Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Business
  4. News

Uber hack traced back to Lyft, report claims

Add as a preferred source on Google

updated 10-08-2015 by Jeremy Kaplan: Added comments from Lyft.

Smartphone-centric taxi cab service Uber has flourish in recent years, spawning a host of similar services in the process. Competition in this marketplace is fierce — and today we’re seeing the lengths that the company’s competitors will go to in search of a foothold.

Recommended Videos

In February Uber announced that a hack carried out in 2014 might have exposed the personal information of up to 50,000 drivers. At the time, the company simply stated that this breach was carried out by an “unauthorized third party.” A new Uber investigation into the hack has turned up an IP address that had access to a security key that was used in the breach, according to a report from Reuters — and here’s where things take a turn toward the world of corporate espionage.

That IP address has been linked to Chris Lambert. the chief technical officer of Uber rival Lyft, Reuters said, citing anonymous sources. In response to these claims, a spokesman for Lyft told Digital Trends it flatly denies any involvement on the part of the company or Lambert.

“Uber allowed login credentials for their driver database to be publicly accessible on GitHub for months before and after a data breach in May 2014. We investigated this matter long ago and there are no facts or evidence that any Lyft employee, including Chris, downloaded the Uber driver information or database, or had anything to do with Uber’s May 2014 data breach.”

The Reuters report doesn’t actually suggest that Lambert carried out the attack; only that further investigation into Lambert’s access could uncover the guilty party. That being said, there’s a certain level of intrigue with the CTO of a rival company being implicated in this manner.

Uber’s investigation into the breach — not to mention the legal proceedings happening as a result — are ongoing. It remains to be seen whether this issue is a squabble between two organizations attempting to corner the same market, or a legitimate case of wrongdoing on the part of Lyft.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Meta’s detection tool fails to identify photos generated by its own Muse Image AI
Meta has created an invisible watermarking tool called Content Seal that is embedded in all images generated by the Muse Image AI.
Meta AI identification tool.

Earlier this week, Meta announced two new AI products, namely, Muse Image and Muse Video. As the name suggests, these are generative AI tools for making photos and video clips using natural language text prompts. Soon after their rollout commenced, these tools sparked controversy because Meta had automatically opted in Instagram users, allowing others to use their publicly posted media and convert them into remixed AI content. But it appears that Meta courted another loss on its side of the court.

What's the problem?

Read more
Your Google AI Studio apps can finally have polished, presentable web links
AI Studio web apps can now use personalized subdomains
google ai studio logos

Google AI Studio has made building a web app surprisingly easy. You can describe what you want, refine the design through prompts, and publish the result without setting up a traditional development environment. An awkward point of friction comes after deployment, when the finished app still has to live behind a long, forgettable Cloud Run link.

Google is now cleaning up that final step. AI Studio lets you assign a deployed web app a personalized address under the “ai.studio” domain, such as “your-app-name.ai.studio.” A recognizable URL should make the project look more presentable in a portfolio, client demo, social post, or internal project page.

Read more
You can now check if a Google ad was made using AI
Google will auto-label its own AI ads, but third-party AI ads still rely on advertisers to come clean.
google-ads-ai-label

Ever looked at an ad and wondered if a real person made it or if it was AI generated in seconds? Google is now giving you a way to find out.

The company just announced a new AI transparency label that tells you whether an ad was created or edited using generative AI tools. The label lives inside Google's My Ad Center, and it is rolling out across Google Search, YouTube, and Discover globally.

Read more