Along with religion, politics can be a touchy subject for polite conversation in the real world, and new research shows our online social lives mirror our real world behaviors – politics and social networking sites have an uneasy relationship, according to a new survey from the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life project.
The survey was completed in February 2012 and combed information from 2,253 Americans, age 18 and over. Some introductory numbers Pew found: 80 percent of Americans use the Internet, 66 percent of those Americans use a social networking site, and of those people, 75 percent say that their friends post some sort of political content.
While some political analysts have criticized social networking sites and the Internet for being responsible for creating political echo chambers, the Pew survey seems to show that this echo chamber viewpoint may be too harsh of a conclusion. Pew found that only 25 percent of social networking users always or mostly agree with the political content posted by friends.
The survey seemed to suggest that SNS users friendship “are not centered on political discussion and that many networks are not built with ideological compatibility as a core organizing principle.” Users seem to shy away from political confrontation; 73 percent say they sometimes, or never agree with friends political postings, and 66 percent of those people who don’t see eye-to-eye with their friends on politics tend to ignore those posts. A fifth (22 percent) of social networking users actively censor themselves politically for fear of upsetting or offending one of their social network friends.
Interestingly, a good portion of users have been surprised by their friends’ political leanings. The survey found that 38 percent of SNS users learned their friends held different political
beliefs than they thought; this typically happened with Democrats, liberals as well as those with very conservative views.
And if you’ve ever thought of unfriending someone for being too political zealous, you’re not alone. At least 18 percent of social networking site users have decided to block, unfriend or hide someone based on politics. Usually, the top reasons for unfriending are for hyper-frequent political posting, for offensive posts, or for argumentative behavior. Typically the blocked friend was a distant friend, an acquaintance or someone they’ve never met in the real world. Demographic-wise, liberals tend to block more: 28 percent of liberals have blocked, unfriended or hidden, while only 16 percent of conservatives and 14 percent of moderates have acted this way.
These numbers don’t necessarily mean that politics is taboo. Social networking sites can still be a hot bed of political conversation, according to Pew, “especially during campaign seasons.” Politico’s recent team up with Facebook to measure GOP candidate buzz somewhat confirms Pew’s point. 47 percent of SNS users have hit the “like” button to affirm a friends political comment and 16 percent have friended or followed someone based on similar political views: Democrats tend to affirm more with comments than Republicans or Independents. All in all, the Pew survey says that “friends sometimes agree and sometimes disagree,” inside social networking sites, but tend to ignore any little political blips of annoyance to continue on with friendships.
Via Pew Internet
couldn’t care less…
Wouldn’t be the least bit surprised about it. But im wondering what side does it more often?
I’m not at all shocked however I am deeply saddened by it. I admit i do use facebook as somewhat of a soapbox but only for issues that i believe are absolutely critical. I generally avoid armchair politics and partisan arguments as i find those discussions pointless and divisive, however when there is an event or politician involved with a major affront to established rights then I believe that it is irresponsible not to discuss it. The best way to spread an idea is to start with the people that are closest to you and for some people that circle is captured easily on facebook. That being said there is a right way and a wrong way to go about it. Simply expressing obtuse opinions without heed to any other opinion rightfully deserves censorship from friends and family however when there is the potential for a dialectic or constructive debate then these exchanges should be encouraged. The reality of politics is that change never happens unless enough people are uncomfortable.
couldn’t care less…
Respect is waning for differing opinions in this society. We all learn from each other if we just listen and stop talking.
I think there’s a difference between being opinionated and being combative. I’ve unfriended a couple of people because they started gratuitously attacking me, acting more like trolsl than anything else. But I’ve had people unfriend ME for for less, like asking them to stop commenting on a post I’d made, because they didn’t understand what was going on between the people involved. Someone once unfriended me because she found out that I did not share her anti-vaccination opinions.
I agree. It’s one thing to have a respectable disagreement. It’s quite another to go on the attack.
There is a person in my family who seems to enjoy name-calling if he finds out a person has different political views than him. It’s sad watching a person in their 60s act like a 5-year-old.
It’s because those two subjects are most likely to trigger a sudden flame fight than any others. Since so many of us are conditioned to have an angry, knee-jerk prejudiced response to certain phrases and talking points, you risk alienating people just by HAVING any opinion at all. I try to keep my rants limited to issues of free speech and copyright issues, but even such a seemingly non-offensive area of discussion recently put me in the uncomfortable position of having to defend Rush Limbaugh’s right to be a douche nozzle. It’s just the world we live in. You can’t have an opinion on anything without making someone angry, so the non-confrontational approach is to have no opinion.
I think it is important to stand up for what I belief in or think is important. So for me it is part of social media to share about politics and also religion. I am aware that some friends do not like to see or read it, but that’s life, we can not all have the same views, ideas or convictions, but we can share them, discuss them with respect and learn to understand each other at least.
So you prefer to hide your beliefs so people like you?
Well two things people do not really like discussing is religion and politics. I like the topics but I prefer not conversing about them on social sites.
What a pointless article…
Pew pew lasers?
so…