Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Instagram is blocking ‘obscene’ hashtags from search and being a hypocrite about it

Add as a preferred source on Google

Bad news for people who like to push boundaries on Instagam (here’s looking at you, Rihanna): the photo-sharing service doesn’t allow you to search for some of its more scandalous hashtags. 

Australian entrepreneur Nick Drewe compiled a list of some of the blocked phrases on Instagram on his blog The Data Pack, and the results are surprising and paint a picture of a rather prude Instagram.

Recommended Videos

Instagram made its fight against “thinspiration” photos public and introduced new rules to stop users from posting content that promoted eating disorders, so it’s no surprise that searching for #thinspiration leaves you with nothing. And it shouldn’t be too shocking that Instagram is blocking tags clearly meant to bring you to pornographic photos, like #dicks.

But some of the blocked terms are bizarre. You can’t search #thesexpistols, for instance. Does Instagram have a secret vendetta against Johnny Rotten? Hard to say, but the criterion for blocking searches seems faulty, since you can’t look up #wefabulousbitch but you can certainly still look up #junkiesofIG. Now, #wefabulousbitch does contain a curse word, but it seems to convey a theme of female empowerment, while #junkiesofIG celebrates hardcore drug culture.  

Some of the stranger blocked phrases include: 

  • #shirtless (Any hashtag that could be used to describe an Abercrombie catalog probably isn’t that salacious.) 
  • #BitchDontKillMyVibes (Pretty sure this would just be Kendrick Lamar-related photos.) 
  • #foodorgasm (Likely refers to delicious brunches… I hope.) 
  • #sofuckingtierd (What?) 
  • #fuckfuel prices (Yes, it says a bad word, but who can argue with the sentiment?!)
  • #notassexylicousasyou (Did someone actually use this tag?) 
  • #SexualWednesdays (Sounds more entertaining than #tbt.) 

In some cases it seems like Instagram is more concerned with banning curse words than hateful or lewd content, probably because it’s easier to simply hide tags with salty language than it is to go through and look for problematic groups of pictures. It’s weird that Instagram lets over 53,000 #thatass photos slide while censoring the likely less popular and less T&A-friendly #jamesmotherfuckingfranco. 

This explains why tons of hashtags featuring the “F” word are banned (including the strangely specific #fucktyler) but explicitly racist and discriminatory stuff still slips past. It makes no sense why #SexualWednesdays is banned but you can still look up #uglyslutsaturday, which is apparently a thing and incredibly horrible. 

Websites that help you search Instagram on the web like Statigram and Webstagram follow Instagram’s lead with the banned terms, so you can’t get around the issue by using a third party. 

And in related “Instagram has strange ideas about what is offensive and inoffensive” news, the photo-sharing site is now the target of anger following its decision to ban one of its members. 

Instagram deleted Amy Woodruff’s account after it was flagged by users who took offense towards a photo of Woodruff breastfeeding while in a yoga handstand. Now, other Instagram users are petitioning the site to let Woodruff back on. 

They’re using the hashtag #savethedaughterofthesun, and there are over a thousand photos in support Woodruff. 

Instagram hasn’t gone full censor, though – you can still search for #savethedaughterofthesun. All in all, it looks like Instagram is being something of a prude. And a hypocritical, arbitrary one at that. 

Kate Knibbs
Former Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more
WhatsApp finally fixes one of its biggest storage headaches with this new cleanup tool
whatsapp-disappearing-messages-after-reading-timer

If your phone's storage keeps mysteriously shrinking, WhatsApp channels might be part of the reason. Photos, videos, voice notes, and other media shared by channels can pile up in the background, and until now, cleaning them out hasn't exactly been a pleasant experience. That's finally changing.

WhatsApp is rolling out a new storage cleanup tool for channel media, giving Android beta users a much simpler way to free up space without digging through endless files one by one. The feature was first spotted in development a couple of months ago, and it's now beginning to reach select beta testers through the latest WhatsApp beta for Android update.

Read more