Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Select delivery location

Polar M600 Sports Smart Watch

4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars 232 ratings

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Brand POLAR
Model Name 90063087
Style M600
Color Black
Special Feature Heart Rate Monitor
Shape Round
Target Audience Unisex Adult
Age Range (Description) Adult
Compatible Devices Smartphone
Band Color Black

About this item

  • Wrist heart rate monitor: accurate wrist-based heart rate monitor with personalized training guidance to reach your fitness goals
  • GPS watch: built-in GPS Technology keeps track of your pace, distance and altitude
  • Waterproof fitness tracker: customize your M600 activity tracker to fit your style with interchangeable, waterproof wristbands
  • Display: 240×240 pixel. Full Android wear ecosystem: notifications, social features, weather, calendar, maps, 3Rd Party Apps via google play. Smart coaching: running index, Sport profiles, hr zones, training benefit
  • Please refer to the iOS/Android Comparison Chart for full features.Please review user manual attached below for item troubleshooting.
  • Resolution: 240 X 240; Water Resistance: Waterproof (suitable for swimming)

From the manufacturer

Smartwatch with GPS and music

Track your speed, distance and route with the integrated GPS and GLONASS. Enjoy your favorite tunes with Google Play Music and 4GB of onboard storage.

The waterproof smartwatch to track your every move

With Polar’s advanced training features and 24/7 activity tracking, Polar M600 offers personalized guidance and feedback for training and daily activity. Track your workouts, 24/7 activity, steps, distance, calories burned and sleep.

Smart Coaching meets smartwatch

Polar’s unique Smart Coaching features turn your activity and training data into actionable insights. Polar Smart Coaching does the data-crunching for you so that you can focus on what’s important.

Wrist-based heart rate monitoring

Polar M600 features the proprietary Polar wrist-based heart rate measurement technology, optimized for Polar M600. Simply tighten the band and you’re ready to train.

Best of android wear 2.0

Polar M600 allows you to make the most out of the Android Wear 2.0 smartwatch OS. Receive calendar notifications, read and reply to messages, listen to music, find yourself on the map and access even more apps via Google Play – all on your wrist.

Best of Android Wear 2.0

Get assistance on the go

Music while you train

Watch face for every situation

Features

The smartwatch built for sports

Polar M600 is robust, waterproof and built to last. In addition to the color touchscreen, it has 2 buttons for quick control during training.

Designed for fitness and sports

Run, swim or work out... Polar M600 does it all. Polar Running Program sets you up with a personal plan for your next event. With the Polar H10 heart rate sensor you can crush goals in the weight room and connect to your favorite gym equipment. You can even track your laps in pool with swimming metrics.

Polar Flow: A world of fitness

The Polar Flow app and web service allows you to plan your training sessions and set targets, draw motivation from tracking your long-term progress and share your training with friends – or the whole world.

Specifications:

  • Powered by Android Wear 2.0 smartwatch OS.
  • 4GB internal storage for music and apps.
  • Durable and scratch resistant Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display.
  • Up to 2 day battery life/8 hours of training (with Android phone), 1 day/8 hours of training (with iPhone).
  • Equipped with GPS and GLONASS, 6 LED optical heart rate measurement sensor, Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Gyroscope, Vibration motor and Microphone.
  • Waterproof for up to 10 meters (IPX8), suitable for swimming.
  • Bluetooth 4.2 and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n connectivity.
  • Changeable silicone wristbands in black, white and red.
M600 M430 A370 M200 V800
Customer Reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
232
4.3 out of 5 stars
1,042
4.1 out of 5 stars
327
Wrist-based heart rate
GPS with mobile phone
Smartphone notifications
Smartwatch OS (Android Wear)
Music storage and playback When connected to Android devices
Swimming metrics
Connectivity with Bluetooth Smart sensors Heart rate Heart rate, Stride Heart rate Heart rate Heart rate, Cadence, Speed, Power, Stride
Battery life (activity tracking/GPS) 2 days with Android, 1.5 days with iPhone / 8 h 20 days / 8-30 h (low-power GPS) 12 days / N/A 6 days / 6 h 30 days/ 13-50 h (low-power GPS)
Changeable wristbands

Product Description

Polar M600 is the best in market sports optimized sport watch including the so far missing killer app for Android wear. Polar M600 is a waterproof smartwatch that comes with Polar’s unique Smart Coaching features that turn your activity and training data into actionable insights. In M600 we complete the Android wear feature set with Polar Smart coaching and training experience. Compatible with Polar Flow mobile app via Bluetooth Smart.

