New social network Unthink says ‘FU’ to Facebook and Google+

unthink-invitation

Dubbed the "anti-Facebook," newly launched social network Unthink aims to free users from the bonds of corporate money-making by giving them complete control over their personal data.

There’s a new social network in town, and it bills itself as everything Facebook’s not. Unthink.com, which opened up registration today for an initial round of beta users, says it is the “anti-Facebook,” and vows to give users complete control over their personal data.

Unthink, which is based in Tampa, Florida, came out swinging, with a manifesto that vows to “emancipate social media,” along with a promotional video that literally says “FU” to Facebook and Google+ for making money by “spying – yes, spying” on users and bombarding users with ads, among other grievances.

According to Unthink chief executive Natasha Dedis, the idea for a new kind of social network came to her in 2007, when her son asked to join Facebook. After reading Facebook’s terms and conditions, as well as the terms of MySpace (which reigned king of social media at the time), Dedis said in an interview with SixEstate that she realized that these companies were operating under a business logic that was “totally irrational and exploitative.”

“…I felt that they were basically taking my son hostage,” said Dedis. “He was giving them a perpetual license to do whatever they wanted, they could change the terms at any time. So I thought, ‘Oh my god, in the real world, no business could ask its clients to enter into such a legal relationship. So how is this even legal on the Web?’ It just baffled me.”

Unthink attempts to tackle the exploitation problem in a number of different ways. First, Unthink makes all user data private by default. Users may then allow others to see the information they want public, and keep private anything they want private. Next, Unthink doesn’t sell user data to companies. Instead, users can choose to have specific brands “sponsor” their pages. Any users who don’t want corporate sponsorship can pay a $2-a-year fee to use the service. In addition, Unthink users may choose how brands communicate with them via a section that’s totally separate from their regular information stream.

As we see it, Unthink faces an inconceivably difficult uphill battle against Facebook and Google+. At the same time, however, Unthink’s servers are, at the time of this writing, completely overwhelmed by the bombardment of traffic headed to the site today. While some may see that as evidence that the company is unprepared for the big leagues, it at least shows that people are interested in a Facebook alternative – something we saw in droves with the launch of Google+.

We’ll definitely be exploring Unthink more in the coming days. In the mean time, check out Unthink’s in-your-face promo video, and let us know what you think of, er, Unthink:

Showing 13 comments

  1. jesterking at 7:27am 27th October 2011 It worked for me... clicked the link. I'm going to create an account with fake info and read their terms. I'll see if I can post it on here for you all to read.
  2. bxxxxxxc at 12:01pm 26th October 2011 hmmm? Its down! They REALLY do mean "Everything Facebook's NOT"!
  3. Pramod Patil at 5:10pm 26th October 2011 Clicked the link, and got "UNTHINK is over capacity. Please try again later." Don,t think I will.
  4. Mike Dunn at 10:08am 26th October 2011 I'm pretty sure almost every online company's Terms and Conditions allow them to change the terms whenever they want. This isn't always done to screw the user, but also as a way to evolve the company, if a new feature comes out they need to be able to update the terms to reflect that. I can't see Unthink being able to write up some terms that will never need to be updated, no matter how big they company becomes.
    1. jesterking at 7:26am 27th October 2011 Yeah, tell that to Sony with their PS3 terms...
  5. Chad Mason at 10:01am 26th October 2011 Clicked the link, and got "UNTHINK is over capacity. Please try again later." Don,t think I will.
  6. Chris Johnson at 4:52pm 26th October 2011 Interesting. There are two problems I foresee: The first – and it’s already been touched upon – is that people are lazy. I don’t want to go through and decide what companies I want to “sponsor” my site; I also don’t want to spend $2 a year (despite how little it is) for a service that I already use for free, especially since it’s going to take at least two years for this site to get traction and then another year for people to migrate (assuming it works). People didn’t migrate to G+, people won’t migrate here. The second is that if a ton of people opt out of getting companies to sponsor their page, this company is going to find that $2 a year doesn’t cover the cost of keeping your Servers up, nor does it pay the people who will maintain the servers, network, and everything else required for this infrastructure. Because of this, I see this site going to a, “Well, we either need to raise our prices (Netflix)” or “we need to simply allow a few more sites to look at your page or we’re only going to sell certain aspects” which means this site becomes Facebook. Honestly? While we know our information isn’t private and we’re more or less owned by Facebook, how many people really care? I sincerely doubt Facebook will want any of my pictures; my information is boring at best, and if I came up with a revolutionary idea or thought? Well, I sure as hell wouldn’t post it on Facebook. There have always been "rival sites" to complete with what's popular and they've all failed. This is a great concept on paper but will falter in production.
  7. David Essex at 4:44pm 26th October 2011 sigh...
  8. Shawn Brown at 4:20pm 26th October 2011 Haha. I actually do read them because it's part of my job, but I know how people are too. If this takes off and takes down Facebook or even takes a quarter of their users, then I will say I was wrong. Docjuli, do you think Unthink is going to do well?
  9. Gautam Doddamani at 4:03pm 26th October 2011 hahaha
  10. Shawn Brown at 3:57pm 26th October 2011 Good idea, but honestly most people don't care or want to have to choose ads. This is why Google failed too. These new networks come out and offer one different thing and expect to be more popular than Facebook. Let's face it, the generations are getting lazier and you really need to wow them if you want people to go to a different network.
  11. docjuli at 8:56am 26th October 2011 Good to know some people still read Terms & Condition.
  12. Mike Hogan at 3:49pm 26th October 2011 And apparently already over capacity...lol
Close Suggestion 20 percent of U.S. consumers research products on Facebook before purchasing
View Article