Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg says children under 13 should be allowed to use Facebook...as a way to improve education, of course.

Speaking at a NewSchools Summit on educational innovation, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted that finding ways to improve children’s education is important to him—and he thinks getting children under age 13 on to Facebook could be a key step in that direction.

Currently, Facebook is barred from allowing children under 13 years of age from using the site by the U.S. Children’s Online Protection Act (COPA), enacted in 1998 as a way to help protect children from Internet predators and cyberbullying. However, many children under 13 lie about their age to set up Facebook accounts—Consumer Reports estimates as many as 7.5 million children under 13 are using Facebook, and a European study estimated 20 percent of European children between 9 and 12 are on Facebook.

Facebook emphasizes that it provides privacy and safety controls to enable users to protect their privacy, and the company has recently acknowledged that it shuts down about 20,000 accounts a day, many for being underage.

However, Zuckerberg noted that Facebook may be willing to work to have the Child Online Protection Act altered or overturned in an effort to bring Facebook’s educational possibilities to younger users. “That will be a fight we take on at some point,” the BBC, Fortune, and others quote Zuckerberg as saying. “My philosophy is that for education you need to start at a really, really young age.”

Critics and privacy advocates note there are several dangers with young children using social networking services, including the risk of online bullying and, perhaps every parents’ worst fear, being targeted by sexual predators. Children often don’t understand the potential consequences of sharing information online, and may inadvertently make themselves and their families vulnerable.

Zuckerberg emphasized that, if the age restriction requirements were to change, his company would take “a lot of precautions” to ensure younger users were safe.

Zuckerberg has inflamed critics in the past declaring privacy is not a “social norm,” and Facebook has long been subject to criticism and litigation surrounding disclosure of personal information.