Product information

Technical Details

Additional Information

Feedback

Polar M600 Sports Smart Watch

Polar M600 Sports Smart Watch


Found a lower price? Let us know. Although we can't match every price reported, we'll use your feedback to ensure that our prices remain competitive.

Where did you see a lower price?

Fields with an asterisk * are required

/
/
/
/
Please sign in to provide feedback.

Product guides and documents

Looking for specific info?

Customer reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
232 global ratings

Customers say

Customers have mixed opinions about the sleep monitor, accuracy, appearance, battery life, connectivity, performance, and ease of use of the wearable computer.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

89 customers mention49 positive40 negative

Customers are mixed about the performance of the wearable computer. Some mention that it performs well for running and other training profiles, and works great as an Android watch as far as functionality with the apps available. However, others say that it is highly unreliable, not good enough to be a daily wear smart watch, and does not work as advertised. Some customers also say that the GPS software stopped working suddenly on the 3rd week but recovered.

"...So far I'm loving the M600. Android Wear is super fun, slick, and working perfectly with my Moto X. No complaints on the smartwatch side of things..." Read more

"...This renders the watch's screen completely useless and I can't tell you how many corners I stood at pressing the screen trying to resume a run,..." Read more

"...Both of these watches are great smartwatches first and okay fitness watches second. With normal use, both easily last two days...." Read more

"...Works great as an Android watch as far s functionality with the apps available...." Read more

45 customers mention20 positive25 negative

Customers are mixed about the accuracy of the wearable computer. Some mention that the GPS/GLONASS seems very accurate, and they could track their runs with GPS and heart rate monitoring all while listening to music. However, others say that it's very inaccurate when monitoring your heart rate and calories, and the heart rate monitor is spotty at best.

"...GPS/GLONASS seems very accurate as well. I live in Pittsburgh, so mostly cloudy all the time with a few months of clear skies...." Read more

"...However, in intervals shorter than 30 secs, the m600 can miss things, not getting there before the interval is over, for example a quick lifting set..." Read more

"...-Great activity tracking; sinks with Strava-Waterproof!-Built in GPS: tracks activity without having phone nearby..." Read more

"...No heart rate is tracked. I still have an unlock that I bought for Sleep as Android when I had the 360, so I may give that a try...." Read more

45 customers mention16 positive29 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the connectivity of the wearable computer. Some find the Android pairing to be a godsend, and the apps automatically sync to the watch. They also appreciate the full integration with MyFitnessPal. However, some customers report issues with the Bluetooth connectivity, saying that the response and connection time are slow.

"...Sometimes it's too responsive as it brushes against the thigh as I run (I wear the watchface on the inside of my wrist) but it's not a big deal to..." Read more

"...Android Wear works great and the apps automatically sync to the watch. Subtle vibration on my wrist for notifications...." Read more

"...The one downside of the Polar app is that it seems to only sync when I open the app on the phone; there does not seem to be any way to sync fitness..." Read more

"...life, a mobile app that leaves nothing to be desired, full integration with MyFitnessPal, and all the same run metrics presented in a logical manner..." Read more

38 customers mention15 positive23 negative

Customers are mixed about the battery life of the wearable computer. Some mention it has great battery life, while others say it drains quickly.

"...heartrate sensor, and streaming music, it’s expected the battery drains much quicker. Also claims 18 hrs battery life with normal use...." Read more

"...Battery life lasts about 2 days with frequent use --- slightly less when in GPS mode-..." Read more

"...Mid-run, EVEN AFTER DISCONNECTING FROM THE PHONE, it would drain so quickly that it was always a gamble if it would make it through a 3 hr run (tops)..." Read more

"...To sum up:Pros: Battery life, Music playback, reactive HRM, syncing, phone & web app..." Read more

25 customers mention17 positive8 negative

Customers are mixed about the sleep monitor. Some mention that they love the heart rate monitor while swimming, and the tracking is fairly accurate. However, others say that the sleep monitoring features are next to worthless, and that the pulse detection doesn't work.

