<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Showcases New HD Camcorder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/sony-showcases-new-hd-camcorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/sony-showcases-new-hd-camcorder/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fungku</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/sony-showcases-new-hd-camcorder/#comment-52517</link>
		<dc:creator>fungku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-52517</guid>
		<description>$1700 isnt bad for a HD camera, but there are some other HD cameras, with less features, selling for about $800.  I think Sharp has one they announced at CES 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$1700 isnt bad for a HD camera, but there are some other HD cameras, with less features, selling for about $800.  I think Sharp has one they announced at CES 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/sony-showcases-new-hd-camcorder/#comment-52516</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-52516</guid>
		<description>Ouch. High definition = huge budget required. I&#039;ve got less chance of getting this than of getting a 60&quot; HDTV. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, could be worth a try I suppose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matt&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://gadgets.candyham.com&quot;&quot;&gt;http://gadgets.candyham.com&quot;&lt;/a&gt; title=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://gadgets.candyham.com&quot;&quot;&gt;http://gadgets.candyham.com&quot;&lt;/a&gt; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://gadgets.candyham.com&quot;&gt;http://gadgets.candyham.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. High definition = huge budget required. I&#039;ve got less chance of getting this than of getting a 60&#8243; HDTV. </p>
<p>Still, could be worth a try I suppose.</p>
<p>Matt<br />
 <a href="<a rel="nofollow" href="http://gadgets.candyham.com""></a><a href="http://gadgets.candyham.com" rel="nofollow">http://gadgets.candyham.com</a>&#8220; title=&#8221;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://gadgets.candyham.com""></a><a href="http://gadgets.candyham.com" rel="nofollow">http://gadgets.candyham.com</a>&#8220; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;><a rel="nofollow" href="http://gadgets.candyham.com">http://gadgets.candyham.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-14 10:32:34 -->
