Skip to main content

British woman nearly jailed for suggesting to ‘burn mosques’ on Facebook

facebookA British woman has narrowly avoided a jail sentence after a recent trial led to her eight-week suspended jail term and additional fine for suggesting on the social network that people help her “[burn] down some mosques.”

Michaela Turner, 24, was given the jail term (suspended for six months) and additional £145 fine ($227 USD) made up of two separate amounts: £85 ($133.48 U.S.) in legal costs, with an additional victim surcharge of £60 ($94.22 U.S.). Turner was brought to trial after Portsmouth magistrates were told about the bigoted comments she had made on Facebook following the death of a British soldier, Lee Rigby, in London last month.

Rigby was murdered in South-East London in late May, an incident that sparked an increase in Islamophobic incidents throughout the city. The man charged with the murder refused to answer to his legal name of Michel Adebolajo in court, announcing instead that he should be addressed as Mujahid Abu Hamza and repeatedly kissing a book that appeared to be a copy of the Qur’an.

Despite a statement from Rigby’s family calling for a cessation of the bigoted attacks – “We would like to emphasise that Lee would not want people to use his name as an excuse to carry out attacks against others,” they explained – Turner, who lives in Southsea, Hampshire, posted comments on Facebook including “Feeling like burning down some mosques in Portsmouth, anyone want to join me?”

According to Hugh Morgan, the court prosecutor for the case, Turner’s comments were “of the higher category of [their] type, given the circumstances in which this incident took place… To post such comments at any time would be unacceptable and have the potential to cause offense.”

In Turner’s defense, lawyer Rebecca Strong offered little beyond an apology. “She is extremely remorseful and ashamed of what happened,” Strong told the court. “She was with a friend, they were drinking [and] has watched some clips regarding what happened in Woolwich and she was extremely upset, as is most of the country at what happened.”

Strong said that Turner “fully accepts what she did and is very ashamed of what she said,” adding that she “knows she dealt with her feelings completely inappropriately and accepts it shouldn’t have been so public.” According to Strong, Turner also admitted that “her views were ill-informed with regard to burning down mosques,” which sounds like a slight understatement. “Alcohol had played a part in it, because she had been drinking.”

Nothing can prevent misguided users onto Facebook, but maybe the social network can add in some kind of inebriation test to prevent future errors of judgment. Still, it’s not Facebook’s job to watch what you say. People should display more restraint in sharing offensive comments with the world, especially when doing so can land them in court and possibly jail.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Graeme McMillan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A transplant from the west coast of Scotland to the west coast of America, Graeme is a freelance writer with a taste for pop…
Zuckerberg says it’s not Facebook’s job to worry about misleading political ads
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg leads a conversation on free expression at Georgetown University on October 17, 2019 in Washington, DC. The event was hosted by the university’s McCourt School of Public Policy and its Institute of Politics and Public Service

Mark Zuckerberg said that Facebook won't be banning political ads, even if they contain false information, during a speech at Georgetown University on Thursday.

The Facebook CEO argued that political advertising is more transparent on Facebook than anywhere else, and added that political ads are an essential form of free speech. "I don't think it's right for a private company to censor politicians," he said.

Read more
European court decides what Facebook can show to the rest of the world
facebook european union defamation remove globally wesley tingey 9z9fxr 7z k unsplash

A case against Facebook’s policies for removing posts in the European Court of Justice could have implications for users around the world. In the ruling published on Thursday, October 3, the court ruled that Facebook must remove content worldwide if the court determines that content to be illegal, despite the fact that different laws may mean that content isn’t illegal everywhere.

The ruling stems from a case of defamation brought by Eva Glawisching-Piesczek, an Austria Greens party chairperson. As politics on the social media platform tend to go, a user shared an article on Facebook with a slew of names. Glawisching-Piesczek requested that Facebook take down the post, which courts in Austria called defamatory, but the network refused.

Read more
Facebook launches new changes against hate and discrimination. Are they enough?
Facebook

Amid scandals over ad discrimination and hate speech, Facebook is launching a series of changes. Civil rights leader Laura Murphy recently finished the company’s second civil rights audit, and referred to the changes as a “systematic, cross-functional framework to address these issues over time.” Critics, however, have already voiced concerns that the platform isn’t doing enough to tackle the issues.

The report, the second following an initial report in December 2018, focuses on the social network’s enforcement against hate speech, discrimination in ads, and tackling of misinformation. A third and final report is expected to be released in early 2020. As part of the report, Murphy talked with more than 90 civil rights organizations, as well as Facebook leaders and policy teams. The report both identifies the changes Facebook is making and areas for further improvement.

Read more