"...Samsung Gear S and Gear S2 both have GPS, heartrate sensor, and onboard music with the Tizen OS and smart notifications...." Read more

"...The heart rate is as accurate as one can expect of a wrist based device, and the GPS is always within a reasonable margin of error when compared to..." Read more

"...The sleep monitoring features are a wash because you have to charge this thing constantly so it only makes sense to do it at night...." Read more

"...It has a built in heart monitor and will track your sleep and quality of sleep as well as daily exercise goals on the watch front which you can..." Read more

23 customers mention9 positive14 negative

Customers are mixed about the ease of use of the wearable computer. Some mention it's very accurate and user-friendly, making it easier to configure more sports and customize data displayed during. However, others say the interface went from intuitive to annoying, frustrating, and difficult to use. They also say the process is very complicated to establish and the watch could come with more instructions.

"...the gestures awkward, "swipe to nothing" screens and such made navigation miserable...." Read more

"...The touchscreen, too, is easy to use, responsive, but not freaking out (except when water runs on it, as in the shower, then it has a seizure)...." Read more

"...step of setup, to install the Polar software on the watch, the step never completed and I had to reset the watch and start over from the beginning...." Read more

"...With normal use, both easily last two days. The Tizen OS is easy to navigate and the app store is growing rapidly...." Read more

22 customers mention15 positive7 negative

Customers are mixed about the appearance of the wearable computer. Some mention that it looks good, is well designed, and colorful. Others say that it's not the best looking thing, is chunky, and has poor design.

"...So far I'm loving the M600. Android Wear is super fun, slick, and working perfectly with my Moto X. No complaints on the smartwatch side of things..." Read more

"...The Vantage V isn't small either, but it has a more classic watch look rather than time-traveler band so it blends better and I can wear under a cuff..." Read more

"...In comes Polar M600. Yes, this looks like a sport watch. Not your classic watch look...." Read more

"...Sounded great. When I got it and set it up it looked good - my only complaint was that the watch face was much smaller than the Sony, but if all..." Read more

15 customers mention4 positive11 negative

Customers find the wearable computer to be bulky and heavy.

"...sits in a rubberized strap for removal/cleaning, which makes it large/bulky. Was difficult wearing under a dress shirt as a daily activity monitor...." Read more

"...In all honesty, it's not the best looking thing, and it is pretty chunky, but I was looking more for functionality than fashion, so it's fine." Read more

"...Pros:-Relatively inexpensive-Not bulky or obstrusive (for a larger wrist)-Great activity tracking; sinks with Strava..." Read more

"...Common complaints and my responses:- It's large and heavy - you won't miss it on your wrist.I don't find this to be the case at all...." Read more

Refuses to sync Google account after wear 2.0 update.
1 Star
Refuses to sync Google account after wear 2.0 update.
Got this last night. Phone pairing and much of setup was ok, but account syncing was painful (the part where, after pairing with my Android phone - a Samsung Galaxy S6 - I say "yes, let it read the contacts/calendar/etc of this Google account").Then the watch updated to Wear 2.0. this took a while but after it finished Wear 2.0 appears to have a significantly improved UI. Unfortunately, it now completely refuses to communicate with my phone to sync accounts. I have been stuck looking for at least 2 hours at the screen on my phone in the attached image.I've read a few forums and so on including clearing and resetting the Android Wear profile on my phone and the phone from the watch (with all cache clearing I can) but am still stuck. So I have to review this 1 star since the OOBE is so poor.Two more notes: I have two Google accounts on my phone. One GAFYD that I prefer to use for most functions and one regular Gmail account for all the things that don't work with GAFYD (like my Google music account). Polar might be stumbling over this - all I know is that it doesn't work and they don't seem to have documentation on how to resolve the issue.EDIT: one week later my phone is now on its way back to Polar for evaluation to try to get it to be able to pair with my Android accounts. It's frustrating that this doesn't work.I also have serious problems with the GPS accuracy. I've only just raised these with Polar and their customer support has been great, so we'll see where it goes (and also if the issues are resolved when I get my fixed or replacement watch), but here's what I saw.First run: the GPS log seems unreliable. First, it seemed to come up short vs. what I think this course to be [aside: it would be natural to read my review and think "yeah, dummy, you're slower than you think" which might be true - however I did bring this with me while I was doing measures on a candidate USATF calibration course I started scoping last week, so I know at least a bit of what I'm talking about]. So it seemed short and I looked at the data and it seems like some corners may be getting rounded a bit. Also - in the data import to Strava, there is a strange point where the tracked route jumps back on itself and simply retraces the route again. This is worrisome because the Strava data shows different pace information for that doubled segment (so which one is trustworthy? I don't know...). When viewing the training session in Polar Flow, I see the maybe-rounded-corners, but I don't see the "jump back" behavior.Second run: I bring my phone, too, and let my phone and the M600 both publish results to Strava. The phone says 4.5 miles and the M600 says 4.2 - I think I trust the phone. This run also shows the "jump back" behavior at one point.Third run: again I bring my phone - the phone says 4.6, the watch says 4.4 miles.The sections where the GPS accuracy seems to struggle are in an urban setting with buildings. The segments with a clear view of the open sky show pretty nice straight lines. And more significantly, where I am doing an out & back section of a run, the lines from the M600 appear tighter (i.e. *more* accurate) than the phone.I should also mention that one thing I really wanted from the watch is a pretty accurate HRM, and the HRM data looks fantastic to me based on the times I've been able to use it.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2016
I'm coming from Forerunner 230 (with strap), a running watch that also gets notifications and has some apps/watchfaces through Connect IQ. So far I'm loving the M600. Android Wear is super fun, slick, and working perfectly with my Moto X. No complaints on the smartwatch side of things, tons of apps, instant notifications, great watchfaces, double thumbs up all around. M600 wins there, no problem.

