Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook, Twitter cut off surveillance tool used by police to monitor protesters

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram are cutting ties with a social media surveillance company after a report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claimed it was being used by the police to target protesters.

Digital Trends reported in April that Geofeedia — a social media mapping tool that analyzes geotagged messages on the aforementioned platforms — was receiving funds through the CIA’s venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel, in light of a report by The Intercept.

Recommended Videos

Now, the ACLU claims it has uncovered documents in which Geofeedia touts the “special access” it has to user data thanks to its “arrangements” with the leading social networks. This despite the fact that all three social media companies have policies in place that prohibit developers from selling user data for the purposes of surveillance.

As a result of Geofeedia’s marketing efforts, law enforcement in Oakland and Baltimore have used its tool to monitor protests, and target activist groups considered “overt threats,” according to the ACLU.

In the case of Facebook — and its photo-sharing platform, Instagram — Geofeedia was allowed to access public posts that included location-based user data in the case of the latter. Facebook also agreed to let it obtain a ranked feed relating to specific posts (broken down by hashtags, events, or specific places). Both Facebook and Instagram terminated this access on September 19.

Twitter had also allegedly been providing Geeofedia searchable access to its database of public tweets as recently as July. On Tuesday, the official Twitter Policy account tweeted that it is “immediately suspending Geofeedia’s commercial access to Twitter data” as a result of ACLU’s findings.

Based on information in the @ACLU’s report, we are immediately suspending @Geofeedia’s commercial access to Twitter data.

— Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) October 11, 2016

“[Geofeedia] only had access to data that people chose to make public,” a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement. “Its access was subject to the limitations in our Platform Policy, which outlines what we expect from developers that receive data using the Facebook Platform.”

“If a developer uses our APIs in a way that has not been authorized … we will take swift action to stop them and we will end our relationship altogether if necessary,” the spokesperson added.

“Social media companies and their executives have expressed support for activists, movements, and free speech. Mark Zuckerberg endorsed Black Lives Matter and Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey went to Ferguson,” writes the ACLU in its blog post. “Yet there is a severe disconnect between these positions and the data access they have provided.”

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Meta’s new AI can generate images of you from your Instagram, and you’re opted in 
Meta's approach to Instagram likeness rights with Muse Image raises questions that a watermark alone doesn't answer.
Instagram Muse Image

Meta launched Muse Image on July 7, 2026, and while it’s an exciting development, buried inside all the announcements is something that deserves a closer look. 

If your Instagram account is public, strangers can use your photos to generate AI images of you via Muse Image. More importantly, it's switched on by default.

Read more
Meta’s new image and video AI tools let you turn Instagram into your creative mood board
Two models, one launch, and an Instagram trick nobody else has.
Art, Collage, Face

Meta has been cooking something up, and today, it finally put it on the table. On July 7, 2026, Meta Superintelligence Labs launched Muse Image and Muse Video (in preview), its first in-house media generation models. 

The rollout comes with a few features that are genuinely hard to argue with.

Read more
Social media ban for young users is proving to be an age verification nightmare
A fake birthday is enough to beat Australia's social media ban on teens.
Social media apps on smartphone

Australia’s world-first teen social media ban was supposed to keep children under 16 away from popular platforms, including Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and X. While this was a major controversial change, it appears that getting around it was barely even a challenge.

Researchers created 50 test accounts across nine of the ten platforms covered by the law. Each account claimed its user was 16, the minimum permitted age. None of the platforms asked the researchers to provide proof or complete another age-assurance check. Only the Australian livestreaming platform Kick refused to create an account without a proper age verification.

Read more