Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Facebook changes ‘Hide All’ to ‘Unfollow,’ shaming us for ignoring annoying friends

Add as a preferred source on Google

There are always going to be those Facebook posts we don’t want to see; the Nth baby photo, the Instagram-pushed food porn, the vaguebook status updates. The people behind them, however, we don’t want to go whole hog and defriend … just be able to black bar their occasionally aggravating posts.

To this end, Facebook introduced “Hide All,” an option that appeared via drop down menu that let you get rid of a user’s obnoxious updates without getting rid of them. There were other options, too, like requesting Facebook only show you important posts from these people (engagements, new jobs, new homes, etc).

Recommended Videos

Now, Facebook has made a minor change, but one that might feel significant: Instead of the “Hide All” option, you now can only “Unfollow” your friends. You could also opt to say you just don’t like a specific post, and why, or get all notifications for a post – but the big change here is the “Unfollow.”

Unfollow doesn’t mean you’re defriending this person. Instead, you’re just not going to get anymore updates from them. No one knows you’ve unfollowed them, but it is a cut and dry way to silence someone entirely, and the language change from “Hide All” to “Unfollow” seems to be making users feel … well, a little mean about censoring their annoying Facebook friends.

“We are making a small update to the options people have to customize News Feed. Previously, people could hide all updates from a particular friend or Page if they didn’t want to see any more posts from them,” a Facebook spokesperson tells me. “For example, you could hide updates from a person by selecting ‘Hide all from Jane Smith.’ Going forward, this will work in the same way but the language will change to ‘Unfollow Jane Smith.’ This means you are still friends, but updates from that person won’t appear in your News Feed. The goal of this change is to help people curate their News Feed and see more of the content that they care about.”

Of course, some of those previously mentioned options for seeing a certain amount of someone in your News Feed are now gone – but if you take the time the put them in Facebook’s pre-made lists, then you’ll accomplish (probably) whatever it was Facebook was doing for you anyway. If you only want to see the important things from someone, throw them into your Acquaintances list, and it could solve the trick. Or create your own list of “people I only sometimes want to see updates from,” and then the problem is certainly solved. 

But I get it: We’re lazy, we’ve been coddled, and the News Feed frustration is never-ending. Losing options always hurts. 

Facebook’s White Whale is the News Feed, and whatever curation tips it can glean from users, it will glean. As it grows larger – and that means its user base, ad sales, ad placements, promoted posts, sponsored stories, and updated posted all increase – the platform needs all the help it can get weeding through the noise to find them gems for each individual user. No two News Feeds should be the same, and because the amount of information flowing in is so high, Facebook has to look to us for help dissecting it. This is just one more way the social network can pick and choose what goes in our News Feed; if we Unfollow someone, it’s one less signal to have to measure.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Topics
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more
X Money is finally here, and it’s much more than a digital wallet
The new financial service aims to turn X into an app where users can pay, save, spend, and send money.
X Money featured

Elon Musk's vision of turning X into an "everything app" has taken another major step forward. The company has officially begun rolling out X Money to Premium and Premium+ subscribers in the United States. Rather than being just another digital wallet, X Money is designed as a full-fledged financial hub built directly into the social platform, allowing users to send money, receive payments, hold cash, earn interest, and spend through a Visa debit card—all without leaving the X app.

What is X Money, and who is it for?

Read more