For exercise tracking: I run, lift, and do yoga. I'm enjoying easily tracking all of these things with just a wrist device (no straps, no phone) and all in one app (Polar Flow). Heartrate: I've done some comparing of the HR with a Wahoo Tickr and Rhythm+ paired with Forerunner. At first I thought the m600's HR was garbage, but then I realized I was strapping it on too tightly! It doesn't have to be tight at all, and I now find the m600 brilliant at steady state runs, tracking +/-3 or so with any of the other straps. It's a little less strong with intervals, as it seems to lag about 10 seconds before it realizes my effort has changed--it gets there, it just catches on slower than the HR straps. This isn't really an issue in intervals that are longer than, say, a minute. However, in intervals shorter than 30 secs, the m600 can miss things, not getting there before the interval is over, for example a quick lifting set, or a vinyasa (in yoga, a jump-plank-pushup-up/down dog-jump move, dynamic, heart jumps 15-20 beats in 10 sec). In addition, the m600's HR falters pretty badly for me if there is any weight on my hands (as in a pushup). No problems in running, but the watch misses a 10 sec, weighted-hand, vinyasa every time. Clearly it is optimized for running, where it excels. Still, I don't really need HR for yoga, so it doesn't feel like a big loss. On the whole, HR is not as good as a strap, but it is good enough. If you need super accuracy, go with a strap. (m600 can pair with a strap if you prefer.)

The Polar Flow app is good, has all the data there that Garmin has (at least that I'm noticing), maps, charts. My daughter also has a polar watch and we can see each other's feeds and comment. Seems like exporting data might be more of a pain with Polar than Garmin (except with Strava and TrainingPeaks). I've used Endomondo and Smashrun and it doesn't seem like I can link to those accounts with this new watch. It might be possible, but it isn't obvious. Garmin was easier for this.

The m600 screen is bright and colorful and easier to read than the sorta dim Forerunner. For outdoors training sessions, turn on the "leave screen on during activity" and then the backlight stays on during my run and is perfectly visible the whole time. This setting is a single swipe up from training screen. Keeping the backlight on hits the battery a little--more of an issue if you train for multiple hours. With the backlight always on, there is zero trouble seeing the screen outside in full sun and there is no dimming when your arm is down. But I think the screen is great. I have a watchface (Muzei) that shows me a different famous painting every day, very beautiful and colorful, I smile every time I look at my watch. The touchscreen, too, is easy to use, responsive, but not freaking out (except when water runs on it, as in the shower, then it has a seizure). Sometimes it's too responsive as it brushes against the thigh as I run (I wear the watchface on the inside of my wrist) but it's not a big deal to flick it back.

Vibration: definitely less buzzy than the Forerunner. Which I kind of like--it's more discreet. I get a text on the Forerunner and everyone looks at me because they all hear the buzz, too. On the m600, I'm the only one who feels it. It's sufficient to signal me while running. I haven't tried it as an alarm.

Other qualities: the GPS is fine. The screen customization (to get the fields I want) is great. These are equal to Forerunner.

