Skip to main content

These are the sites you’re wasting time on while at work

black friday cyber monday onlineshoppers targeted by hackers frustrated worker phil gradwell
Image used with permission by copyright holder

You’re going to finish reading that company memo. And you’re going to send those very important emails. It’s going to be an extremely productive day… but first you need to see if anyone retweeted you. And then just double-check to make sure your college roommate hasn’t written you back yet on Facebook. And then… and then… it’s 11 a.m. and you’re pretty sure you just got paid for looking at listicles about the world’s most adorable inter-species friendships for two hours. 

According to Forbes, 64 percent of employees visit non-work websites every day, while 29 percent waste one to two hours of work each week. They’re not the worst procrastination culprits, though, since 21 percent waste two to five hours, eight percent waste six to 10 hours, and a comically unproductive three percent waste more than 10 hours each week. 

The site most likely to make employees forget about that stack of papers on their desk: Tumblr. 

Since the site serves as a platform for engaged, enthusiastic digital communities, it seems people who use Tumblr can’t resist its siren song during their working hours. The next most popular website to browse on the clock is Facebook, which shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has ever worked in an office. Other culprits include Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat, so access to social media is certainly a time suck. 

In addition to looking at which sites are most often used as distractions from meaningless toil, Forbes also surveyed workers to find out why they wasted time. 34 percent of employees said not being challenged was the main reason they slipped into unproductive habits, while 30 percent said they were unsatisfied with their work and 23 percent said they were straight-up bored. Disturbingly, 25 percent of adults admitted to looking at pornographic material on a computer at work. And that’s just who admitted to it. 

This might seem like whining, and yes, there are many, many boring jobs that people need to do in order to keep a functional society operating. But 32 percent cited a lack of incentive as their impetus into Internet dillydallying, so here’s a thought: This situation requires making people want to be less lazy at their work. If the worker is truly disposable, employers could curtail this type of behavior by simply firing people more frequently for their digital malfeasance. If it is not cost-efficient to continually fire people and train new ones, however, employers are not likely to adopt draconian methods to cut down on this time-wasting. Also, since many employees have access to their personal mobile devices, it would be hard to enforce a no-personal Internet policy, if not impossible in certain workspaces.

The main offending group of Internet-obsessed workers were, to the surprise of absolutely no one, Millennials. While that’s fodder for another three billion op-eds about why the youth of  today are the worst, it’s also a sign that this is something employers are going to see more of, since whatever generation will follow the Millennial and take up the yoke as everyone’s least favorite most entitled disaster babies is going to be even more accustomed to constant connection and even less likely to separate themselves from their personal devices and eschew updating their social networks than those of us who fall under the Millennial umbrella. 

Since the ability to distract oneself from one’s profound alienation from labor is going to get even easier as wearable technologies and toting around multiple personal electronic devices becomes even more mainstream than it is now, employers are going to have to either accept that their workers are going to be Instagramming their lunch before they file those reports, or they’re going to have to incentivize people away from this kind of behavior. 

[Photo credit: Phil Gradwell, Flickr

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
X (formerly Twitter) returns after global outage
A white X on a black background, which could be Twitter's new logo.

X, formerly known as Twitter, went down for about 90 minutes for users worldwide early on Thursday ET.

Anyone opening the social media app across all platforms was met with a blank timeline. On desktop, users saw a message that simply read, "Welcome to X," while on mobile the app showed suggestions for accounts to follow.

Read more
How to create multiple profiles on a Facebook account
A series of social media app icons on a colorful smartphone screen.

Facebook (and, by extension, Meta) are particular in the way that they allow users to create accounts and interact with their platform. Being the opposite of the typical anonymous service, Facebook sticks to the rule of one account per one person. However, Facebook allows its users to create multiple profiles that are all linked to one main Facebook account.

In much the same way as Japanese philosophy tells us we have three faces — one to show the world, one to show family, and one to show no one but ourselves — these profiles allow us to put a different 'face' out to different aspects or hobbies. One profile can keep tabs on your friends, while another goes hardcore into networking and selling tech on Facebook Marketplace.

Read more
How to set your Facebook Feed to show most recent posts
A smartphone with the Facebook app icon on it all on a white marble background.

Facebook's Feed is designed to recommend content you'd most likely want to see, and it's based on your Facebook activity, your connections, and the level of engagement a given post receives.

But sometimes you just want to see the latest Facebook posts. If that's you, it's important to know that you're not just stuck with Facebook's Feed algorithm. Sorting your Facebook Feed to show the most recent posts is a simple process:

Read more