Skip to main content

Google will soon censor a lot more ‘damaging’ search results in Europe

made for google
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Want to be forgotten? You got it. On March 4, Google confirmed reports that it would acquiesce to European demands regarding the extent of its “right-to-be-forgotten” legislation. Now, the same rules will be applied even to search engines outside of Europe. It’s the latest development in a nearly two-year-old debate regarding the longevity of Internet-based information.

Back in 2014, the European Union ruled that Google must accept valid requests from people to hide pages that featured information deemed outdated, irrelevant, or “damaging” to them. In essence, it had to censor its search results, but only for European websites. Now, those rules are being expanded to affect all websites, and even other search engines.

Previously, only the EU versions of Google results had to delist search results (those that ended in .de, .fr, or .co.uk). Now, all websites are included in the mandate.

The decision comes as something as a surprise, as Google previously fought the sweeping request, saying last year that the over-application of the legislation was “a troubling development that risks serious chilling effects on the Web.” But threats of fines and sanctions appear to have worked their magic on the Silicon Valley firm, and now, the EU has emerged victorious.

In a blog post explaining the new protocol, Peter Fleischer, global privacy counsel at Google noted, “We’re changing our approach as a result of specific discussions that we’ve had with EU data protection regulators in recent months. We believe that this additional layer of delisting enables us to provide the enhanced protections that European regulators ask us for, while also upholding the rights of people in other countries to access lawfully published information.”

“Starting next week,” the post continues, “in addition to our existing practice, we will also use geolocation signals (like IP addresses) to restrict access to the delisted URL on all Google Search domains, including google.com, when accessed from the country of the person requesting the removal. We’ll apply the change retrospectively, to all delistings that we have already done under the European Court ruling.”

So what does that mean in practice? Essentially, if a URL is delisted in the U.K., users in that country would not be able to see that particular result no matter what Google Search domain they use (including Google.com). However, users outside of the U.K. would be able to see the results in any search on a non-European Google Search domain.

While Google doesn’t seem altogether in love with the new practice, Fleischer notes, “Since May 2014, we’ve worked hard to find the right balance as we implement the European Court’s ruling. Despite occasional disagreements, we’ve maintained a collaborative dialogue with data protection authorities throughout. We’re committed to continuing to work in this way.”

Editors' Recommendations

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Will Google ever lose its throne as king of search? Here are its main contenders
Person using Google on a laptop.

“Advertising income often provides an incentive to provide poor quality search results,” Google’s founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, argued in a research paper when they were still working out of their Stanford dorm rooms.

Today, Google is synonymous with the web -- but it’s also far from the sort of “competitive and transparent” search engine Brin and Page set out to develop decades ago. Google’s journey into the dictionary and becoming a trillion-dollar empire demanded a slate of fatal modifications to its original blueprint. The result is a search engine that buries organic links under an avalanche of ads, keeps tabs on its visitors’ every move and click, and manipulates results by tapping into the giant pool of data Google harvests from the rest of its services.

Read more
Google to ax its Shopping app in favor of web search
Google Logo

In its latest effort to streamline its myriad of offerings, Google has decided to send its Shopping app to the scrapyard.

Google is no stranger to axing apps and services when it feels that something no longer serves its purpose, and Shopping for Android and iOS is the latest casualty, the company has confirmed.

Read more
Google’s completed Fitbit acquisition may help Wear OS more than Fitbit
fitbit versa 3 deal amazon black friday 2020 2 fi 768x768

Google’s $2.1 billion acquisition of Fitbit has been completed, following a lengthy regulatory process that began soon after the announcement of the deal took place in November 2019. Concerns over privacy and antitrust forced Google to agree to various rules in order to pass the deal in the European Union, and in the announcement of the deal’s closure, both Google and Fitbit have said it’s about devices, and not data.

Fitbit has become the brand most associate with fitness tracking, illustrated by how it has sold 120 million devices all over the world since the company’s inception in 2007. It has created a user-friendly, data-rich fitness platform, matched to simple hardware that appeals to many. Fitbit is the fifth largest wearable tech company in the world by shipments, according to IDC, behind Apple, Xiaomi, Huawei, and Samsung.

Read more