Showing 34 comments

  1. leeza1007 at 6:07am 25th May 2011 Facebook is an online tragedy live. The intent of this network was to put people together that have lost contact. It has become a breeding ground for the unthinkable and enables people to use it as a tool to cause harm..... bullying, stalking, affairs, suicide, to name a few. There is no law around what facebook has capitalized on, very unfortunate! Keep your eyes open and expect more horrific stories as it grows....
  2. Sinan ERYİĞİT at 11:57am 25th May 2011 I want to show him this: http://www.cloverleaf.com.au/images/2011/04/procrastination-facebook-logo.gif
  3. Sinan ERYİĞİT at 11:57am 25th May 2011 I want to show him this: http://www.cloverleaf.com.au/images/2011/04/procrastination-facebook-logo.gif
  4. Ian Ward at 10:56pm 24th May 2011 Well,of course they should ! What would all the Child Rapists do without them ?
  5. Ian Ward at 10:56pm 24th May 2011 Well,of course they should ! What would all the Child Rapists do without them ?
  6. Orion Rodriguez at 6:50pm 24th May 2011 *presses thumbs down button*
  7. Orion Rodriguez at 6:50pm 24th May 2011 *presses thumbs down button*
  8. Jess Coburn at 5:50pm 24th May 2011 The kids are already all over Facebook using fake birthdates. They're smarter than you think!
  9. Jess Coburn at 5:50pm 24th May 2011 The kids are already all over Facebook using fake birthdates. They're smarter than you think!
  10. Ian Bell at 10:44am 24th May 2011 Obviously just a strategy to keep new user momentum going at Facebook, keep growth up and valuations up. Can't wait to see the legal implications this causes for the company.
  11. Athena the Warrior at 10:41am 24th May 2011 Sooner or later Zuckerberg is really going to screw up. His true intentions and beliefs are being slowly revealed and it's just a matter of time. Work to overturn or alter the Child Online Protection Act so Facebook can bring their educational possibilities to younger users? Does he even consider how this sounds. He wants to strip away online protections that help keep children safe so that his company can make more money? Time to take a closer look at Facebook's business policies.
    1. jourdy288 at 6:25am 25th May 2011 I don't think you realize the implications, Athena. He doesn't want to overturn it entirely. Look carefully. There are a LOT of underage kids on Facebook. They can't be stopped; wouldn't it be better to have them there legitimately with some sort of controls than their illegitimately doing what they want as adults? And in my experience, COPPA sucked hard. I remember when I was under it, it was useless, annoying, etc. Easily circumvented and didn't actually help. So yeah, COPPA needs reform.
  12. Jason Gehrman at 5:21pm 24th May 2011 Kids shouldn't be here at all. This would create a huge amount of problems, especially with their parents. Mr. Zuckerberg has much more important things to focus on, like actually having a customer service department with real people we can speak to when we need help.
  13. Jason Gehrman at 5:21pm 24th May 2011 Kids shouldn't be here at all. This would create a huge amount of problems, especially with their parents. Mr. Zuckerberg has much more important things to focus on, like actually having a customer service department with real people we can speak to when we need help.
  14. Ken McKenzie at 5:15pm 24th May 2011 We need a big "DISLIKE" button.
  15. Ken McKenzie at 5:15pm 24th May 2011 We need a big "DISLIKE" button.
  16. John Wiley at 5:05pm 24th May 2011 It's a huge security risk, espcially if the parents use the computer too for banking and other biz matters..
  17. John Wiley at 5:05pm 24th May 2011 It's a huge security risk, espcially if the parents use the computer too for banking and other biz matters..
  18. Zach Wischler at 4:57pm 24th May 2011 dislike
  19. Zach Wischler at 4:57pm 24th May 2011 dislike
  20. Okay Altinisik at 4:42pm 24th May 2011 I don't know how you all use facebook or what kind of friends you have but my timeline is suitable for 13 years olds.
  21. Orion Rodriguez at 4:40pm 24th May 2011 13 year old kids i could care less all they do is bring random stupid statuses over here it is annoying and they can barley spell
  22. Tamara Johnson Hancock at 4:39pm 24th May 2011 nine or thirteen or sixteen, facebook should not be the ones responsible for the behavior of children online - that is the sole responsibility of the parent to teach, guide and help their child understand the dangers but also the positive elements of being online. Are there people out there who mean ill will toward children or society in general? Sure there are. Teach your kids, help them understand. Be open with them. Also - make sure they know, you have their password, you have access to their account, and you will check it every day to make sure they are following the rules you set. If you don't want your kids under 13 or 15 or 17 to have an account, then that is the decision that is best for you and your family, and good for you for being so proactive about your child's safety. I feel, however, that it is a personal decision within a family. I really dislike laws that are passed that tell me how to raise my family.
  23. Omair Ahmed Khan at 4:36pm 24th May 2011 come on man you already so0o rich... why u provoking under 13 to get exploited to all the easily accessible adult material ....are u not making enuff money ......come on man have a heart .... dont be greedy ..
  24. Tyler Roden at 4:36pm 24th May 2011 LOL, of course he does. Retailers and marketing agencies are increasingly targeting younger and younger demographics. The information that FB would collect from these kids and then presumably share, would translate into $$$$.
  25. Kimberly Howle Walker at 4:36pm 24th May 2011 I agree Chris!!! He wants a FB for 13 and under make a KIDS FB!!!
  26. Christine Vermillion at 4:35pm 24th May 2011 yea i gotta go with Chris here....exactly what is educational about facebook? The only things Im learning are whos gossipping or bitching about who....
  27. Christine Vermillion at 4:35pm 24th May 2011 yea i gotta go with Chris here....exactly what is educational about facebook? The only things Im learning are whos gossipping or bitching about who....
  28. Chris Johnson at 4:28pm 24th May 2011 Um...no matter how he wants to throw the dice, Facebook is not an educational tool. What happens when you have children "liking" adult orientated pages and are subjected to adult topics?If Facebook wants to allow kids under thirteen, they better be damn sure kids are barred from accessing most of Facebook's content. This just seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
  29. Chris Johnson at 4:28pm 24th May 2011 Um...no matter how he wants to throw the dice, Facebook is not an educational tool. What happens when you have children "liking" adult orientated pages and are subjected to adult topics?If Facebook wants to allow kids under thirteen, they better be damn sure kids are barred from accessing most of Facebook's content. This just seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
  30. Lynda Kelly at 4:26pm 24th May 2011 For more about using FB as an educator go here: http://web1.australianmuseum.net.au/BlogPost/Teacher-Talk/How-to-use-facebook
  31. Lynda Kelly at 4:26pm 24th May 2011 For more about using FB as an educator go here: http://web1.australianmuseum.net.au/BlogPost/Teacher-Talk/How-to-use-facebook
  32. Kimberly Howle Walker at 4:25pm 24th May 2011 Zuckerberg,they are way to many creepers out there.I don't think it's wise for kids under 13 to have a FB,,just saying!!!
  33. Kimberly Howle Walker at 4:25pm 24th May 2011 Zuckerberg,they are way to many creepers out there.I don't think it's wise for kids under 13 to have a FB,,just saying!!!
Close Suggestion Report: Twitter acquires TweetDeck for more than $40m
View Article