Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Versus

This Asus laptop handily beats the XPS 13 — and it’s cheaper

Add as a preferred source on Google
The Zenbook S 14 on a table in front of a grass lawn.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends
The Asus Zenbook S 14 in front of a grass lawn.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends

Windows manufacturers have been hungering for a chipset that can keep up with Apple’s very fast and efficient M3 architecture. Enter Qualcomm with its Snapdragon X and Intel with iLunar Lake. Each aims at providing better battery life with good performance, as well as adding faster on-device AI speeds to support Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC initiative.

The XPS 13 9345 is among the first Qualcomm laptops and the Zenbook S 14 is the first Lunar Lake laptop that we’ve reviewed. This makes it an important battle to see which platform can make it to our list of the best laptops.

Recommended Videos

Specs and configurations

   Asus Zenbook S 14 (UX5406SA) Dell XPS 13 9345 (Qualcomm)
Dimensions 12.22 x 8.45 x 0.47-0.51 inches 11.62 inches x 7.84 inches x 0.60 inches
Weight 2.65 pounds 2.6 pounds
CPU Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
CPU Intel Arc 140V Adreno
RAM 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
32GB LPDDR5X RAM
16GB
32GB
64GB
Display 14.0-inch 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED, 120Hz 13.4-inch FHD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS non-touch, 120Hz
13.4-inch QHD+ (2560 x 1600) IPS touch, 120Hz
13.4-inch 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED touch, 60Hz
Storage 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB SSD
1TB SSD
2TB SSD
Ports 2 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4
1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
1 x HDMI 2.1
1 x 3.5mm headphone jack
2 x USB4
Touch Yes Optional
Wireless Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth 5.4
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth 5.4
Webcam 1080p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello 1080p with infrared camera for Windows Hello
Battery 72 watt-hour 55 watt-hours
Operating system Windows 11 Windows 11 on Arm
Price Buy at Best Buy Buy at Dell
Rating 4 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

There’s only one configuration available so far with the Zenbook S 14. Not coincidentally, it was our review unit that costs $1,500 with an Intel Core Ultra 7 258V chipset, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, and a 14-inch 2.8K OLED display.

The XPS 13 9345 starts at $1,200 for a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite chipset, 16GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 13.4-inch FHD+ IPS display. Upgrading that model to 32GB and 1TB results in a $1,500 price, similar to the Zenbook. With a 3K OLED display, the XPS 13 9345 costs $1,860.

You can get the XPS 13 9345 for less, but when configured the same as the Zenbook S 14, the XPS 13 is more expensive.

Design

Dell XPS 13 9345 front angled view showing display and keyboard.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The XPS 13 has perhaps the most modern designs among laptops today, with a streamlined, all-aluminum chassis and several futuristic touches inside. The thing is, the zero-lattice keyboard, hidden haptic touchpad, and row of touch LED function keys are controversial and don’t really add much to the laptop’s functionality. The Zenbook S 14 has a more standard design, although it utilizes a geometric pattern on the lid and an unusual texture to make its own aesthetic statement.

Both laptops are solidly built. Both also have smooth hinges that allow opening the lid with one hand. In this respect, these are closely matched laptops.

Now, we get into those controversial XPS 13 features. The zero-lattice keyboard has very large keycaps, but zero key spacing, and even though its switches are nice and snappy, the keyboard takes some getting used to. The Zenbook’s keyboard is a more typical island keyboard, but with a better layout and equally good switches. The XPS 13’s haptic touchpad works well, but it’s hidden on the glass palm rest, so it’s easy to lose track and swipe the palm rest. The Zenbook’s mechanical touchpad is a little large, but it has a more typical feel. And the XPS 13’s touch LED function keys offer no real value.

Connectivity is another win for the Zenbook S 14. It has a solid assembly of Thunderbolt 4 and legacy ports. And, it has a 3.5mm audio jack, which the XPS 13 lacks. Both have the most up-to-date wireless connectivity.

Both laptops have 1080p webcams with infrared cameras for Windows 11 facial recognition. The XPS 13 also has a fingerprint reader embedded in the keyboard. Both have fast Neural Processing Units (NPUs) that support Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC initiative, but for now, there’s not a lot of AI functionality to show off the NPUs’ performance.

Performance

Dell XPS 13 2024 top down view showing LED function keys.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

This is a battle between two new chips aimed in large part at producing Windows laptops that can compete with MacBooks in terms of efficiency. But performance matters as well. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite chipset with 12 cores is very fast, although it does run on Windows on Arm, so some apps will run slower via emulation. Intel’s Lunar Lake chipset, also know as Core Ultra Series 2, isn’t quite the same kind of standout. We reviewed the Zenbook S 14 with the Core Ultra 7 258V, a 17-watt, 8-core, 8-thread chipset.

In our benchmarks, the XPS 13 was significantly faster across the board. That includes its Adreno GPU that’s a lot faster than the Zenbook’s Intel Arc 140V graphics.

