An increasing number of popular websites will go “black” tomorrow, in protest of the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), the sibling anti-piracy bills currently in Congress. But Twitter will not be one of them.
In response to questions about whether Twitter would join the likes of Reddit and Wikipedia in the January 18 blackout, Twitter co-founder Dick Costolo tweeted that it would be “foolish” and “silly” to shutdown a “global business in response to single-issue national politics.” Many took this to mean that Costolo believed any site that goes black (or, more likely, shows an anti-SOPA/PIPA landing page in place of normal content) over a single bill is “foolish” and “silly.” He later clarified that these adjectives only apply to Twitter going black, not any other organization.
Of course, anti-SOPA/PIPA activists want to have as many companies on board with the blackout as possible. There has been a concerted effort to get Google and Facebook to join in the protest party, but so far, they haven’t taken the bait. (Even though both companies have come out strongly against the legislation.) The more sites, the bigger the message, or so the theory goes.
Thing is, Costolo’s right; it would be foolish, silly, and counterproductive to the anti-SOPA/PIPA movement for Twitter to go offline. When Wikipedia and other sites are down tomorrow, the activists (and, more importantly, news organizations) are going to need a place to go to gauge the effects of the blackout. And no other service is better for taking he pulse of the here-and-now than Twitter.
The activists in this movement, both individuals and companies, need a way to communicate with each other, and with the people who are suddenly met with a splash page on Wikipedia asking them to call their senators. Not all of these people are going to be happy about not being able to get what they want — which is, incidentally, the point of the blackout: to show the possible censorship effects if SOPA or PIPA became law — and not all are going to be sympathetic to the cause, or even grasp what the hell is going on. Luckily, Twitter will be there as resource for explaining the confusion.
Besides its usefulness to the anti-SOPA/PIPA crowd, Twitter is also used by millions of people around the globe, many of whom most certainly do not care about, and are completely unaffected by, US domestic policy. For those users, shutting down Twitter would be an injustice, not to mention highly annoying. It is for this reason that Wikipedia has limited its 24-hour blackout to English-language pages only. Still, oblivious foreigners will be affected, but the negatives are at least being limited.
Even with Twitter there to help smooth the rough edges of tomorrow’s unprecedented online activism, there’s no guaranteeing the effects of the protest will be in the favor of the activists. Public opinion has a way of doing its own thing, especially when it’s guided by untested techniques like shutting down websites.
So, will the Jan. 18 blackout be a success? Who knows. But you can be sure we’ll be checking Twitter all day to find out.
there should be a dislike button….then we could see what an awesome red light saber you have.:D lol
This is ridiculous. Twitter should exactly be the kind of website that goes down, because of all the common people that are going to be affected by it. The internet-savvy people are going to be hit by wikipedia and Reddit going down, but by definition, the internet-savvy people already know about SOPA and PIPA anyway. If Twitter (among other websites) joined in, then you’d be throwing open the floodgates of awareness for the low-to-middle class demographic to find out about SOPA and PIPA, and those are the people that need to reached out to, because they’re the ones that not in the know!
And that would help the cause how? Personally, I use Twitter and Facebook as my communication tools. I WANT to let my friends know about the blackout, but how can I when my tools are down?
If you reach out to your friends using Twitter and Facebook, and hypothetically Twitter and Facebook join the blackout and tell people what they’re blacking out for, then your friends will find out about the blackout … when they try to access Twitter and Facebook!
Umm no. Agree to disagree then. You still need to streets for your protest to get the message out ;)
exactly. i can post on my twitter and facebook all day and night about these bills, but you know what? only 20 out of 300 friends actually know about these bills! most of my friends flood themselves with people they don’t even know and pay more attention to what they have to say half the time. shutting down at least twitter would certainly be forcing people who only care about the kardashians, to become aware of the fact that bills like sopa and pipa are in fact real, and are in fact about to be voted on! everyone who thinks its silly that twitter joins just doesn’t understand the fact that 65% of americans are stupid and don’t even know what’s going on in the world around them outside of their reality tv. when news reports on tv actually cover these bills IN FULL, and show the arguments on both sides IN FULL, that’s when i’ll know the “pulse of the here-and-now”.
This author sucks. It’s good that twitter didn’t join in? Yeah because nobody would survive without twitter for ONE DAY. Idiot.
My argument is not that “nobody would survive without Twitter.” My argument is that having Twitter accessible during the blackout actually helps the cause further its goals.
Terrible terrible article. I cringed the whole way through it.
Why?
Pretty sure the point of this article was that it is a good thing that Twitter remains up as a sounding board during the blackout where people can go to learn about all the sites that are down and the effect the blackout is having. If a tree falls in a forest and nobody tweets about it, does it make a sound?
Well dear author, I won’t detail all of your selfish rationale bit, but you definitely are spinning this and in ignorance too; Not a good thing for a tech writer. In example, It is not a US thing only. Verisign controls at the top level all .COM & .NET registrars, who have wholesalers out to both US & foreign, like enom, namecheap, or joker, all comes back to their control ultimately. They are US, as is obviously ICANN who kept their allegiance under US jurisdiction some years back. SO if US policy goes this way, the world does too. Period. Very poor article, get facts, get backbone, and don’t be such a selfish TWIT as Twitter.
You didn’t read the article clearly. A headline a story does not make….
That isn’t good. The more services that black out the better! especially the ones with a lot of users. Even more so better if it were twitter. ZOMG! WHAT WOULD THE WORLD DO IF THEY DIDN”T KNOW WHAT ASHTON KUTCHER WAS HAVING FOR BREAKFAST?!?!?!?!?!?!
Twitter is worthless, and only provides “news” media cheap commentary. Worthless.
It’s only “worthless” in your eyes. Chances are, the people protesting SOPA and jumping on Twitter tomorrow could not care less about Ashton’s breakfast. How would it be better if Twitter blacked out tomorrow?
The same way it would be better if Google or Facebook blacked out tomorrow. It wakes people up. It makes people who are ignorant of the situation aware of the dangers or possibilities of what could happen. You think a CEO of some fortune 500 corp who wants to be on his twitter or facebook wouldn’t get the point of the black out and the threats to their precious PR tool? you better believe they would. What do you think the chances of millions of people were unable to get to their accounts, instead only to be directed to a place holder with PIPA/SOPA information, where a fraction of them (few hundred thousand) contacted their representatives to complain about the bill? It’s not rocket science.
i’m glad google kinda joined in by censoring their name, but i wish they had done the same to youtube AT LEAST.