going for the big WOW 3D factor, find a local dealer for the Mits cinema DLP televisions that can service the TV and you will be pleased. Or spend more for flat - but buy it from someone that can fix it and actually know how use it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a retailer of high end televisions and have several 3d models, the Mits for a couple of years now. I can comment on the &quot;get the big screen from amazon&quot; idea mentioned. There could be no worse advise on buying a big screen than to get it online. The Mits have a very high failure rate, in the 20% range( I have sold Mitsubishi for 25 years), and no warranty service center will fix a TV bought on the web &#8211; I know because I turn them down every day and the entire industry is on the same page on this. They are terrific sets, but need to be purchased from someone that can and will service them. TVs should not be disposable. </p>
<p>Recently we attended a conference on 3D that included reps from Amazon, Best Buy, Ultimate and all the box houses. They all complained that it was too hard to put the right parts together and create an effective demo &#8211; that their people were out of their league. All of us independents just looked at em&#039; dumbfounded &#8211; they can market, but they have no idea what they are doing. There are no electronics experts in the box house electronics world. </p>
<p>After reviewing the Panasonic, Samsung, Sony and Mitsubishi 3D sets, I can tell you that the DLP technology is the winner hands down, with the LASER television being the best by far. Then the Panasonic for color depth, and the Sony and Samsung for brightness. The Panasonic looks a bit low on Gamma but very realistic compared to the LED sets. </p>
<p>If you are going for the big WOW 3D factor, find a local dealer for the Mits cinema DLP televisions that can service the TV and you will be pleased. Or spend more for flat &#8211; but buy it from someone that can fix it and actually know how use it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anacarina</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-130778</link>
		<dc:creator>anacarina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-130778</guid>
		<description>i just purchased the nvidia 3d system and I am really enjoying it.  I just got it a few days ago and it is a lot of fun.  It puts things into a whole new perspective.  I actually built my entire system around my computer being able to play in 3d.    I have the samsung syncmaster and being used to playing WOW on a laptop I think the view is incredible....  I guess its all relative....  a matter or perspective yes???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess I&#039;ll have to hop back on here when I have gotten more play time in....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just purchased the nvidia 3d system and I am really enjoying it.  I just got it a few days ago and it is a lot of fun.  It puts things into a whole new perspective.  I actually built my entire system around my computer being able to play in 3d.    I have the samsung syncmaster and being used to playing WOW on a laptop I think the view is incredible&#8230;.  I guess its all relative&#8230;.  a matter or perspective yes???</p>
<p>I guess I&#39;ll have to hop back on here when I have gotten more play time in&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trollgaard</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-120453</link>
		<dc:creator>Trollgaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-120453</guid>
		<description>@Spid3y: I totally agree. I&#039;m not gonna throw a rant at the author as I haven&#039;t read any other of his reviews(if there are any), but the plump information here is rather a &quot;this is what grinds my gears&quot; story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have ordered the stereoscopic 3D set with the 22&quot; samsung and hope to get it soon. In the meantime I can tell you what got me to go from my normal 25.5&quot; to a 22&quot; for this effect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I run a rig with 2xnVidia GTX280 and have the opportunity to test the &quot;normal&quot; 3D effect with the use of some ordinary red/cyan 3D glasses(Called the nVidia 3D Discover). The glasses for this are only sold in packages with a 3D ready GPU from nVidia, so it&#039;s an expensive experiment if you already have a card with support. However, you just need some glasses... I bought a Blueray 3D movie just to get some glasses to test with and have 1 simple thing to say; &quot;It was totally mindblowing! I have become an easy target in PvP plainly because I&#039;m walking around watching the scenery.... I agree with the author that the &quot;world&quot; suddenly becomes quite static, but there&#039;s no winds in the 2D version either. Apart from the occasional /fart of course. It&#039;s rather that it&#039;s easier to notice that the trees don&#039;t move. It takes some getting used to and tampering with the settings to get it right, but when you do... You&#039;ll never go back to 2D. I got a new challenge, a new world and even a new character.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The details aren&#039;t Crysis, but they never have been. It&#039;s Wow. It&#039;s cartoony, but it&#039;s good cartoony. It feels kind of having the biggest papermodel world with alot of papermodel characters running around in front of you. The details are more than satisfying and I think that with trees moving etc. it would be harder to see enemy movements. I tried Far Cry 2 too. Moving leaves is not always a good thing... I still haven&#039;t got the full hang of it myself after only 3 days and I feel the strain on my eyes after 1hour or so because of the immense depth and crossing of eyes (the latest nVidia drivers messed up the UI a bit it seems). An older driver (191.07 works for me) is the clue to get an ok UI, but I hope nVidia will correct the issue in a later version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fps drop wasn&#039;t too noticable, but I run 2x10k rpm drives in striping, i7 920cpu, 6GB ram and 2xGTX280. I had between 100-120 fps in IF and down to 40 in Dalaran. Much the same as without 3D actually. I don&#039;t know if the new glasses will affect this though, but I&#039;ll try to remember posting here about it if I can. I have only tested the nVidia 3D Discover with colored glasses made of cardboard(Not even the nVidia ones). These makes you loose some color and are causing a strain on, eyes in the long run on the biggest depths. But they made me order the &quot;real thing&quot; because it was a new way to see Azeroth. I even notice that it&#039;s easier to remember different locations because of the details in the environment. If you have an nVidia GPU with support for stereoscopic 3D, go get some cheap glasses and test it first. Then decide if you go for the expensive solution. Just remember; Wow must run at Full screen to get the 3D working. Good luck and see you in 3D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spid3y: I totally agree. I&#39;m not gonna throw a rant at the author as I haven&#39;t read any other of his reviews(if there are any), but the plump information here is rather a &#8220;this is what grinds my gears&#8221; story.</p>
<p>I have ordered the stereoscopic 3D set with the 22&#8243; samsung and hope to get it soon. In the meantime I can tell you what got me to go from my normal 25.5&#8243; to a 22&#8243; for this effect.</p>
