Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Business
  4. Web
  5. News

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg explains why he is not giving his $45 billion to charity

Add as a preferred source on Google

Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg defended his philanthropic plans earlier today, disclosing the goals of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, where 99 percent of his wealth will be distributed.

This follows criticism of the LLC company Zuckerberg set up to distribute his wealth. Some commenters suggested that he should’ve set it up as a charity, and others have said it is a way for him to dodge taxes on investments.

Recommended Videos

“By using an LLC instead of a traditional foundation, we receive no tax benefit from transferring our shares to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, but we gain flexibility to execute our mission more effectively,” says Zuckerberg in the Facebook post. “In fact, if we transferred our shares to a traditional foundation, then we would have received an immediate tax benefit, but by using an LLC we do not.”

Zuckerberg wrote that the shares would be used to fund non-profit organizations, make private investments, and to “participate” in policy debates. The last part is essentially lobbying, which Facebook does quite a lot of already in the U.S., alongside its other neighbouring Silicon Valley friends.

Most of the investments will be targeted at education, science, health, Internet access, and inclusion, according to Zuckerberg. He named a few of those investments further in the post, and they included Startup:Education, the Breakthrough Energy Coalition, the CDC Ebola Response, and the San Francisco General Hospital.

The post still didn’t touch on the fact that Zuckerberg is able to save a substantial amount by moving stock, rather than cash, into an LLC company. Forbes contributor Robert Wood says: “Why donate stock? With stock, the donor gets a charitable contribution deduction based on the fair market value of the shares. Value and basis are different things, which can mean enormous tax advantages.”

Berkshire Hathaway owner Warren Buffett uses the same stock investment strategy, according to Wood, to keep a larger proportion from being taxed by the government. That said, both Buffett and Microsoft founder Bill Gates have fought against lower taxes for the super wealthy.

Is Zuckerberg doing this out of self-interest or the goodness of his heart? Like so many of Facebook’s philanthropy plans, we suspect it is a bit of both. These uber-rich billionaires probably do want to make the world a better place, but most likely are not happy giving millions more over to the government.

David Curry
Former Contributor
David has been writing about technology for several years, following the latest trends and covering the largest events. He is…
Meta’s new AI can generate images of you from your Instagram, and you’re opted in 
Meta's approach to Instagram likeness rights with Muse Image raises questions that a watermark alone doesn't answer.
Instagram Muse Image

Meta launched Muse Image on July 7, 2026, and while it’s an exciting development, buried inside all the announcements is something that deserves a closer look. 

If your Instagram account is public, strangers can use your photos to generate AI images of you via Muse Image. More importantly, it's switched on by default.

Read more
Meta’s new image and video AI tools let you turn Instagram into your creative mood board
Two models, one launch, and an Instagram trick nobody else has.
Art, Collage, Face

Meta has been cooking something up, and today, it finally put it on the table. On July 7, 2026, Meta Superintelligence Labs launched Muse Image and Muse Video (in preview), its first in-house media generation models. 

The rollout comes with a few features that are genuinely hard to argue with.

Read more
Social media ban for young users is proving to be an age verification nightmare
A fake birthday is enough to beat Australia's social media ban on teens.
Social media apps on smartphone

Australia’s world-first teen social media ban was supposed to keep children under 16 away from popular platforms, including Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and X. While this was a major controversial change, it appears that getting around it was barely even a challenge.

Researchers created 50 test accounts across nine of the ten platforms covered by the law. Each account claimed its user was 16, the minimum permitted age. None of the platforms asked the researchers to provide proof or complete another age-assurance check. Only the Australian livestreaming platform Kick refused to create an account without a proper age verification.

Read more