Anyone following the technology industry doesn’t need to be told that patent litigation is often a long-running, byzantine affair that only gets more confusing the more it’s examined. Case in point: memory developer Rambus has just been awarded supplemental damages in its patent infringement case against Hynix. Although Rambus’s request for injunctive relief was denied by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California—which would have kept Hynix from shipping products using Rambus technologies—Hynix is being forced to execute a mandatory license for nine Rambus patents found to be used in Hynix SDRAM products. Hynix will be required to pay Rambus a one percent royalty on SDR DRAM products and a 4.35 percent royalty on DDR SDRAM products sold in the United States going all the way back to January 1, 2006. These royalties are on top of $133 million in damages already levied against Hynix for patent infringement up through December 31, 2005.
Tag Archive: Hynix
Samsung Files ITC Complaint Against Sharp
Another day, another patent war starts to brew. South Korea’s technology giant Samsung has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission alleging that Japan’s Sharp is selling LCD flat panel displays and other items (like notebook computers, mobile phones, and monitors) that infringe on four Samsung patents. Samsung wants the ITC to bar sales of the Sharp products in the U.S. market.
Hynix Pleads Guilty to DRAM Price Fixing
“In a plea agreement filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, “Hynix acknowledged conspiring with other companies to fix prices of widely used computer memory products between April 1999 and June 2002,” according to the report.
The plea had been expected. As reported in March, Hynix (Seoul) set aside 347 billion won ($338.7 million) in provisions related to the ongoing price-fixing investigation in the DRAM industry, according to a report from the JoongAng Daily in South Korea. ”
Read more at EETimes
Found VIA HardOCP