<p>I run a rig with 2xnVidia GTX280 and have the opportunity to test the &#8220;normal&#8221; 3D effect with the use of some ordinary red/cyan 3D glasses(Called the nVidia 3D Discover). The glasses for this are only sold in packages with a 3D ready GPU from nVidia, so it&#39;s an expensive experiment if you already have a card with support. However, you just need some glasses&#8230; I bought a Blueray 3D movie just to get some glasses to test with and have 1 simple thing to say; &#8220;It was totally mindblowing! I have become an easy target in PvP plainly because I&#39;m walking around watching the scenery&#8230;. I agree with the author that the &#8220;world&#8221; suddenly becomes quite static, but there&#39;s no winds in the 2D version either. Apart from the occasional /fart of course. It&#39;s rather that it&#39;s easier to notice that the trees don&#39;t move. It takes some getting used to and tampering with the settings to get it right, but when you do&#8230; You&#39;ll never go back to 2D. I got a new challenge, a new world and even a new character.</p>
<p>The details aren&#39;t Crysis, but they never have been. It&#39;s Wow. It&#39;s cartoony, but it&#39;s good cartoony. It feels kind of having the biggest papermodel world with alot of papermodel characters running around in front of you. The details are more than satisfying and I think that with trees moving etc. it would be harder to see enemy movements. I tried Far Cry 2 too. Moving leaves is not always a good thing&#8230; I still haven&#39;t got the full hang of it myself after only 3 days and I feel the strain on my eyes after 1hour or so because of the immense depth and crossing of eyes (the latest nVidia drivers messed up the UI a bit it seems). An older driver (191.07 works for me) is the clue to get an ok UI, but I hope nVidia will correct the issue in a later version.</p>
<p>The fps drop wasn&#39;t too noticable, but I run 2x10k rpm drives in striping, i7 920cpu, 6GB ram and 2xGTX280. I had between 100-120 fps in IF and down to 40 in Dalaran. Much the same as without 3D actually. I don&#39;t know if the new glasses will affect this though, but I&#39;ll try to remember posting here about it if I can. I have only tested the nVidia 3D Discover with colored glasses made of cardboard(Not even the nVidia ones). These makes you loose some color and are causing a strain on, eyes in the long run on the biggest depths. But they made me order the &#8220;real thing&#8221; because it was a new way to see Azeroth. I even notice that it&#39;s easier to remember different locations because of the details in the environment. If you have an nVidia GPU with support for stereoscopic 3D, go get some cheap glasses and test it first. Then decide if you go for the expensive solution. Just remember; Wow must run at Full screen to get the 3D working. Good luck and see you in 3D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Samsung LN19B650</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-61084</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Samsung LN19B650</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-61084</guid>
		<description>very well,Thanks for your sharing this information &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20&quot;&quot;&gt;http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20&quot;&lt;/a&gt; title=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20&quot;&quot;&gt;http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20&quot;&lt;/a&gt; target=&quot;_blank&quot; ref=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20&quot;&gt;http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very well,Thanks for your sharing this information </p>
<p>
 <a href="<a rel="nofollow" href="http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20""></a><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20" rel="nofollow">http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20</a>&#8220; title=&#8221;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20""></a><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20" rel="nofollow">http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20</a>&#8220; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; ref=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;><a rel="nofollow" href="http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20">http://astore.amazon.com/samsung.ln19b650-20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spid3y</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/world-of-warcraft-in-3d/#comment-61085</link>
		<dc:creator>Spid3y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-61085</guid>
		<description>Why nVidia would send a test kit to someone that has never played the game in regular 2-D and expects them to write a good review is insane to me. I was looking to see how much better the game is, what the fps drop was. I was not looking for how bad or good you had of a time switching from CoH to WoW. I mean there are plenty of games out there that support the 3-D tech, and you only tried WoW? This would be like me masturbating my whole life, and then when I had sex that lasted 30 seconds, writing a review on the internet about how to find the ****oris. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you ever seen honey I shrunk the audience 3-D at Disneyland? Can you compare it to that at all? How about in PvP? Will a shadowbolt pop off the screen at me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More and more of these review sites are failing their readers because they hand a story to someone that has no idea what they are doing. Did they ever give a Superman story to anyone other than Lois Lane? NO she is sleeping with the dude so of course she gets the story!!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is crazy that you are the only review of the tech on the internet so far and there is NO information in this story at all. No one is going to buy a $600 addition to their PC when all you say about it is that leaves are flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why nVidia would send a test kit to someone that has never played the game in regular 2-D and expects them to write a good review is insane to me. I was looking to see how much better the game is, what the fps drop was. I was not looking for how bad or good you had of a time switching from CoH to WoW. I mean there are plenty of games out there that support the 3-D tech, and you only tried WoW? This would be like me masturbating my whole life, and then when I had sex that lasted 30 seconds, writing a review on the internet about how to find the ****oris. </p>
<p>Have you ever seen honey I shrunk the audience 3-D at Disneyland? Can you compare it to that at all? How about in PvP? Will a shadowbolt pop off the screen at me?</p>
<p>More and more of these review sites are failing their readers because they hand a story to someone that has no idea what they are doing. Did they ever give a Superman story to anyone other than Lois Lane? NO she is sleeping with the dude so of course she gets the story!!! </p>
<p>It is crazy that you are the only review of the tech on the internet so far and there is NO information in this story at all. No one is going to buy a $600 addition to their PC when all you say about it is that leaves are flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-05-27 12:03:09 -->
