Most patients are comfortable sharing social media with their doctors

By Christina Majaski November 3, 2015

patients social media doctors doctor and tablet — NEC Corporation of America / Flickr (Creative Commons)

In an age where Internet surfers are increasingly concerned about privacy matters and keeping their online lives separate from real life, it turns out that when it comes to medical information, most people are okay with the two merging. In fact, according to a recent Reuters report, as many as 71 percent of 5,000 patients asked in a study, published in the medical journal BMJ Quality and Safety, were perfectly fine with letting their doctors view their social media activity.

In the study, researchers determined that what we share online leaves clues into our attitudes and activities, which influence our health. Our activity on Facebook and Twitter can provide information on the beginning stages of disease, how patients manage medical conditions, and if there are links to disease progression, says Dr. Raina Merchant, director of the Penn Medicine Social Media and Health Innovation Lab. In an email to Reuters, she adds, “This information is in the form of posts, check-ins, photos, and other data,” providing a picture of our overall health.

Also noted in the study, younger patients who were active on social media and insured through private health plans, were more trusting and more likely to grant access to their accounts. Among patients who did not want to share their social media with doctors, the primary reason cited was privacy concerns and the fear that their online identity could affect their employment. This is a realistic concern, considering that breaches, such as the recent UCLA hack of over 4.5 million medical records, do occur.

While the time when our social media profiles can be useful in identifying and diagnosing health concerns might seem far off, giving social media access to doctors and medical health providers might already be able to save lives or deliver better care. Twitter and Facebook data is already being used in the medical field to rate hospitals according to trustworthiness, patient care, and satisfaction, and as a method of communicating with health care professionals from home.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Christina Majaski

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Christina has written for print and online publications since 2003. In her spare time, she wastes an exorbitant amount of…

Social Media

What is Section 230? Inside the legislation protecting social media

social media on phone

A little known piece of legislation called Section 230 is making headlines after President Donald Trump's latest effort to repeal the legislation, demanding that Congress fold that repeal in with another round of stimulus checks, defense spending, and the massive bill that keeps the lights on in Washington D.C. It seems politicians are alwasy struggling to wrap their heads around social media and "Big Tech," a silly term for the technology giants that have defined the modern era.

It's not the first time Section 230 made waves, of course. Trump signed an executive order in May that targeted social media platforms and the content on their sites, aiming to remove the protections of Section 230 in the Communications Decency Act. By repealing Section 230, social networks would be legally responsible for what people post on their platforms. The law that protects speech over the internet has been around for more than 20 years, but has been targeted by politicians of both major parties, including Democratic president-elect Joe Biden.

Social Media

2020 forced Big Social to address its flaws, but it’s too late for an easy fix

The phrase "out of the frying pan, into the fire" is an incredibly apt description of the plight of the internet's social media giants in 2020. Already grappling to settle into their increasingly large roles in democracy and culture, social networks like Facebook and Twitter suddenly gained an even bigger role in our daily lives as the coronavirus pandemic took hold. In the face of this extra pressure, they had no choice but to adapt.

While these forced adaptations were no doubt difficult for the companies involved, the resulting changes have arguably been good ones -- not only for individual users, but for the world at large.
Too many fires to put out
When the COVID-19 pandemic took hold, social media was a natural fallback. People turned to their online networks for community updates, virtual hangouts, news, entertainment, and more. Giants such as Facebook and Twitter faced a fresh coronavirus-related “infodemic,” while at the same time, an urgent responsibility hung on their shoulders to police an influx of controversial political content from President Donald Trump and many others who were quickly racking up huge follower counts.

Social Media

Practically every major social app has a Stories function now. This is why

instagram launches location stories to more users 1

When Snapchat introduced the ability to post disappearing text and media over half a decade ago, no one expected that a scruffy new startup’s headlining feature would end up consuming a row of space at the top of every other social platform in a few years. But that’s exactly what has happened.

Snapchat’s Stories has flourished into a social network staple, and now the world's biggest tech companies are clamoring to bake this breakout format into their offerings. Today, a familiar row of avatars sits above all else on some of the most popular apps. You can now post these ephemeral “Stories” on Twitter, Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, Pinterest, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Google (for publishers), and possibly even Spotify in the near future.