Complaints: I wish there was an on-watch interval function the way the Forerunner has. You can have structured workouts with the Polar Flow app on the computer and then download whatever you want with intervals based on time, pace, or duration (or a combo)---but it's a bit of a pain. I liked the ease of an on-watch, simple, a/b interval timer. Also, it doesn't have a manual lap button. You can set the autolap to whatever distance you want, but sometimes I don't want an autolap, I want my own lap. Maybe it will come in an update. Also doesn't have cadence. These are not deal breakers for me.

Battery: I've been plugging it in every night. With a couple hours of GPS with backlight on, there is no problem getting to the end of the day (but definitely you won't get two full days). Charging at night means I'm not sleeping in it, so I'm not using the sleep tracking function, nor the alarm. The Forerunner goes a week or more on one charge, so Forerunner wins that one. On the other hand, the m600 charges really fast, reaching full charge in an hour or so for me.

I have tiny, bony wrists, and it is a little chunky. But not really more than the Forerunner, as the m600 curves around my wrist. Maybe I'm just used to having a chunk of stuff on my wrist from the Forerunner. I'll call this one a wash.

On the whole, this watch is a great step up for me. Some learning curve, as with anything that has this much customization. But it's doing everything I wanted it to do for exercise tracking, and the Android Wear has been lots of fun. I feel like a dork talking to my wrist, but it's cool to be able to answer texts right from my watch, or get my pulse, or check the weather, etc. I'm looking forward to Android Wear 2.0 coming in the next few months. I haven't tried any of Polar's training plans, but that might be fun to try, too.
37 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on November 30, 2016
I’ve literally purchased hundreds of items from Amazon and this is my first-ever review written on Amazon (or anywhere for that matter).

I’ve spent a significant amount of time researching fitness smartwatches, and I think the Polar M600 is the best offering out there to date based on my criteria. Things I care about:

- GPS tracking
- Heart rate monitor
- Onboard music storage
- Smart notifications
- Battery life

I’ve had the Polar M600 for about a month now. I will admit the first device I received from Amazon had a defective microphone, where the ‘Ok Google’ feature wouldn’t work. Polar and Amazon customer service were great and Amazon quickly replaced the device. I am a multi-sport athlete, where I run distance, trail running, hiking, obstacle courses, skiing/snowboarding, golf, biking, and occasional softball. I started out with the Motorola MotoActv years ago as a gift and had a great experience with it. Obviously outdated today and lacking full activity tracking, heart rate monitoring, and the smart app experience, I decided to jump onto the smartwatch bandwagon. When smartwatches really started becoming popular a couple years ago, I was probably one of the first people to buy the Samsung Gear S (3G version). I later upgraded to the Samsung Gear S2 Classic (3G version). I am an Android guy, but I have no loyalty to the operating system as long as it works. So I didn’t care if it was Android Wear, Tizen, Apple, or whatever proprietary OS it used as long as the above criteria could be met.

There are some very good fitness watches out there today. Some with smart notifications. One of the biggest drawbacks for me is that I like to run and workout while listening to music but without hauling my phone with me. A watch and Bluetooth buds are the perfect combination for me. Problem is that there aren’t that many options out there with onboard music storage. The Gear S, Gear S2, and Polar M600 are the only watches I can speak to from personal experience. My feedback on the others below is purely based on research and critic and user reviews.

Sony SW3 runs on Android Wear and has GPS and onboard music. No HR monitor however. Reviews indicate quick battery drain w/ GPS and music streaming.

Moto360 Sport runs Android Wear and has GPS, onboard music, and HR sensor. Battery life with normal use is about 1 day and using GPS alone is about 4 hours. Not sure how much time you get w/ GPS, music, and HR running together.

TomTom Spark 3 Cardio (or Adventurer) has GPS, heartrate sensor, and onboard music. No smart notifications or add’l apps however. Good battery life. A tempting alternative if you don’t care about the smartwatch/notifications part.

Apple Watch Series 2 has GPS, heartrate sensor, and onboard music w/ Apple’s OS and notifications. Reviews indicate decent battery life (4-5 hours with GPS running). However, when running GPS, heartrate sensor, and streaming music, it’s expected the battery drains much quicker. Also claims 18 hrs battery life with normal use. So, you have to charge every night and maybe wouldn’t use for sleep tracking. No interface with an Android phone, so I haven’t pursued this. Would likely be a solid option for iPhone users.

