<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Solid State Hard Drives Worth the Extra Cash?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/#comment-60228</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60228</guid>
		<description>While I can understand your concern for price in the SSD vs mechanical HDs, I don&#039;t think an Apple product is a very good case for price nor comparison (Macbook Air).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, you know Apple products have never been the &quot;budget&quot; machines. You pay more for an Apple, not to say anything negative by that, but that is the reality of the game. I could find a competing PC (read: Windows) for probably 50-75% the price of a Mac product of the same technical specs. You really think that they aren&#039;t inflating the cost of a SSD upgrade?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now I know that your article was written a good few months ago when SSD was far more expensive and emerging, so I give you that. I&#039;d personally compare more &#039;reasonable&#039; (relatively that is) laptops and netbooks for SSD upgrades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the new ASUS Eee PC 1000 vs the 1000H. The former comes with a 40GB SSD, the latter with a 80GB mechanical. The price difference is a mere hundred or so. That&#039;s reasonable I&#039;d say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I can understand your concern for price in the SSD vs mechanical HDs, I don&#039;t think an Apple product is a very good case for price nor comparison (Macbook Air).</p>
<p>First of all, you know Apple products have never been the &#8220;budget&#8221; machines. You pay more for an Apple, not to say anything negative by that, but that is the reality of the game. I could find a competing PC (read: Windows) for probably 50-75% the price of a Mac product of the same technical specs. You really think that they aren&#039;t inflating the cost of a SSD upgrade?</p>
<p>Now I know that your article was written a good few months ago when SSD was far more expensive and emerging, so I give you that. I&#039;d personally compare more &#039;reasonable&#039; (relatively that is) laptops and netbooks for SSD upgrades.</p>
<p>Look at the new ASUS Eee PC 1000 vs the 1000H. The former comes with a 40GB SSD, the latter with a 80GB mechanical. The price difference is a mere hundred or so. That&#039;s reasonable I&#039;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarxMarvelous37</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/#comment-60232</link>
		<dc:creator>MarxMarvelous37</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60232</guid>
		<description>Makes you wonder why Lenovo requires SSD in their X300... hopefully they will come out with a cheaper version with a standard HDD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes you wonder why Lenovo requires SSD in their X300&#8230; hopefully they will come out with a cheaper version with a standard HDD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/#comment-60231</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60231</guid>
		<description>$1100 for 64GB is ridiculous still, especially since tests (as Josh points out) do not prove SSD to be much faster (if at all) than regular hard drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$1100 for 64GB is ridiculous still, especially since tests (as Josh points out) do not prove SSD to be much faster (if at all) than regular hard drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neutronbeam</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/#comment-60230</link>
		<dc:creator>Neutronbeam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60230</guid>
		<description>OCZ entered the market recently with a 64GB drive, and 64GB SSDs on newegg immediately dropped from about $1800 to $1100.  Crucial and Sandisk are entering the market this year, so prices should come down pretty quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OCZ entered the market recently with a 64GB drive, and 64GB SSDs on newegg immediately dropped from about $1800 to $1100.  Crucial and Sandisk are entering the market this year, so prices should come down pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/are-solid-state-hard-drives-worth-the-extra-cash/#comment-60229</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60229</guid>
		<description>Solid state drives are currently nothing more than a marketing scheme. They have minimal gains, do not improve battery life and are a rip-off. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid state drives are currently nothing more than a marketing scheme. They have minimal gains, do not improve battery life and are a rip-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
