Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

Summer Storms Spur Electronics Warnings

Add as a preferred source on Google
Summer Storms Spur Electronics Warnings
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Summer is reaching its height in the northern hemisphere, and with it has come another round of speculation whether cell phones—or Apple’s ubiquitous iPod media players—attract lightning. In 2005, a Canadian jogger was struck by lightning while listening to his iPod; the bolt threw him two and a half meters, ruptured his eardrums, and left him with a broken jaw and a Y-shaped burn on his neck and chest where electricity leapt up the earphone wires. Last year a Colorado teen suffered similar (though less severe) injuries when lightning struck nearby while he was mowing the lawn—and listening to Metallica on his iPod.

So: do iPods attract lightning?

Recommended Videos

In a word, no. The strong consensus in the medical and scientific communities is that personal electronic devices like cell phones and iPods do not increase the odds of being struck by lightning. However, the proliferation of personal electronics is changing the nature of injuries individuals may suffer as a result of a strike.

On average, the Earth sees about 100 lightning strikes a second, and even though it’s a rare thing, around the world people are struck by lightning on a fairly regular basis. A lightning strike can be fatal, but lightning often flashes over a person’s skin—which isn’t very conductive—and discharges into the ground. Sometimes individuals suffer only a mild burn and disorientation—many can’t recall being struck.

However, mobile phones, iPods, personal media players, headsets, GPS devices, and similar items put significant quantities of metal and other conductive material in contact with or next to users’ bodies. Lightning bolts can carry up to 300 million volts at ranges from (say) 10,000 to 200,000 amps, which is more than enough power to overwhelm, melt, and ignite batteries, cases, internal components, and headphone wires. One result is a growing number of cases where users suffer contact burns and other injuries from lightning strikes and other freak electrical accidents.

The effects aren’t limited to electronic devices: keys, tools, rivets, glasses, zippers, buttons, snaps, and other metal items—even the underwires in bras—can cause similar injuries. A number of lightning-related injuries have also been caused by discharges carried through corded telephones. However, personal electronics often put conductive items near their faces, eyes, and ears, increasing the likelihood of vision damage, hearing loss, or facial disfigurement.

So, go ahead: use your electronic gizmos! But also exhibit common sense when lightning is in the area: get indoors. If you must be outside, avoid elevated areas, tall nearby objects like trees, and bodies of water.

[And yes, we warned you last year, too.]

[Thumbnail image by Darren Brown, public domain.]

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
The Apple Car may be dead, but it became the foundation of Apple Intelligence
A decade of work on a canceled car project reportedly laid the groundwork for Apple Intelligence.
Apple Intelligence in Apple Car

The Apple Car may have never left the garage, but it apparently gave birth to Apple's AI ambitions. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple's canceled autonomous vehicle project, one that consumed more than a decade of work and over $10 billion before being scrapped in 2024, ended up laying the technological foundation for Apple Intelligence. In a rather ironic twist, one of Apple's most expensive failures may also become one of its most important long-term investments.

The Apple Car forced Apple to think like an AI company

Read more
Researchers hid a prompt injection inside a PNG, and AI fell for it
Hacker

AI coding assistants like Claude are becoming every developer's favorite coworker. They can review code, explain confusing functions, and even write entire features with a single prompt. But new research suggests that this growing trust could also become their biggest weakness.

A team of security researchers (professor Sudipta Chattopadhyay and researcher Murali Ediga) has demonstrated an unusual attack that doesn't target the AI model directly. Instead, it targets what the AI doesn't pay enough attention to during code reviews. Rather than hiding malicious instructions in lines of code, the researchers tucked them inside an image file. Since many AI review tools treat images as decorative assets rather than as something worth inspecting, the pull request can appear perfectly harmless and sail through the review.

Read more
AI has already fallen into the wrong hands and they’re using it to make bombs
Logo, Text

Artificial intelligence has quickly become the go-to tool for everything from writing emails and summarizing meetings to helping students study or developers debug code. But the same technology that saves people time can also be misused, and a new report suggests that terrorist organizations are finding ways to do exactly that.

According to a research paper shared with The New York Times ahead of its publication, researchers found evidence that members of Boko Haram have been using popular AI chatbots to support both day-to-day activities and combat-related tasks. Interviews with 27 former members conducted in Nigeria over the past two years suggest that tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek were used to gather technical information, troubleshoot weapons, and even assist with planning attacks.

Read more