<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wal-Mart Names HD DVD the Winner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:02:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59751</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59751</guid>
		<description>Sorry Rob, have to disagree with you here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The latest report shows Blu-Ray outselling HD DVD by a lot:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.digitaltrends.com/article12787.html&quot; title=&quot;http://news.digitaltrends.com/article12787.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.digitaltrends.com/article12787.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;According to the figures, consumers purchased nearly 1.2 million high-definition discs in the first quarter of 2007; of those, 832,530 were Blu-ray titles and 359,300 were HD DVD discs. Home Media Magazine says Blu-ray took the sales lead on February and that, by March, the format accounted for nearly three out of every four high-definition discs sold, racking up 335,980 disc sales compared to HD DVDs 119,570 discs. &quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3 out of 4 HD discs were Blu-Ray man. Plus with Disney showing support for only Blu-Ray, the gap is going to widen even more. And like the article I linked to points out, once Prates of the Caribbean comes out, it will all be over. Other than the price point of their player, HD DVD has nothing going for it. It&#039;s about the content here...not the price IMO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Rob, have to disagree with you here.</p>
<p>The latest report shows Blu-Ray outselling HD DVD by a lot:</p>
<p> <a href="http://news.digitaltrends.com/article12787.html" title="http://news.digitaltrends.com/article12787.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.digitaltrends.com/article12787.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;According to the figures, consumers purchased nearly 1.2 million high-definition discs in the first quarter of 2007; of those, 832,530 were Blu-ray titles and 359,300 were HD DVD discs. Home Media Magazine says Blu-ray took the sales lead on February and that, by March, the format accounted for nearly three out of every four high-definition discs sold, racking up 335,980 disc sales compared to HD DVDs 119,570 discs. &#8220;</p>
<p>3 out of 4 HD discs were Blu-Ray man. Plus with Disney showing support for only Blu-Ray, the gap is going to widen even more. And like the article I linked to points out, once Prates of the Caribbean comes out, it will all be over. Other than the price point of their player, HD DVD has nothing going for it. It&#039;s about the content here&#8230;not the price IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59753</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59753</guid>
		<description>This is a biased article.  I am neither a blu ray or HD DVD fan. But according to this:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557&quot; title=&quot;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wal mart will still be carrying Sony&#039;s new blu ray system as well as the PS3, I would hardly say they declared a winner.  They will use both formats to bring in traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a biased article.  I am neither a blu ray or HD DVD fan. But according to this:<br />
 <a href="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557" title="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10.." rel="nofollow">http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n&#8230;rticle_ID=10..</a>.</p>
<p>Wal mart will still be carrying Sony&#039;s new blu ray system as well as the PS3, I would hardly say they declared a winner.  They will use both formats to bring in traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59754</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59754</guid>
		<description>According to this:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557&quot; title=&quot;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wal mart WILL be selling blu ray players too.  And that information is coming from a Wal mart exec.  War ain&#039;t over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this:<br />
 <a href="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557" title="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10557" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n...rticle_ID=10.." rel="nofollow">http://www.homemediaretailing.com/n&#8230;rticle_ID=10..</a>.</p>
<p>Wal mart WILL be selling blu ray players too.  And that information is coming from a Wal mart exec.  War ain&#039;t over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AV_Integrated</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59757</link>
		<dc:creator>AV_Integrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59757</guid>
		<description>This is a lousy piece of &#039;journalism&#039; that has been based entirely on Internet rumor with no substantial facts or basis in reality.  Wal-Mart has given no official statement of policy and absolutely zero solid information on whether the hardware they are developing is Blu-ray, HD DVD, or perhaps even both.  The Blu-ray Disc Association has been dealing with Chinese hardware developers for years, including Lite-On which has already shown Blu-ray prototype drives:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jpg&quot; title=&quot;http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A serious website should not allow for a person to post a commentary that reads like a &#039;news&#039; article without it starting off with a clear cut &quot;THIS IS RUMORED&quot; as the headline.  Because, at most, that is all it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this article was written as a commentary then it should read &quot;Wal-Mart could decide the fate of HD discs by choosing a specific format.&quot;  or something similar, then go into details of how Wal-Mart&#039;s upcoming actions could possibly sway the format war one way or the other.  It sure doesn&#039;t read like that - it reads like the decision has been made and that there have been specific official announcements by Wal-Mart that back up those claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead - we get rumors, presented as facts, and a website that allows such rubish to presented in a way that is a far cry from &#039;commentary&#039;.  Thanks, but I won&#039;t be returning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a lousy piece of &#039;journalism&#039; that has been based entirely on Internet rumor with no substantial facts or basis in reality.  Wal-Mart has given no official statement of policy and absolutely zero solid information on whether the hardware they are developing is Blu-ray, HD DVD, or perhaps even both.  The Blu-ray Disc Association has been dealing with Chinese hardware developers for years, including Lite-On which has already shown Blu-ray prototype drives:   <a href="http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jpg" title="http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jp.." rel="nofollow">http://www.blu-ray.com/images/ifa2006/liteon_03.jp..</a>.</p>
<p>A serious website should not allow for a person to post a commentary that reads like a &#039;news&#039; article without it starting off with a clear cut &#8220;THIS IS RUMORED&#8221; as the headline.  Because, at most, that is all it is.</p>
<p>If this article was written as a commentary then it should read &#8220;Wal-Mart could decide the fate of HD discs by choosing a specific format.&#8221;  or something similar, then go into details of how Wal-Mart&#039;s upcoming actions could possibly sway the format war one way or the other.  It sure doesn&#039;t read like that &#8211; it reads like the decision has been made and that there have been specific official announcements by Wal-Mart that back up those claims.</p>
