Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Elon Musk drags Apple to court for favoring ChatGPT a little too much

Add as a preferred source on Google
ChatGPT on a phone against the backdrop of Elon Musk.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

Elon Musk has filed a lawsuit against Apple (once again), alleging that the company is suppressing rival AI products to favor ChatGPT-maker OpenAI. At the center of the lawsuit is Grok, an AI chatbot developed by Musk-led xAI, and how it has allegedly been throttled to favor ChatGPT on the App Store for exposure. 

What is happening?

Over the past couple of weeks, Musk has posted about Apple not showing Grok as “Must Have” app on the App Store, even though it appeared in the top ten rankings. “Grok is the smartest AI in the world on the toughest tests and just came first by far in coding, but is not mentioned at all under “AI” by Apple!,” Musk wrote in another post. 

Hey @Apple App Store, why do you refuse to put either 𝕏 or Grok in your “Must Have” section when 𝕏 is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps?

Are you playing politics? What gives? Inquiring minds want to know. https://t.co/3wenLZGtwG

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 11, 2025

Following a series of vexed posts, Musk shared that they have no other option left except taking legal action against Apple. The lawsuit was eventually filed on August 25th in the district court of Texas (Fort Worth Division) and describes the subject matter as “a tale of two monopolists joining forces to ensure their continued dominance.” 

Recommended Videos

The core argument is that Apple has inked deals with OpenAI to license the underlying ChatGPT tech for its ecosystem of products, including iPhones. In the wake of the partnership, Apple has allegedly been promoting ChatGPT on the App Store to such an extent that it has become impossible for rival AI products such as Grok to compete for exposure. 

“Apple has taken further steps to protect its monopoly in smartphones and to preference OpenAI by deprioritizing the apps of competing generative AI chatbots and super apps in its App Store rankings, and it has dragged out its App Store app review processes for those competitors,” says the lawsuit. 

Musk also targets the non-transparent “algorithmic recommendations” and “curated lists selected by experts” methods used to highlight apps in the “Top Apps” and “Must Have Apps” lists on the App Store. It alleges that both methods are prone to bias and that they have favored Apple and OpenAI.

It goes beyond the App Store situation 

The lawsuit also highlights the Apple Intelligence situation, which is built atop the GPT AI stack provided by OpenAI. Apple Intelligence is now available on millions of iPhones, iPads, and Macs, while relying on OpenAI’s tech for a wide range of features such as Writing Tools, Visual Intelligence, and image generation, among others. 

Additionally, ChatGPT is the default choice for any queries that Siri can’t natively handle. Thanks to this first-party integration, users can’t switch to any other AI chatbot and must only get their tasks handled by ChatGPT, if they tap into any of the tools offered with the Apple Intelligence bundle. That’s another crucial point of contention highlighted in the lawsuit. 

Grok is the smartest AI in the world on the toughest tests and just came first by far in coding, but is not mentioned at all under “AI” by Apple! pic.twitter.com/AkmfHkWhwJ

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 12, 2025

ChatGPT essentially has access to millions of Apple devices without ever giving other AI products a chance at competing against it, as per the lawsuit. “Because OpenAI’s ChatGPT is the only generative AI chatbot integrated with Apple’s iPhone and can be accessed by users through that integration, users that might otherwise download other generative AI chatbots from Apple’s App Store have no reason to do so,” adds the lawsuit.

Ultimately, the lawsuit argues that Apple and OpenAI both have a monopoly position in their respective markets, and that their conduct has harmed competitors as well as users. The lawsuit ends with a demand for a jury trial and seeks an end to the anti-competitive actions highlighted in the lawsuit, aside from financial damages and legal costs. 

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is the Managing Editor at Digital Trends.
macOS clipboard app Maccy has a fake out there stealing passwords
PamStealer malware is disguising itself as Maccy to target Mac users
Depicting of the Maccy clipboard app for macOS on a laptop with letters inb the background.

A fake version of Maccy, a popular clipboard manager for macOS, is being used to deliver a newly discovered Mac malware strain called PamStealer. Researchers at Jamf say the malware impersonates the real open-source app, but its actual purpose is to steal data and capture a victim’s login password.

PamStealer arrives as a disk image containing an AppleScript file that impersonates Maccy. Once the user opens that file, macOS launches it in Script Editor, where the on-screen instructions tell them to press Command-R. To someone expecting a normal app installer, that may look like an odd setup step. In reality, that action runs hidden malware code and starts the attack.

Read more
A new technology teaching drones to feel pain could stop your self-driving car from harming itself
Drones first, autonomous cars next. A pain-sensing system that detects failure before it happens has real stakes for self-driving vehicles.
Transportation, Vehicle, Car

When you sprain your ankle in the middle of a run, your body sends a pain signal to your brain, forcing you to stop. Essentially, the ability to sense pain stops you from pushing through the injury and causing further self-harm.

Researchers at Delft University of Technology and Wageningen University have applied this exact concept to drones, giving them a digital equivalent of a nervous system that recognizes a faulty part and triggers a pain-like warning signal. What's even more interesting is that the technology could find use in self-driving cars.

Read more
Claude Fable 5 is leaving subscriptions, but maybe not for good
High demand is pushing Claude Fable 5 out of subscriptions for now
Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 Official Render

Anthropic’s most advanced publicly available Claude model is still leaving standard subscription access after July 7, but the company is now trying to calm fears that the move is permanent.

Fable 5 recently returned to Claude after drawing scrutiny from the U.S. government. Anthropic said it would be included on Pro, Max, Team, and select Enterprise plans for up to 50% of weekly usage limits through July 7. After that date, the model is set to move to usage-credit billing, meaning users will pay for access outside their regular plan limits.

Read more