Facebook-search-warrant-neoprint

Since 2008, Facebook has repeatedly allowed law-enforcement agents to access private account data without the user's knowledge, a new report shows.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange once called Facebook “the most appalling spying machine ever invented.” And based on a new report from Reuters, it seems as though he’s 100 percent right.

An extensive review of the Westlaw legal database by Reuters reveals that law-enforcement agencies are increasingly obtaining search warrants to snoop into users’ Facebook accounts, often without the users — or their Facebook friends — ever knowing that authorities had combed through their accounts.

Since 2008, federal judges have granted at least two dozen warrants to search users’ accounts, 11 of which were granted in 2011 alone. The agencies most often involved are the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Reuters reports that “the investigations range from arson to rape to terrorism.”

The information given up by Facebook to authorities includes the full range of activities: Wall posts, messages, status updates, links, videos, photos, calendar items and even rejected friend requests. This data comes in the form of “Neoprints” (a user’s total textual profile and activities) and “Photoprints” (snapshots of all photos a user has uploaded). Contact details, IP logs and group members are also included.

The terms of these warrants are posted in manuals, which appear to be created by Facebook. (An example of one of these manuals can be found here.) A Facebook representative would neither confirm nor deny whether the company created the manuals.

In none of the cases uncovered by Reuters did anyone challenge the legality of the searches, which could potentially violate citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights, the protection against unlawful search and seizure. The lack of challenges are likely because Facebook did not inform the users that their information was being accessed by law enforcement. This contrasts with Twitter’s policy to inform users when authorities have requested their private account information.

Facebook Chief Security Officer Joe Sullivan tells Reuters that the social network regularly pushes back against police “fishing expeditions.” He would not, however, comment on the number of searches that the company had allowed law enforcement to conduct.

