Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Apple
  4. Mobile
  5. Web
  6. News

Apple CEO Tim Cook reportedly lashes out at the Obama administration on encryption, privacy

Add as a preferred source on Google

For the past four years, President Barack Obama has mentioned the word “cyber” in his State of the Union addresses. And while he touched on technology-related issues, this year’s speech broke that streak.

The omission adds credence to what surprisingly few tech CEOs have been saying about the White House’s lack of leadership regarding its position on unbreakable encryption. Apple CEO Tim Cook has always maintained that end-to-end encryption and privacy will always be a priority for his company — and recently he lashed out at the administration, asking them to issue a strong public statement defending a “no backdoors” policy.

Recommended Videos

At a meeting discussing counterterrorism issues with tech leaders and officials in the Obama administration last week, sources briefed on the meeting told The Intercept that Cook reportedly said the administration should defend the use of unbreakable encryption, and that tech companies should not be required to build a special access portal in devices and operating systems for law enforcement to access user data.

According to The Intercept’s source, whom we are unable to verify, Attorney General Loretta Lynch responded by discussing the necessary “balance” the government has to maintain between privacy and national security.

Representatives from Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, and other industry leaders were present at the meeting.

End-to-end encryption does not offer a way for the government to snoop on conversations, and it’s a feature companies like Apple are using in services like iMessage. Encrypted devices also pose a problem for law enforcement that want to tap into a device, as it requires the user’s control to unlock.

FBI Director James Comey has long been asking tech giants to provide front door access to encryption technology so the bureau can access messages, files, and other information. And while The Washington Post reported that the White House decided “not to pursue legislation against unbreakable encryption” last fall, a top lawyer in the intelligence community, Robert Litt, was quoted as saying the administration has value in keeping its options open.

Cook’s response is hardly his first regarding privacy and encryption. In a recent interview with The Telegraph, Cook said to protect anyone that uses products, encryption is a must, and that forcing the inclusion of a loophole could have “dire consequences.”

Julian Chokkattu
Former Mobile and Wearables Editor
Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…
Apple’s Siri AI is free, until you actually start using it
Turns out "unlimited" AI might come with an asterisk and an iCloud+ upgrade prompt.
Siri Ai on iPhone

Apple's latest earnings call had plenty of good news: record iPhone revenue, a record June quarter, and non-stop excitement about Siri AI. But buried inside the analyst Q&A was a detail that caught my attention: Apple all but confirmed that heavy Siri AI users could eventually need a bigger iCloud+ plan to keep using it comfortably.

Will heavy Siri AI users need to pay more?

Read more
Viaim RecDot Review: These AI earbuds sounds great and also take notes for you
These earbuds do the one thing they set out to do, and they do it extremely well.
Viaiam RecDot in-ear

Button Text

Quick Take

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan looks cheap until you remember who owns the device
Apple Upgrade could be perfect for serial upgraders. But most people aren't one
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple has found a great way to make an expensive iPhone more approachable. Apple Upgrade lets customers lease eligible devices through Klarna, with iPhone terms lasting 12 or 24 months. At the end, you can return the device, begin another lease, or pay the remaining amount to own it.

My initial reaction focused heavily on the value customers lose by returning an iPhone they could have sold or traded. While that concern is still valid, the program makes considerably more sense for a select group of people who already replace their iPhones every year. But the question is... how many people actually do that?

Read more