<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak Ships First WiFi Digital Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/kodak-ships-first-wifi-digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/kodak-ships-first-wifi-digital-camera/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:40:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: homer</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/kodak-ships-first-wifi-digital-camera/#comment-51762</link>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51762</guid>
		<description>Well Kodak claims to be first in WiFi ie to Internet location/destination ... Nikon and Canon WiFi&#039;s to laptop storage ... then it takes another step to get it out to a remote location on the internet ... if i am reading their literature correctly ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Kodak claims to be first in WiFi ie to Internet location/destination &#8230; Nikon and Canon WiFi&#039;s to laptop storage &#8230; then it takes another step to get it out to a remote location on the internet &#8230; if i am reading their literature correctly &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fungku</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/kodak-ships-first-wifi-digital-camera/#comment-51761</link>
		<dc:creator>fungku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51761</guid>
		<description>802.11b should be good enough for image files I would think, just not for video files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>802.11b should be good enough for image files I would think, just not for video files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/kodak-ships-first-wifi-digital-camera/#comment-51760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51760</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nigel,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had suspected as much. That is why I mentioned that Kidak &quot;claims&quot; without saying they are the first. Any idea if the Canon or Nikon are 802.11g compliant? 802.11b seems pretty slow for transfering larger files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nigel,</p>
<p>I had suspected as much. That is why I mentioned that Kidak &#8220;claims&#8221; without saying they are the first. Any idea if the Canon or Nikon are 802.11g compliant? 802.11b seems pretty slow for transfering larger files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Pond</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/kodak-ships-first-wifi-digital-camera/#comment-51759</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51759</guid>
		<description>Not the first -- one of the Nikon DSLRs has an add-on to give it wireless capability as does the Canon 20D...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the first &#8212; one of the Nikon DSLRs has an add-on to give it wireless capability as does the Canon 20D&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