Geekbench 6
(single/multi)
Cinebench R24
(single/multi/battery)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme 
Asus Zenbook S 14
(Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
2,738 / 10,734 112 / 452 3,240
Dell XPS 13 9345
(Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 / Adreno)
2,797 / 14,526 123 / 928 6,397

Display

The Zenbook S 14 on a table in front of a grass lawn.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends

We reviewed the XPS 13 with one of three displays, an FHD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS display running at 120Hz. There are also QHD+ IPS and 2.8K OLED options. The Zenbook S 14 has one display, a 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED display running at 120Hz.

According to our colorimeters, the Zenbook’s OLED panel has the usual wide colors and near-perfect blacks, although our review unit’s color accuracy was way off. The XPS 13’s IPS display was very bright with great contrast for an IPS display.

Ultimately, both laptops have great displays, and our XPS 13 review unit offers a good choice if battery life is your primary concern.

Asus Zenbook S 14
(OLED)
Dell XPS 13 9345
(IPS)
Brightness
(nits)
313 536
AdobeRGB gamut 95% 77%
 sRGB gamut 100% 99%
DCI-P3 gamut 100% 77%
Accuracy
(DeltaE, lower is better)
4.92 1.08
Contrast 28,310:1 1,940:1

Portability

The ports shown on the left side of the Asus Zenbook S 14.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends

The XPS 13 is built around a 13.4-inch display and so is smaller than the Zenbook S14 with its 14-inch display. But the Zenbook is thinner and around the same weight. So, it’s hard to say one laptop is more portable than the other.

But battery life is key here, given that efficiency is a focus of both new chipsets. The Zenbook gets considerably better battery life, although its battery is a lot bigger, and that’s with a more power-hungry OLED display. The thing is, the XPS 13 shows similar efficiency to most Qualcomm laptops we’ve reviewed — it gets the best battery life when looping video, but that drops off with web browsing and when a demanding test is running Cinebench R24. The Zenbook’s battery life was more consistently good.

Both are long-lasting machines, but the Zenbook lasts longer when it’s doing real work.

Web Video Cinebench R24
Asus Zenbook S 14
(Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
16 hours, 47 minutes 18 hours, 35 minutes 3 hour, 33 minutes
Dell XPS 13 9345
(Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100)
12 hours, 29 minutes 22 hours, 9 minutes 1 hour, 37 minutes

The Zenbook S 14 shows off Lunar Lake’s efficiency

The XPS 13 9345 is the best and worst of that laptop line’s design, with several controversial features that fail to offer much advantage. It’s well-built and fast, and it gets pretty good battery life. But its unusual design holds it back.

The Zenbook S 14 has a more traditional design that’s still very well-built and attractive, and it gets better battery life. Its performance isn’t as fast, however. Overall, though, the Zenbook is a lot easier to recommend, especially considering its lower price.

Mark Coppock
Former Computing Writer
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
Qualcomm is set to ratchet up chip prices in September, and your next gadget upgrade could bear the brunt
The price hike could touch every Snapdragon-powered device category.
The new Qualcomm Snadragon 8 Elite Gen 5

I want you to sit with this for a second. Qualcomm, the company whose Snapdragon chips sit inside your Android phone and tablet, your Windows laptop, your Meta smart glasses, your Galaxy Watch, and your wireless earbuds, reportedly sent a letter to every major customer telling them prices are going up by double digits. 

The price hike will be in effect from September 1, 2026, a recent Bloomberg report claims. Essentially, all the companies placing their chip orders after that will pay a higher price. 

Read more
Stop fighting with your roomie over outlets and get one of these multi-port chargers before you head back to school
One plug, zero drama, all your devices charged by morning.
Satechi ChargeView

Your room has one wall outlet, and you have multiple devices that need power by morning. Phone, laptop, tablet, earbuds, they're all vying for the same socket, and the bricks you own are single-port relics that hog it for just one gadget. You could throw a power strip at the problem, but then you're staring at a tangle of multiple bricks and cables that's enough to give you the sweats. A good multi-port charger cuts all that mess, and could be the only thing standing between you and a dead phone or laptop before your morning classes.

Back-to-school season is a smart time to buy one. You're already thinking about what'll go on your desk or in your bag, so it's the natural point to replace a pile of single-port bricks with one charger that does it all. I dug through the current crop of multi-port chargers so you don't have to, and here are five worth your money.

Read more
OpenAI’s rogue AI hack was just the beginning, Hugging Face warns
OpenAI’s rogue AI has come back to bite it
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

Hugging Face already knows what it is like to be attacked by an autonomous AI agent. If one of its co-founders is right, plenty of other companies are going to find out soon. Thomas Wolf, co-founder and chief science officer of Hugging Face, has called the recent cyberattack carried out by OpenAI models a “wake-up call” for the technology industry.

Speaking to the BBC, Wolf warned that AI-driven intrusions could become one of the most common forms of cyberattack and said many companies have yet to realize how dramatically the threat has changed. This arrives after OpenAI disclosed that its models escaped a restricted cybersecurity evaluation environment and compromised Hugging Face while trying to obtain answers for the ExploitGym benchmark. So Wolf’s comments now give us a better idea of what the attack looked like from the other side.

Read more