megaupload-seized

Anyone who used Megaupload to store files long-term should have read the site's Terms of Service, the Department of Justice tells Digital Trends.

If you had personal files stored long-term on the now-dead Megaupload, consider them gone for good. A Department of Justice spokesperson, who asked not to be named “for security reasons,” tells us in an email that the Website “clearly warned users not to keep a sole copy of material on the site,” so there was no reason to believe these files would remain safe and accessible.

“This is still an ongoing matter, however as alleged in the indictment, the vast majority of Megaupload.com users do not have significant capabilities to store private content long-term since anything that isn’t repeatedly downloaded is automatically deleted from the system,” said the spokesperson in an email to Digital Trends. “To the extent there are users that do have copies stored on Megaupload.com, it is important to note that Mega clearly warned users not to keep a sole copy of material on the site.

“In fact,  Megaupload.com expressly informed users through its Frequently Asked Questions (‘FAQs’) and its Terms of Service that users have no proprietary interest in any of the files on Megaupload’s servers, they assume the full risk of complete loss or unavailability of their data, and that Megaupload can terminate site operations without prior notice.”

In other words: Don’t blame the US government for taking your files. User who utilized Megaupload’s cloud storage services — which, incidentally, only constituted a fraction of its visitors — should have had no reasonable belief that their files were safely stored on the website’s servers, even if the FBI hadn’t shutdown the site, seized its servers, and locked up its executives.

Like a dwindling number of other websites, Megaupload was what is known as a “cyberlocker.” It allowed users to upload large files. A link to the file was automatically generated for easy sharing. Users could then download the file via the corresponding link. Files that were not regularly downloaded were automatically deleted after a certain period of non-use, though Premium members could store files for a longer period of time, among other perks.

The difference between Megaupload and other cloud-based services, says the DoJ spokesperson, is that the site allegedly built its entire business model on distributing copyrighted content illegally.

“The indictment alleges that the Mega conspirators designed their business model on profiting from distributing content, not storing it,” said the spokesperson. “As one of the conspirators allegedly said in an email, ‘We’re not pirates, we’re just providing shipping services to pirates.’ (See paragraph kk on page 36 of the indictment.) Mega was targeted because the investigation revealed that its ownership allegedly had knowledge of the infringing content, took steps to conceal that content, and rewarded those who uploaded infringing content, among other things.”

For those of you who are interested, you can read the full 72-page indictment here: pdf.

Showing 11 comments

  1. theFreak at 9:52am 24th January 2012 How many Terrabyte of data lost forever?
  2. dansus at 7:17pm 23rd January 2012 Well they havent proven their case yet, and if they cant, they will have to restore everything.
  3. ZungHoo Desmois at 6:47pm 23rd January 2012 Dude, this makes a whole lot of sense. WOw.
  4. Dave Allen at 6:22pm 23rd January 2012 It amazes me how people are all in an uproar because they have to actually buy music and other media.
    1. Pendrake at 12:32pm 23rd January 2012 Shutting down MegaUpload for piracy is like bombing New York City because there is illegal drug use there.Seriously, MU was used by indy developers as a cheap way to distribute their software. There are many Linux distributions that use MU as a download mirror. Heck XDA Developers, a site dedicated to Android custom ROMs (Legal, Android is open source), has over 200,000 broken links due to the feds going after MU.MU isn't a piracy site, it is a file hosting site. They had anti-piracy features built in, such as not being able to search MU for files. If you wanted to distribute a file on MU, you uploaded your file, then posted a link. It was up to the USER to get the word out on their files. MU also had a "Top 100" downloads section that they did monitor to make sure nothing copyrighted was there with out the owner's permission.
  5. dslovejoy at 2:19pm 23rd January 2012 Big Brother has arrived. Expect more government interference as they write themselves more power.
  6. icetrout at 12:26pm 23rd January 2012 Pot calling the kettle black,DOJ's bossman need's to be jailed for supplying guns to his mexican drug partners!!! "Fast & Furious" DOJ should have know better.Now how bout DOJ doing it's job @ the polls & keep the illegals from voting. & while their @ it enforce the god damn immigration laws. &...
  7. jesterking at 12:04pm 23rd January 2012 Amazing... and ICE did all this without SOPA. Go figure.
  8. Zackery Brown at 6:12pm 23rd January 2012 So, I haven't really heard about megaupload till the banning of it. What was it? Like Piratebay? Some pretty crazy stuff over this site. Thanks for the stuff on it DT.
    1. jesterking at 12:04pm 23rd January 2012 It was a place where you uploaded your file and you could access it somewhere else. It was a nice way to get around the 10 mb limit that most email services have. I know people who used to upload home videos of their kids to share with friends and family. About 1-2 gigs at a time. It was pretty convenient. Still, there are other services out there like this. Yousendit is one that I've used in the past.
  9. CharlesN at 9:34am 23rd January 2012 Really? So the millions of businesses and private users who paid this company for the service are just more "collateral damage" to this administration then.Any lawyers out there looking to make a name for themselves? This could be the big one. Not only did the DoJ unilaterally and preemptively raid and seize servers containing all of YOUR documents and business materials, they are even now looking through them all, getting all kinds of information that users in the US and countries around the world rightly think they have no business digging through. That sounds like a HUGE unconstitutional invasion of privacy and illegal search and seizure for those of us who are citizens here in the US, not sure about the international implications. The DoJ then issues what amounts to a gigantic "screw you" as a response to users legitimately concerned about their sometimes irreplaceable files.To anyone who thinks this is all OK because of some infringing files, here's a little perspective: At last estimate, there were over 8 billion unique files hosted on Megaupload's servers. If every single book, magazine, music track, movie, and TV show ever made were present on those servers, that is less than 2% of the total file count. That means that some 7.8 billion non-infringing files were destroyed without any notice, warning, or chance to recover your legal files. And then the DoJ has the sheer GALL to say "Well, you should have known better"?!Wow. Just... wow. I smell an international lawsuit of staggering proportions in the wings on this one. The damage done here is worse than all the cyberattacks and IP infringement in the last 20 years.
Close Suggestion White House joins Google+ to further engage with voters
View Article