Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Snapchat (sort of) admits your old picture data doesn’t exactly disappear

Add as a preferred source on Google
snapchat_ss-618x400
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Confirming what Decipher Forensics researcher Richard Hickman told Digital Trends last week, Snapchat admitted on its blog that your snaps don’t just disappear into the impenetrable ether of the Internet.

The bulk of the blog post downplayed the potential for re-discovering photos, and noted that Snapchat deletes seen snaps from both its servers and sends instructions to delete snaps to phones.

Recommended Videos

“So … you know … keep that in mind before putting any state secrets in your selfies.”

Digital Trends discussed this update with Hickman, who hasn’t made contact with Snapchat but said the blog post likely sprang from the publicity his research received. “Yes, I think that Snapchat is downplaying my research. I don’t blame them either, this is bad for them. However, not everything they have posted is accurate from what I have found so far. They say that after a snap is viewed that it is deleted from temporary memory, however, in every instance that I have tested, it is not. That is not to say that in other instances they are not deleted, because more testing is necessary.”

So Hickman thinks Snapchat’s not being totally accurate. At least they’re admitting to something – right at the tail end of the blog post, Snapchat snuck what amounts to an admission in: “Also, if you’ve ever tried to recover lost data after accidentally deleting a drive or maybe watched an episode of CSI, you might know that with the right forensic tools, it’s sometimes possible to retrieve data after it has been deleted. So … you know … keep that in mind before putting any state secrets in your selfies.”

The fact that the company admitted that you can potentially recover deleted data highlights the fact that researchers like Hickman poked a hole in their claim to impermanence that no amount of nudie pics can fill.

And that said, you’re probably OK sending semi-scandalous pictures on Snapchat, as long as you’re sending it to someone sane enough to question the value of shelling out the hundreds of dollars Decipher Forensics asks for to dig up an old picture. Maybe if a company comes out with really cheap recovery tools, you’d be wise to forego Snapchatting anything remotely scandalous altogether – until then, you’ll have to use your own common sense. Just don’t document your illegal exploits with the app and you should be fine, since the most obvious way this Snapchat resurrection may be used is to aid law enforcement.

Kate Knibbs
Former Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more
Bluesky now has a feature to save you from accidentally going viral. I want it everywhere.
Bluesky now lets users opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed.
Social profile page of Bluesky.

There's a specific kind of dread that comes with posting something small and watching it explode to a million strangers who missed all the context. Thankfully, Bluesky just built an escape hatch to avoid this horror. The platform now lets you opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed, meaning your posts stop getting pushed to people who don't already follow you.

How Bluesky's algorithmic opt-out feature works

Read more
Meta’s new teen restrictions will only apply to users in the US for now
Facebook and Instagram teens are getting new limits on screen time and content
Facebook logo on iPhone

Meta is implementing new restrictions on U.S. teens who use Facebook and Instagram, but the changes could have repercussions far beyond U.S. screens. Meta’s new protections come after a series of settlements relating to allegations that social media sites endanger children, with the company facing as much as $18 billion in expenses.

For now, the new rules will be applied only to U.S. users. The measures include limitations on how long younger users can spend on Meta’s apps and limits on their ability to disable certain safety settings, Bloomberg reported. The company says it will watch the changes and continue discussions with governments elsewhere.

Read more