Amazfit Pace being released next month, which includes GPS, heartrate sensor, and onboard music w/ its own OS and smart notifications. Claims excellent battery life. Unclear as to what sport profiles exist beyond running, walking, hiking (ie skiing/snowboarding/cycling/golf/indoor workouts/etc?) or add’l apps for download. Interested to see what comes of this.

Samsung Gear S and Gear S2 both have GPS, heartrate sensor, and onboard music with the Tizen OS and smart notifications. Both of these watches are great smartwatches first and okay fitness watches second. With normal use, both easily last two days. The Tizen OS is easy to navigate and the app store is growing rapidly. The two drawbacks of these devices (and the reason why I switched to the Polar M600) are their limited sport profiles and battery drain with GPS/music streaming/HR monitoring. First, Samsung S Health is a great fitness app… on a phone. On the watches themselves, the sport profiles are limited to running, jogging, hiking, stair-climbing, cycling, and walking. Nothing specific to track indoor strength training, crossfit, circuit training, aerobics, or any other outdoor activities like skiing/boarding or golf. While these other profiles exist amongst hundreds of others on the S Health phone app, Samsung has yet to expand the # of profiles (or customization of) on the watch. But okay, fine. I could live with what was available on the watch and find 3rd party apps for other sports. The major problem is this. If you are running with GPS, heart rate sensor, and streaming music (even with 3G cellular service turned off), you’re lucky to get over an hour of battery before it dies. I ran a half marathon with the Gear S (no music, just GPS and HR), and it had about 15% remaining after 1 hr 47 mins. I regularly would run 5-6 miles with the Gear S2 (with GPS, music, and HR) and would have under 20% remaining after 40-50 mins. The final straw was when I was running a 10-mile event and the S2 died under an hour (only using GPS and HR). It seemed that its GPS accuracy was way off as well.

Personally, I decided that my priority was for a fitness watch that could reliably last through whatever sport or activity I was doing. 2nd priority was for something with onboard music storage and smart notifications. Even though I don’t listen to music during long-distance events, I have low confidence that the Samsung watches would last (verdict is still out on the new Samsung Gear S3). And my confidence is even lower for multi-hour events like a ToughMudder or Spartan Beast.

In comes Polar M600. Yes, this looks like a sport watch. Not your classic watch look. As stated above, I’m into sports and interested in function, so I don’t really care how it looks. I don’t think it’s any bigger than the Samsung S2. I was a little concerned as I have smaller wrists, but after putting it on, I think it looks fine. Heart rate sensor uses an advanced six LED sensor and seems to be very accurate. I easily created a music album with 300 songs on Google Play Music app and wirelessly transferred my music to my Polar M600 (basically the same setup as music transfer for the Gear S2). Android Wear works great and the apps automatically sync to the watch. Subtle vibration on my wrist for notifications. Some say it’s too weak a vibration, but I have no problem telling when something comes in.

The Polar M600 is definitely a fitness watch first and smartwatch second. The Polar Flow app works very nicely and syncs automatically between your phone and watch. Sleep tracking works well. And plenty of metrics to compare from workouts, like speed, heart rate, and altitude. GPS/GLONASS seems very accurate as well. I live in Pittsburgh, so mostly cloudy all the time with a few months of clear skies. Despite that, it normally takes about 10 seconds to grab the GPS signal. Even downtown around buildings, it picked up GPS in under 30 seconds. Polar Flow also lets you customize which sport profiles you want available on the watch, which is very nice. You can choose up to 20 profiles to select directly on the watch (that covers any basic or extremist need for athletes). Polar has a golf profile, which I haven’t used yet. However, I believe it is just an activity tracker and not a shot tracker. Luckily, there are several Android Wear apps available to track your golf game that I plan on trying in the spring.

Now to the best part, battery life and lasting through my workouts. I basically exercise daily, and am using some combination of HR/GPS/music streaming or all 3 together for an hour each day. With workouts on top of regular use for notifications/etc, this watch easily makes it over 2 days. Most mornings after a full day of use + workout, I still have above 60% remaining when I wake up. Many days, closer to 70%. The watch also charges very fast. I take it off for about 30-40 minutes in the morning when showering/getting ready for work, and it reaches 100% charge. Sure it would be nice to last a week+ without charging. But I don’t mind taking it off for the 30 mins and it’s also nice knowing that I can get another day or two out of it anyways. Any watch running a smartwatch OS (whether it is Tizen, Apple, or Android Wear) is going to eat battery faster than the other fitness watches (like Garmin, TomTom, or FitBit). It’s just the nature of having an OS constantly running. That will hopefully continue to improve over time, but 2+ days is pretty good right now.