<p>Instead &#8211; we get rumors, presented as facts, and a website that allows such rubish to presented in a way that is a far cry from &#039;commentary&#039;.  Thanks, but I won&#039;t be returning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AV_Integrated</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59760</link>
		<dc:creator>AV_Integrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59760</guid>
		<description>Oh - and here is a serious journalist who went to Wal-Mart for actual commentary and received actual confirmation that Wal-Mart not only IS supporting Blu-ray, but has plans to continue to do so moving forward...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaking_article.cfm?article_id=10557&quot; title=&quot;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaking_article.cfm?article_id=10557&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaki...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure where this leaves your claim that Wal-Mart is making &#039;plans to go exclusive&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh &#8211; and here is a serious journalist who went to Wal-Mart for actual commentary and received actual confirmation that Wal-Mart not only IS supporting Blu-ray, but has plans to continue to do so moving forward&#8230;</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaking_article.cfm?article_id=10557" title="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaking_article.cfm?article_id=10557" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaki.." rel="nofollow">http://www.homemediaretailing.com/news/html/breaki..</a>.</p>
<p>Not sure where this leaves your claim that Wal-Mart is making &#039;plans to go exclusive&#039;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59764</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59764</guid>
		<description>Here is a good article discussing the manufacturing costs of HD DVD compared to Blu-Ray:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replication-costs-revealed/111/&quot; title=&quot;http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replication-costs-revealed/111/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replicatio...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like they are pretty close in costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To AV integrated: This is an opinion piece, and has been written accordingly. I don&#039;t appreciate the rude comments by you and think it would be best if you did not visit anymore. We are also going to strip the website URL from your name, since you obviously care about sending traffic to your site rather than discussing the piece, and presenting your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a good article discussing the manufacturing costs of HD DVD compared to Blu-Ray:  <a href="http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replication-costs-revealed/111/" title="http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replication-costs-revealed/111/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replicatio.." rel="nofollow">http://wesleytech.com/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-replicatio..</a>.</p>
<p>Looks like they are pretty close in costs.</p>
<p>To AV integrated: This is an opinion piece, and has been written accordingly. I don&#039;t appreciate the rude comments by you and think it would be best if you did not visit anymore. We are also going to strip the website URL from your name, since you obviously care about sending traffic to your site rather than discussing the piece, and presenting your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59767</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59767</guid>
		<description>Looks like this article and debate made it to Digg:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD_the_Winner&quot; title=&quot;http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD_the_Winner&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digg it guys! The fight is on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like this article and debate made it to Digg:  <a href="http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD_the_Winner" title="http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD_the_Winner" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD.." rel="nofollow">http://www.digg.com/hardware/Wal_Mart_Names_HD_DVD..</a>.</p>
<p>Digg it guys! The fight is on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59843</link>
		<dc:creator>RC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59843</guid>
		<description>Rob was right (for once) by saying that Wal-Mart would name the winner, but sadly for him it was Blu-ray, not HD-DVD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And whatever happened to these mysterious low cost HD-DVD players from China anyway?  They never showed up at Wal-Mart or anywhere else that I ever saw, that&#039;s for sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh well, I give you credit for the nice prediction, it only took 10 months for it to be proven utterly false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob was right (for once) by saying that Wal-Mart would name the winner, but sadly for him it was Blu-ray, not HD-DVD.</p>
<p>And whatever happened to these mysterious low cost HD-DVD players from China anyway?  They never showed up at Wal-Mart or anywhere else that I ever saw, that&#039;s for sure.</p>
<p>Oh well, I give you credit for the nice prediction, it only took 10 months for it to be proven utterly false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWalla</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59842</link>
		<dc:creator>DWalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59842</guid>
		<description>Once again Rob Enderle&#039;s forecasts are proven false. I really should start keeping score on this putz. He&#039;s definitely wrong more often than he&#039;s correct. But then again, whoever thought a consultant knows anything besides how to pry money out of your wallet. I&#039;ll bet he&#039;s really charismatic in real life and uses a lot of buzz words.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HD-DVD is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again Rob Enderle&#039;s forecasts are proven false. I really should start keeping score on this putz. He&#039;s definitely wrong more often than he&#039;s correct. But then again, whoever thought a consultant knows anything besides how to pry money out of your wallet. I&#039;ll bet he&#039;s really charismatic in real life and uses a lot of buzz words.</p>
<p>HD-DVD is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/talk-backs/wal-mart-names-hd-dvd-the-winner/#comment-59841</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59841</guid>
		<description>Ah, well - wrong again!! Blu-Ray is by far the superior format out of the two and this has been show the the movie industry support and now the retail industry - Woolworths and Walmart blu-ray backers!!!&lt;br /&gt;
How Blu are you feeling after this latest announcement?! I&#039;m not cos I knew that SONY wouldn&#039;t be burned again as with betamax.&lt;br /&gt;
With my PS3 as one of the best, and only upgradeable player I am on a winner - you clearly wont be!! Woo Hoo - GO BLU!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, well &#8211; wrong again!! Blu-Ray is by far the superior format out of the two and this has been show the the movie industry support and now the retail industry &#8211; Woolworths and Walmart blu-ray backers!!!<br />
How Blu are you feeling after this latest announcement?! I&#039;m not cos I knew that SONY wouldn&#039;t be burned again as with betamax.<br />
With my PS3 as one of the best, and only upgradeable player I am on a winner &#8211; you clearly wont be!! Woo Hoo &#8211; GO BLU!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
