Skip to main content

Facebook makes it (slightly) easier to opt out of targeted ads

adchoices logoIf you’ve ever spent the day browsing for cheap plane tickets or scouting out the next Angry Birds installment, you’ve probably noticed ads on Facebook lining up with what you’ve been searching for on other sites.

If it seems kind of nefarious and Big Brother-y, that’s because it is: Facebook’s own ads and the ads it serves through its fledgling FBX ad exchange often tailor what they show you based on data they collect, including your ZIP code and browsing history.

The Digital Advertising Alliance came up with an “AdChoices” logo to help people suss out when they’re seeing targeted ads, but up until now, Facebook hasn’t joined in and provided the blue logo to its users.

But Mark Zuckerberg’s social media powerhouse is changing its tune, partially due to pressure from various ad agencies and advertisers. According to AdAge, you’ll soon be able to see which Facebook-administered ads are using your data.

If you drag your mouse over the tiny “x” in the right hand corner above Facebook’s ads, you will see whether or not it’s a pure coincidence the icon shows incredibly discounted airfare to Vegas or if Facebook figured out your plans to hit the strip by mining your data. You probably can’t see it yet if you log on to check it out today, since Facebook still has to update its code, but the change will go into effect by the end of the quarter.

What to do if you want to get rid of targeted ads on Facebook now? Well, as we mentioned, you’ll have to wait to get Facebook itself off your browsing trail, but if you have time and patience, you can get rid of most of its third-party partners by manually clicking over each of their ads.

When you drag your mouse over the upper-right “x” you’ll get a few options: You can hide one individual ad, you can find out more about the ad, or you can hide all advertisements from this particular advertising partner. Click “hide all,” and then prepare to spend an obnoxious chunk of time repeating these steps, because Facebook has a lot of ad partners.

This doesn’t mean you still won’t see ads that hew suspiciously close to your interests elsewhere, but it should minimize the amount you see when you’re cyberstalking your crush on Facebook.

And lest you think all targeted Facebook ads are forged in the fiery den of Satan, we’ll just remind you that a man used ads honing in on his geographic neighbors to find his missing cat.

Editors' Recommendations

Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Facebook says iOS 14’s new privacy tools could harm its ad business
apple ios 14 beta hands on review siri icon

Apple has made it even more difficult for developers to mine your data on iOS 14. One of the new additions prevents advertisers from covertly tracking you across nearly all apps and websites, and Facebook, for one, is not looking forward to it.

On Facebook’s second-quarter follow-up earnings call, David Wehner, the company’s chief financial officer, called the forthcoming update a “headwind” and said it will “make it harder for app developers and others to grow using ads on Facebook and, really, outside of Apple, to some extent.”

Read more
Facebook ad boycotters to Congress: Don’t let Zuckerberg off easy
mark zuckerberg thinking

The organizers of the #StopHateforProfit Facebook ad boycott have written a letter to the House Judiciary Committee asking the members to particularly press Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about the company’s alleged monopoly over the advertising sphere.
First reported by Axios, the letter suggests several pointed questions that lawmakers could ask: For instance, what percentage of U.S. digital ad spending runs through Facebook and its subsidiaries, what this means for small and medium businesses, and whether there are any alternatives for advertisers to reach certain demographics with the power and efficiency that Facebook uses. The questions seem intended to get at whether Facebook is truly the monopoly it claims not to be.
In June, several hundred major brands, including Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Starbucks, signed on with activist groups led by Common Sense Media, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League to remove their ads from Facebook for the month of July. This was an attempt, the groups said, the put pressure on Facebook to change its policies about hate speech and misinformation.

However, Facebook has proven resilient against so many big advertisers leaving its platform. Although MarketWatch reported that its stock tanked briefly in June when the boycott was announced, total ad revenue has remained basically steady throughout the boycott, according to Forbes. The social media giant is set to publish its second-quarter earnings report on Thursday, which should show whether the boycott had any kind of major effect on Facebook's bottom line.

Read more
Disney said to have significantly downsized spending on Facebook ads
disney projector drone disneyland

Walt Disney Co. has reportedly significantly reduced its planned advertising spending on Facebook, amid a growing boycott from major companies due to hate speech on the social network.

Disney is concerned about Facebook's enforcement of policies against objectionable content, sources familiar with the matter told the Wall Street Journal. They say that the company has paused advertising for Disney+, after heavily promoting the streaming service earlier this year on the social network. A source added that Disney has paused advertising for Hulu on Facebook-owned Instagram, while other divisions of the company are reviewing their plans.

Read more