The real test for me was how it would hold up on outdoor runs, using GPS, HR monitoring, and music streaming. After testing it on multiple 5-6 mile runs, the battery drain averages just around 8% (40-45 mins timeframe)! That tells me that this watch could last 8-10 hours using GPS/HR/music streaming. That competes with the TomTom Spark 3’s GPS life, which still lacks the smart notifications/Android Wear feature.

Despite the mixed reviews on the M600, I’m happy I decided to give it a chance. So far, so good.
203 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2017
This product, for this price, easily competes with any other fitness smart watch on the market. Prior to purchasing this watch, I did some intensive research and almost purchased the Garmin Fenix 5 -- I am happy that I did not. This was a gift purchased for my boyfriend and most of this review is his feedback.

Pros:
-Relatively inexpensive
-Not bulky or obstrusive (for a larger wrist)
-Great activity tracking; sinks with Strava
-Waterproof!
-Built in GPS: tracks activity without having phone nearby
-Can store music on the watch (He bought wireless headphones so he connects them to the watch and that is all he needs when out on runs)
- Battery life lasts about 2 days with frequent use --- slightly less when in GPS mode
- Has all the features and convenience of any other smart watch (using with Android)
-Can easily change wrist band

Cons
-GPS may not be very accurate. For example, when taking a 6 mile hike with 2000 ft of elevation change, watch significantly under-estimated distance traveled. This does not seem to be the case when using on flat ground.
- Not for those with smaller wrists; I bought that as a gift for my boyfriend and seriously considered getting one for myself, but it was much too large. See comparison photos.
Customer image
4.0 out of 5 stars Best fitness smart watch; not for smaller wrists
Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2017
This product, for this price, easily competes with any other fitness smart watch on the market. Prior to purchasing this watch, I did some intensive research and almost purchased the Garmin Fenix 5 -- I am happy that I did not. This was a gift purchased for my boyfriend and most of this review is his feedback.

Pros:
-Relatively inexpensive
-Not bulky or obstrusive (for a larger wrist)
-Great activity tracking; sinks with Strava
-Waterproof!
-Built in GPS: tracks activity without having phone nearby
-Can store music on the watch (He bought wireless headphones so he connects them to the watch and that is all he needs when out on runs)
- Battery life lasts about 2 days with frequent use --- slightly less when in GPS mode
- Has all the features and convenience of any other smart watch (using with Android)
-Can easily change wrist band

Cons
-GPS may not be very accurate. For example, when taking a 6 mile hike with 2000 ft of elevation change, watch significantly under-estimated distance traveled. This does not seem to be the case when using on flat ground.
- Not for those with smaller wrists; I bought that as a gift for my boyfriend and seriously considered getting one for myself, but it was much too large. See comparison photos.
Images in this review
Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image
Customer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer image
14 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Karina Guzmán
5.0 out of 5 stars Producto útil y fácil de udar
Reviewed in Mexico on January 26, 2020
Muy cómodo y fácil de usar, lo que podrían mejorar es el tiempo de duración de la bateria
Amazon Customer
1.0 out of 5 stars Delay not receiveing on time
Reviewed in India on December 7, 2018
Watch delay
Álvaro
4.0 out of 5 stars Pocas opciones para IOS
Reviewed in Mexico on May 12, 2019
No hay mucha información de cómo utilizarlo. Deberás de contar con conocimientos adquiridos y sobre todo no hay muchas opciones para IOS
Maria Magdalena Gris
3.0 out of 5 stars no funciona como se indica
Reviewed in Mexico on December 16, 2020
No registra el entrenamiento como se ajusta de acuerdo al perfil de actividad, sin razón alguna se desconecta del teléfono y no registra los notificaciones de éste. Tampoco da seguimiento al ritmo cardiaco de manera continua.
José A.
1.0 out of 5 stars Resultó malito el producto
Reviewed in Mexico on August 2, 2019
En menos de tres años (no uso rudo) empezaron las fallas, el touch dejó de funcionar, para rematar cambie a un móvil Samsung Galaxy y nunca lo pude sincro izar