Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Health & Fitness
  4. News

This attachment turns your phone into a web-conneced opthalmoscope

Add as a preferred source on Google

Going to the doctor’s office sucks, but at least we can go. For millions of people worldwide, healthcare is not easy to come by. There are parts of the world (even in the US, believe it or not) where healthcare is too expensive for the majority of the population, and doctors set to serve the area are ill-equipped. On the other end of the spectrum, there are often cases where the doctor has to go to the patient, and no matter how well equipped the doctor, they don’t want to have to tote a massive machine with them to do an exam — and now they don’t have to. D-EYE is a portable retinal imaging tool a little bigger than your finger that attaches to smartphones to show and capture high-def images and video of the inner eye.

Designed by ophthalmologist Andrea Russo, and tech development firm Si14 SpA, the D-EYE is essentially a tiny ophthalmoscope designed to help change a saddening statistic from the World Health Organization: the fact that, of all the visual impairments people suffer from worldwide, 80 percent can be prevented or cured through access to examinations and care.

Recommended Videos

The D-EYE lens mounts onto a bumper –a frame that goes around the phone– and links to the accompanying smartphone app, where doctors can control the device and also set/review patient files — a handy built in feature. Once attached, the D-Eye grants a  5-8 degree view of the retina through an undilated pupil, and up to 20 degrees or more if you move it as close to the eye as possible. There, it can show a clear image of the retina, optic disc, macula, fovea, and posterior pole or, in layman’s terms, the inside of the eyeball. Unlike an average opthalmoscope, however, D-EYE displays all images in large format on the doctor’s phone screen, and also records the entire examination so it can be viewed again later on.

lotus823 test 1

Of course, it helps if you have a steady hand. The device works by using the smartphone’s LED and camera using a combination of beam splitters and levers. Using the smartphone’s autofocus, the D-EYE can compensate between -10D myopia (nearsightnedness) to +10D hyperopia (farsightedness).

The device and app are only set up to work with the newer iPhones and Samsung Galaxies, in part because it requires the bumper which only comes in those sizes. The cameras themselves are 400 EUR, or about $445. The bumper is another 40 EUR, or $45, while the accompanying smartphone app is free. Later this year, the D-EYE company plans to introduce a cloud service for medical professionals that would store and share medical images, the kind of thing that would make it easier for one doctor to send X-rays – or, say, shots of your inner eye — to another.

Aside from designing and manufacturing mobile exam devices and their companion applications, the D-EYE company also develops and runs Platform-as-a-Service systems for healthcare applications. A general theme of their work seems to be enhancing the way we all live, work ,and play; and new tech that makes this easier and more affordable is a means to an end.  If you want to see the D-EYE for yourself, the company will be showing off their tech at the American Optometric Association Conference in Seattle, June 25 to 27.

Aliya Barnwell
Former Contributor
Aliya Tyus-Barnwell is a writer, cyclist and gamer with an interest in technology. Also a fantasy fan, she's had fiction…
After a week with Gemini Notebook on my Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, I can’t imagine using it on a slab phone
Computer, Electronics, Screen

Gemini Notebook has become one of the apps I use more than almost anything else. Whether I'm researching for a feature, studying for hours, or trying to make sense of a stack of PDFs, it's almost always open somewhere on my phone. Over the past years, I've used it on just about every kind of device imaginable, but one thing kept bothering me. It never really felt like a notebook.

Don't get me wrong — it worked perfectly well on a regular phone. All the features were there, and I never felt like I was missing anything. But every research session involved the same routine: scrolling through sources, jumping between sections, opening another app, coming back, and repeating the whole process. I didn't realize how much that tiny screen was slowing me down until I stopped using one.

Read more
ChatGPT Pro replaced Gemini Notebook as my favorite research app, and I didn’t see it coming
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

I've been using Gemini Notebook ever since it launched, and for the longest time, it was my go-to app for just about everything. Whether I was researching a topic, organizing work, or studying something new, it became one of those apps I instinctively opened without thinking. When Google kept adding new features, I genuinely believed it had secured a permanent spot in my workflow.

Then, almost without realizing it, ChatGPT Pro took over. I've been using its Work mode for a while now, and somewhere along the way, it replaced Gemini Notebook. Of course, it wasn't an overnight switch. I kept bouncing between the two for weeks, but I gradually found myself reaching for ChatGPT every single time instead. At some point, I realized I hadn't opened Gemini Notebook in days. Now, I honestly don't use it at all.

Read more
AI chatbots will happily create fake news articles, and tests show ChatGPT is the worst at it
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

The biggest AI chatbots are supposed to help people find information, not manufacture misinformation. But a new investigation suggests that separating those two jobs isn't as straightforward as many AI companies would like users to believe. A series of tests found that several leading AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Meta AI, could be persuaded to generate fake news stories, fabricated headlines, and even realistic-looking screenshots of well-known media outlets. While every chatbot showed some weaknesses, ChatGPT reportedly performed the worst, producing the most convincing fake content with surprisingly little effort.

The findings come from an investigation by German newsroom CORRECTIV, which tested how the AI assistants responded when asked to create false reports involving sensitive topics such as election fraud, government coups, war, vaccines, climate change, and conspiracy theories.

Read more