Showing 44 comments

  1. Diane at 5:21pm 25th July 2011 My "neoprint" was handed over to my ex husband who is a police officer. There was nothing illegal in what I had on my private profile, yet my info and my "friends" info was handed over to him without my knowledge! If that can be done to an ex wife of a cop....what other rights are being violated?
  2. Donald Wiley Quixote at 1:09pm 13th July 2011 PIGs.
  3. Donald Wiley Quixote at 1:09pm 13th July 2011 PIGs.
  4. Damon Schmitt at 6:15am 13th July 2011 Seems to me that unless you are a serial rapist, arsonist, murderer, or other sort of incredibly nefarious scum, you've nothing to worry about. That isn't to say that you shouldn't be notified or anything.... I'm just going to throw it out there, I don't think you should terribly and violently wrong other people, but if you DO that sort of thing AND Facebook, THEN you need to worry about this.People will always feel like any form of investigation is invasive, and law enforcement will always feel like you get away with way too much. Let them do their job, just make sure they let people know what they did, so we that we know they're not abusing their positions.
  5. Damon Schmitt at 6:15am 13th July 2011 Seems to me that unless you are a serial rapist, arsonist, murderer, or other sort of incredibly nefarious scum, you've nothing to worry about. That isn't to say that you shouldn't be notified or anything.... I'm just going to throw it out there, I don't think you should terribly and violently wrong other people, but if you DO that sort of thing AND Facebook, THEN you need to worry about this.People will always feel like any form of investigation is invasive, and law enforcement will always feel like you get away with way too much. Let them do their job, just make sure they let people know what they did, so we that we know they're not abusing their positions.
  6. Damon Schmitt at 6:15am 13th July 2011 Seems to me that unless you are a serial rapist, arsonist, murderer, or other sort of incredibly nefarious scum, you've nothing to worry about. That isn't to say that you shouldn't be notified or anything.... I'm just going to throw it out there, I don't think you should terribly and violently wrong other people, but if you DO that sort of thing AND Facebook, THEN you need to worry about this.People will always feel like any form of investigation is invasive, and law enforcement will always feel like you get away with way too much. Let them do their job, just make sure they let people know what they did, so we that we know they're not abusing their positions.
  7. Nancy Wilkens at 4:39am 13th July 2011 I've had my passwords hacked before. Can you really convict anyone of a crime based on a facebook page, or a tweet? I could have doubt about who posted what, and when ...
  8. Nancy Wilkens at 4:39am 13th July 2011 I've had my passwords hacked before. Can you really convict anyone of a crime based on a facebook page, or a tweet? I could have doubt about who posted what, and when ...
  9. Nancy Wilkens at 4:39am 13th July 2011 I've had my passwords hacked before. Can you really convict anyone of a crime based on a facebook page, or a tweet? I could have doubt about who posted what, and when ...
  10. Laini Tsang at 4:12am 13th July 2011 Why is it a surprise?
  11. Laini Tsang at 4:12am 13th July 2011 Why is it a surprise?
  12. Laini Tsang at 4:12am 13th July 2011 Why is it a surprise?
  13. Shane Berzins at 1:53am 13th July 2011 wow... it took Digital Trends THAT long to figure it out?
  14. Shane Berzins at 1:53am 13th July 2011 wow... it took Digital Trends THAT long to figure it out?
  15. Shane Berzins at 1:53am 13th July 2011 wow... it took Digital Trends THAT long to figure it out?
  16. Joe Hana at 1:53am 13th July 2011 No, not real...I was just a bit sarcastic ;-)
  17. Ging Camacho at 1:50am 13th July 2011 Digital Trends too early to say but someone will have to up the ante.
  18. Ging Camacho at 1:50am 13th July 2011 Digital Trends too early to say but someone will have to up the ante.
  19. Ging Camacho at 1:50am 13th July 2011 Digital Trends too early to say but someone will have to up the ante.
  20. Ging Camacho at 1:48am 13th July 2011 Some people are forgetting we signed up here at our own risk. It's either you are in or you are out.
  21. Albano Nano at 1:30am 13th July 2011 Digital Trends My opinion: No
  22. Rizwan Azim at 1:23am 13th July 2011 Facebook has announced that it will begin scanning all users' pictures with facial recognition software, allowing the site to automatically recognize users' faces and identify them in photos. This service, like many of Facebook's previous changes, is automatically active for all users, so the only way to avoid it is to opt out. Thing is, it has the potential to make your face appear tagged in photos that you may not want to be associated with. This isn't the first time always Facebook has been under fire for privacy issues !
  23. Digital Trends at 1:22am 13th July 2011 Does anyone honestly believe Google would be any different than Facebook on privacy issues?
  24. Digital Trends at 1:22am 13th July 2011 Does anyone honestly believe Google would be any different than Facebook on privacy issues?
  25. Albano Nano at 12:55am 13th July 2011 What?? There is no privacy.. Now Mark Zuckerberg and his evil friends know where we are living, what we are thinking, what we are doing... EVERYTHING ABOUT US!!
  26. Albano Nano at 12:55am 13th July 2011 What?? There is no privacy.. Now Mark Zuckerberg and his evil friends know where we are living, what we are thinking, what we are doing... EVERYTHING ABOUT US!!
  27. Joe Hana at 12:37am 13th July 2011 Yeah, lets head over to Google+ - they are propably better ;-)
  28. Ging Camacho at 12:36am 13th July 2011 thank you for protecting the FB community
  29. Ging Camacho at 12:36am 13th July 2011 thank you for protecting the FB community
  30. Waway Yare at 12:19am 13th July 2011 no longer a secret...XD
  31. Mike Itsbatmansilly at 12:18am 13th July 2011 there will be those that will argue from a position of fear that this is an acceptable broach of privacy. Don't be folled. the media creates a climate of fear of terrorist, of child molesters, and worse in order to placate us into accepting these vile infringements on our rights. stand up for change. call for an end to borders, to media lies, to governmental abuse.
  32. Tom Pajak at 12:17am 13th July 2011 NOTHING in this world is private.....when you go online and post anything it no longer belongs to you...when will people learn....you're living by the NEW WORLD ORDER rules of governing
  33. Nicholas Takeyama at 12:16am 13th July 2011 f it
  34. Ian Bell at 5:15pm 12th July 2011 If you have nothing to hide, do not do illegal activities or stalk people, then what do you have to worry about? I am all about privacy too, but if you want something to truly be private, don't tell anyone. Do not post it on a site you do not own, do not broadcast it to the world. Listen folks, these laws are designed to HELP you. They stop predators, stop bullying by students and stop terrorists. Think about the pros and the cons....is it worth it? It is to me.
    1. Rusty Shackleford at 5:25pm 12th July 2011 Right. I'll just put a camera in the bathroom and watch you because you're not doing anything wrong, so no big deal, right?
      1. Ian Bell at 6:21pm 12th July 2011 I like how you are generalizing the topic. Remember, they are sharing your data with law enforcement, not your neighbor... ;)
    2. Andrew Couts at 6:07pm 12th July 2011 Are you the FBI? Because that sounds exactly like the kind of argument the FBI would make.
      1. Ian Bell at 6:20pm 12th July 2011 You assume that Facebook would share my user data to law enforcement for no good reason. Remember, Facebook is sharing it with law enforcement....not random users, foreign countries, MPAA, RIAA etc. And if law enforcement is asking Facebook for your info, then I'm sure there is a good reason.
        1. CatsAreGods at 8:40pm 12th July 2011 "Sure, there's always a good reason." The police are always right and never make mistakes? Did you miss all the headlines where they keep doing military-style raids on the wrong house and kill dogs and people? We have a Fourth Amendment for this very reason, and that's why a responsible service provider will only hand over your information based on a court order, signed by a judge...not just a simple request by law enforcement.
          1. Ian Bell at 9:30pm 12th July 2011 You must not have read the article: "Since 2008, federal judges have granted at least two dozen warrants to search users’ accounts, 11 of which were granted in 2011 alone." Judges granted the warrants. Facebook did not just hand over information, they required a judge request it. They were/are not just simple requests by law enforcement.
            1. dang206 at 10:21pm 12th July 2011 Pretty much the same thing going on here as any other place in history. Hell, if you are up to no good, they can go to your work and go through your email, work computer, etc without you knowing. They don't have to tell you. They just need to convince a judge. I don't see a difference between facebook and some physical location.
  35. Ian Bell at 5:15pm 12th July 2011 If you have nothing to hide, do not do illegal activities or stalk people, then what do you have to worry about? I am all about privacy too, but if you want something to truly be private, don't tell anyone. Do not post it on a site you do not own, do not broadcast it to the world. Listen folks, these laws are designed to HELP you. They stop predators, stop bullying by students and stop terrorists. Think about the pros and the cons....is it worth it? It is to me.
  36. Wayne Gafford at 12:14am 13th July 2011 O.K., HOW MANY OF US HERE ARE GOING TO HEAR"POLICE, OPEN THE DOOR!!!" BEFORE THE "FLASH & BANG" BECAUSE OF OUT PROFILES!!! THIS WRONG ON SO MANY LEVELS!!! there are those of us that may have a few problems but give time we will take care of them.Please Face Book, at least give a person the understanding that we are safe for a minute...
  37. Paul Brittain-Morby at 12:07am 13th July 2011 OK enough is enough. Its time to say good-bye to facebook.
Close Suggestion Email could use a revamp, not a replacement
View Article