Ello promises an ad-free social network that doesn’t mine your data

By David Nield September 28, 2014

ello promises ad free social network doesnt mine data — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Ello is a fledgling social network looking to pinch users disgruntled by the advertising and data mining carried out by the bigger sites. It’s clear, clean and ad-free, and it’s been picking up a lot of attention this week, particularly in the wake of a Facebook clampdown on the use of fake names. The only downside is that it’s currently an invite-only operation, so you’ll need to wait your turn to get started with Ello.

“Your social network is owned by advertisers,” runs the Ello manifesto. “Every post you share, every friend you make, and every link you follow is tracked, recorded, and converted into data. Advertisers buy your data so they can show you more ads. You are the product that’s bought and sold. We believe there is a better way.”

Still very much in beta, Ello has a work-in-progress feel about it. According to the most recent feature list you can upload content, comment on posts and mention other people using their handle, but there’s nothing as fancy as a news feed or a proper notification system. Interestingly, you can split the people you follow into “Friends” and “Noise” for easy management (handy if you want to be ‘friends’ with someone but never ever hear from them).

“We believe in audacity,” continue Ello’s developers in the site’s help pages. “We believe a social network can be a tool for empowerment. Not a tool to deceive, coerce, and manipulate — but a place to connect, create, and celebrate life. You are not a product.”

Without all those adverts, though, how does it make money? Ello wants to offer basic features for free and premium extras for a price, so you can chip in a few dollars for some special features further down the line. It’s too early to say whether Ello can make a dent in the Facebook and Twitter user numbers, but it’s an intriguing new take on what a social network can be.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Facebook

Contributor

Dave is a freelance journalist from Manchester in the north-west of England. He's been writing about technology since the…

Social Media

What does it take to make a social media network that doesn’t exploit users?

Jimmy Wales speaking

A few months ago, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales launched a new platform called WikiTribune Social – or WT:Social for short. Unlike Facebook, the Wikipedia social network isn’t designed to generate profit by leveraging user data. Thus far, it has a modest membership, but Wales doesn’t seem interested in jousting with Facebook. Instead, it sounds like he is hoping to offer a refuge from it.

Some critics have highlighted the ways certain social media sites are purposefully designed to be addictive. That can help make them successful, but it can take a toll on users. On the other hand, if a site isn't offering people a benefit, no one will use it. Facebook didn't start out with the goal of becoming the world's largest social media company -- in the beginning it was actually exclusionary. It only opened up to those with non-college and non-university email addresses two years after its founding.

Social Media

You’re probably seeing more social media propaganda, but don’t blame the bots

social media propaganda global disinformation study 2019 kayla velasquez 6xjl5 xq4g4 unsplash

Bots commonly shoulder the blame for social media propaganda, but a recent study out of the U.K. suggests not only that organized political misinformation campaigns have more than doubled in the last two years, but that bots take second place to human-run manipulation.

The Global Disinformation Order study, conducted by the University of Oxford, found evidence of social media manipulation by a government agency or political party in 70 countries, an increase from 48 in 2018 and 28 in 2017. The study has been collecting data annually since 2017, but suggests political propaganda has leveraged social media for the last decade.

Social Media

Period-tracking apps are sharing people’s intimate data with Facebook

Some period-tracking apps are sending Facebook personal information about the women who use them.
In order to work, the apps require women to enter information about their menstrual cycle as well as information about their sexual activity. According to a report released Monday by the United Kingdom-based advocacy group Privacy International, a number of those apps then share that information with Facebook, Buzzfeed reports.
Specifically, the group said the apps MIA Fem and Maya sent information about women’s use of contraception, when their monthly periods were, and whether or not they experienced symptoms like cramps and swelling to the social network.
For some perspective, the app Maya currently has over 5 million downloads. The makers of MIA say that it has more than 2 million users around the world. We've reached out to the developers of both apps for comment and additional details on how they use user data, but have yet to receive a response. Maya's owner, Plackal Tech, told Buzzfeed that it doesn't share any personally identifiable data or medical data with Facebook.
Data is being shared with Facebook through the social network’s Software Developer Kit (SDK). The SDK allows developers to collect user data so Facebook can show users targeted ads. Beyond being used for advertising, the data can also be collected by Facebook and used outside of the social network.
Facebook has reportedly reached out to the developers of both apps to discuss how they are potentially violating the company’s terms of service. Facebook requires app developers to disclosed to users what information -- if any -- is being shared with Facebook. In the case of the two apps, it seems like that is not happening. The fault in this particular situation appears to be with the app developers, not the social network.
Privacy, in general, has been a growing concern as it pertains to Facebook, specifically following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5 billion over its use of private data in the wake of the scandal.
During court proceedings for a class-action lawsuit focused on Cambridge Analytica, the company’s lawyer, Orin Snyder, said that there is “no expectation of privacy” on Facebook.
“There is no invasion of privacy at all, because there is no privacy,” Snyder said while trying to convince U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria toss out the lawsuit. Snyder argued that users had given consent to share their data with third parties. “You have to closely guard something to have a reasonable expectation of privacy,” he said.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has made a number of statements over the past year stressing the company’s desire to make a privacy-focused social platform.