Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Google+ now lets you use a fake name

Add as a preferred source on Google

Some of you may recall that there was a bit of a hoo-ha over Google’s no-fake-name policy when Google+ launched three years ago. And it never really went away.

The Web giant was so antsy about the rule that it accidentally kicked William Shatner off its then fledgling social networking site in the belief that it wasn’t really William Shatner. But it was. The former captain of the Starship Enterprise subsequently had his account restored.

Recommended Videos

In an about-face, the Mountain View company on Tuesday surprised many by giving the green light for account holders to use any darn name they like – as long as it hasn’t been taken, of course. Whether it’s silly, weird, non-sensical, or just plain bonkers, Google+ will now welcome you and your made-up name with open arms.

‘No more restrictions’

In a post on its site, the company said that after relaxing the policy gradually over the last couple of years (including allowing +Page owners to use any name and letting YouTube users bring their usernames into Google+), it had decided to take the final step, announcing that “there are no more restrictions on what name you can use.”

“We know you’ve been calling for this change for a while,” the post said. “We know that our names policy has been unclear, and this has led to some unnecessarily difficult experiences for some of our users.” Though hopefully Shatner’s over it by now.

“For this we apologize, and we hope that today’s change is a step toward making Google+ the welcoming and inclusive place that we want it to be.”

If you think the elimination of the naming restriction means that trolls will now be stripping down to their underpants to sit at their PC and fill Google+ (and YouTube) with comments ranging from unpleasant to bilious, the site’s chief architect, Yonatan Zunger, is reassuring users that “one of the reasons this is safe to launch is that our troll-smashing department has gotten very good at their job.”

The Web company will be hoping that by lifting the naming restriction on Google+ it’ll be able to boost its user base by attracting new members who were previously put off by the idea of having to use their real name.

So, were you a fan of the old rule? Sad to see it go? Sound off in the comments below.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
WhatsApp finally fixes one of its biggest storage headaches with this new cleanup tool
whatsapp-disappearing-messages-after-reading-timer

If your phone's storage keeps mysteriously shrinking, WhatsApp channels might be part of the reason. Photos, videos, voice notes, and other media shared by channels can pile up in the background, and until now, cleaning them out hasn't exactly been a pleasant experience. That's finally changing.

WhatsApp is rolling out a new storage cleanup tool for channel media, giving Android beta users a much simpler way to free up space without digging through endless files one by one. The feature was first spotted in development a couple of months ago, and it's now beginning to reach select beta testers through the latest WhatsApp beta for Android update.

Read more
Meta used AI to make your Instagram feed harder to quit
Meta says its latest AI recommendation sytems are keeping people on Instagram longer by serving up more relevant Reels and Feed posts.
Instagram open on iPhone

Caught yourself scrolling on Instagram a lot longer lately? You're not imagining it. Meta just told investors what's driving that trend, and AI is at the center of it.

During its second-quarter earnings call, Meta said time spent on Instagram grew by double digits year over year after rolling out new AI-powered recommendation systems. According to the company, the biggest gains came from improvements to how it recommends Reels and other public content, making it easier to surface videos people are more likely to watch.

Read more
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more