Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Android
  4. Apple
  5. Business
  6. Mobile
  7. News

California anti-encryption bill proposal might force Apple to stop sales on its home turf

Add as a preferred source on Google

A week after New York state pushed an anti-encryption bill into the hands of the state assembly, California followed suit with its own bill, which could require manufacturers to make smartphones that can be decrypted and unlocked.

Introduced by California assembly member Jim Cooper, the bill is almost a carbon copy of the New York bill. It asks for manufacturers or operating system providers to include a method for unlocking all phones upon request. If the bill passes through both the state assembly and the state senate, all phones manufactured on or after January 1, 2017 would have to have encryption backdoors to be sold legally in California. The law would also penalize the manufacturer with a $2,500 fine for each smartphone that doesn’t abide by the law.

Recommended Videos

The bill might force a pause in sales for Apple in its hometown. The iPhone maker added strong encryption to its devices last year, and Google followed suit shortly afterwards with similar encryption on Android. Although many in the U.S. government believe that encryption hinders law enforcement investigations, Apple and Google argue that it’s a matter of user privacy.

Apple shows no signs of stopping its fight for encryption on smartphones, either. The company’s CEO Tim Cook recently questioned President Obama‘s stance on privacy and surveillance, and he has commented on various pieces of anti-encryption legislation in the United Kingdom and United States in the past. It seems likely that Google and Apple will both fight against the bill, though neither have commented on the new anti-encryption legislation.

Despite Cook’s strong support for encryption, a $2,500 charge each time an iPhone doesn’t have a backdoor might force Apple to change its tune — Unless Apple intends to boycott California and not sell iPhones in the state until the law is reversed.

It does seem like a long shot for California, considering some of the biggest tech companies are based in Silicon Valley. Google and Apple both have headquarters in the state, and even foreign manufacturers like Samsung, LG, and Huawei own labs there. Banning encrypted devices from California might create an uproar among smartphone fans and the companies that make the devices.

We’ll keep you updated on the bill’s progress.

David Curry
Former Contributor
David has been writing about technology for several years, following the latest trends and covering the largest events. He is…
TSMC might set up a price hike that could come straight for your next phone, laptop, or tablet
Here's what TSMC's rumored 10% chip price increase actually means in dollar terms, and why your next phone or laptop could end up costing more.
TSMC Fab

My wallet flinched the second I saw the words "TSMC" and "price increase" in the same headline, and honestly, yours should too.

Turns out the company behind the silicon powering basically every flagship device out there, including Apple’s A-series and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, is reportedly about to make all of it a little pricier.

Read more
Samsung’s free storage doubling for preorders is gone in Austria, and the replacement isn’t as sweet
Samsung's free storage doubling deal might just be history.
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

If you've pre-ordered a Samsung foldable purely for the free storage bump, tomorrow's Unpacked event might sting a little.

For years, pre-ordering a new Galaxy meant automatically getting double the storage at no additional charge. Buy the 128GB model, walk away with 256GB for the same price. The same applied to the 256GB and 512GB models. However, that might change at the upcoming Galaxy Unpacked event. 

Read more
Apple fixes Hide My Email bug that exposed users’ real email addresses
Here's how Apple's Hide My Email flaw leaked real addresses for over a year, and why it only got fixed once the story went public.
apple-merging-sign-in-with-apple-hide-my-email-icloud+

Turns out the "Hide" part of Hide My Email wasn't doing its job quite as advertised, something that I covered early in July. Security researcher Tyler Murphy reported the flaw in June 2025, but despite Apple claiming it was resolved in March 2026, independent tests confirmed it remained exploitable, at least until July 3, 2026.

So how did this bug actually work?

Read more