Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Wearables
  3. Mobile
  4. Features

Why I stopped wearing my smartwatch — and why I haven’t looked back

Add as a preferred source on Google

I fell in love with smartwatches when I got my hands on the first-generation Moto 360, a beautifully designed, gorgeous smartwatch running Google’s first OS for smartwatches. Since then, I’ve tried on and reviewed more than a dozen fitness wearables, including the Apple Watch SE and Amazfit GTR and GTS series. And with time, I’ve grown to absolutely dislike the product segment.

I gave up on smartwatches a few months ago, and here’s why I’m not going back any time soon (unless it’s for review purposes).

Recommended Videos

Data, data, and more data

Apple Watch Series 8 showing its App Library.
Joe Maring / Digital Trends

I used to wear my smartwatch to sleep. And my daily routine after waking up was to check how many hours of deep sleep I got. The habit sucked me first into the smartwatch and then into the app. I’d barely be awake, and instantly I’d be bombarded with data – light sleep, deep sleep, REM, and whatnot.

And once that was done, I became accustomed to checking out more fitness data — like the number of steps I walked the day before and how many calories I took in. In the first 20 minutes of the day, I was already sucked into a screen.

Body composition on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5.
Joe Maring / Digital Trends

As if that’s not enough, every time I lifted my wrist to look at the time, I was again face-to-face with information overload. Lift your wrist to check the time? Here’s how many miles you’ve walked today. Ended the day without walking much? Oh, here is a feel-bad notification about how you missed your goal. Working on closing those activity rings? Here’s a badge for you.

Wearing a smartwatch is a vomit of data in your face. And most of the time, you don’t know what to do with that data.

Smartwatches might be helping some people stay fit or get in shape, but no amount of closing my rings or sharing fitness data with friends motivates me to exercise more. In fact, I became more irritated every time I saw one of my friends close their rings while I was sitting there gulping a big bite of pizza.

I don’t want to be always available to a gadget

An Apple Watch Series 8 with the display turned on.
Joe Maring / Digital Trends

Smartwatches were developed to be available to you when you need them and not vice versa. I noticed that the opposite was happening to me.

In a meeting and get a notification? Here, let me swipe right to dismiss it. Out with friends and get a ping on your wrist? It’s your boss, and he wants that assignment done tomorrow. Having dinner with family and get a spam call? Easy. Tap the red icon to end it.

There are two patterns here. Number one, not every notification is time-sensitive. In fact, I’ll go on to say that most of the notifications that you receive on your smartwatch aren’t time-sensitive. Notifications can wait. You mostly look at them on your wrist and swipe them away. Number two, these notifications are getting in the way of living your life in the present moment.

Notifications on the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

When I’m having dinner with my mom and dad, I don’t want my wrist to buzz. Let me have my meal in peace. Let me hang out with my friends without the need to constantly be connected to the virtual world after working hours. Let me be attentive in the meeting without being taken away from the conversation every few minutes.

It might sound cliche, but I’d very much like people to be present in what they’re doing in the moment — without being distracted by a little gadget buzzing on their wrist. For me, one out of 10 notifications might be time-sensitive and need my attention. In a bid to not miss that one notification, I was subjecting myself to nine useless notifications that distracted me from what I was doing in real life.

You can always wear a smartwatch and turn off the notifications. But did you really buy a smartwatch to do that? A fitness band would have sufficed.

Living a stress-free life

Casio G Shock GA-B2100 in blue.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

With such inconveniences, it was natural for me to get frustrated and give up on the form factor. I switched to the good old G-Shocks and Tissots of the world. I no longer have to wait a split second when I raise my wrist to see the time. When I want to check the date, I’m only looking at the information I need, and not the data the watch wants to feed me.

Now, my watch works for me — and that’s how it’s supposed to be. In the data-hungry world where we want to track every calorie intake and every step we take, sometimes it’s wise to take a step back and look at your choices. Are you always available for your smartwatch, or is it always available for you? If it’s the former, you know it’s time to give yourself a break from all the metrics and take out your dumb watch — just as I did.

There is something liberating about not being a slave to the data. I’m no longer in a rush to close the rings. I don’t need to track every calorie I take in. I don’t care about the amount of deep sleep I’m getting. But at the same time, I’m living a healthier life because the stress of data on my wrist is no longer competing to take up space in my mind. I’m living a happier life, and I have the lack of a smartwatch on my wrist to thank.

Prakhar Khanna
Prakhar Khanna is an independent consumer tech journalist. He contributes to Digital Trends' Mobile section with features and…
Apple’s smart glasses are running late because they don’t want to stir a privacy storm
Apple is taking extra time to make sure its smart glasses do not inherit Meta’s creepy reputation
Meta Glasses

Apple could unveil its first smart glasses at WWDC in June 2027, followed by a consumer release toward the end of the year, according to Bloomberg. The device, internally codenamed N50, had reportedly been scheduled for an introduction in late 2026 and a launch in early 2027.

Part of the delay reportedly stems from Apple’s engineering and marketing teams spending more time refining the product and deciding how to address the privacy concerns that come with putting cameras on someone’s face. Privacy is said to be the top priority for the teams working on the glasses.

Read more
Shopping for back-to-school? These are the smartwatches I’d actually wear to class
From a $69 wrist companion to the newest Apple Watch, these are the smartwatches worth strapping on this semester.
Different smartwatch models with displays illuminated.

Between early classes, evening workouts, late study sessions, and everything in between, a smartwatch can do a lot of the mental math a student doesn't have time for. Whether it's tracking sleep, reminding you to move, or keeping notifications off your phone during lectures, a good smartwatch can be both a silent organizer and a health tracker for students. 

If you’re in the market for a new smartwatch this back-to-school season, I’ve got seven recommendations for you, each with a few unique aspects. From a $69 budget pick to the newest Apple Watch, every one of them earns its keep, so the only real decision left is which features matter most to you.

Read more
Qualcomm is set to ratchet up chip prices in September, and your next gadget upgrade could bear the brunt
The price hike could touch every Snapdragon-powered device category.
The new Qualcomm Snadragon 8 Elite Gen 5

I want you to sit with this for a second. Qualcomm, the company whose Snapdragon chips sit inside your Android phone and tablet, your Windows laptop, your Meta smart glasses, your Galaxy Watch, and your wireless earbuds, reportedly sent a letter to every major customer telling them prices are going up by double digits. 

The price hike will be in effect from September 1, 2026, a recent Bloomberg report claims. Essentially, all the companies placing their chip orders after that will pay a higher price. 

Read more