Skip to main content

Motorola Droid Razr Review

motorola-droid-razr-screen-front
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Motorola Droid Razr
“If you like it's looks and size, the Motorola Droid Razr is a great option for those on the hunt for a powerful, fully-featured smartphone...”
Pros
  • Thin design
  • Good battery life
  • Bright Super AMOLED screen
  • Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) coming by early 2012
  • Verizon's 4G LTE network rocks
Cons
  • Design is logo heavy
  • Power and volume buttons are small
  • NinjaBlur interface is lifeless
  • Smart Actions and MotoCast need work
  • Camera is weak

UPDATE: Owners of the Droid Razr and Razr Maxx can now download Android 4.0. Read our hands-on impressions of the Razr Maxx with Android 4.0 (7/12/2012). While reading, keep in mind that the original Razr does not get as good of battery life, though it is acceptable.

Recommended Videos

Droid and Razr. Motorola Mobility’s two claims to fame have been combined. With Samsung and HTC breathing down its neck, the Razr represent’s Motorola’s best chance at keeping the hundreds of thousands (maybe millions) of people who bought a Droid two years ago. But is it enough?

Design and feel

The Droid Razr is an interesting piece of industrial design. In some ways, it is exactly what it should be. At 7.1mm, it’s thinner than any other smartphone on the market (the iPhone 4S is 9.3mm thick), has a shiny dark gray frame, a big black Gorilla Glass screen, and even a woven Kevlar back. We don’t think it will stop bullets, but Motorola points out that the inner frame of this plastic phone is stainless steel, so it shouldn’t snap in your hands either. The phone is sturdy and thin enough that using a 4.3-inch screen becomes manageable.

motorola-droid-razr-button-detail
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are issues with the design too. From an aesthetic perspective, the back is a lot prettier than the front, but both sides are littered with too many Motorola and Verizon logos. The front has an overly visible front-facing camera and the half-tapered edges look a little busy and inconsistent. We’re also not quite sure why, except for vanity’s sake, the Motorola logo is put on bright, shiny silver. It distracts from the rest of the design. On the back, the top bump is a lot thicker than the advertised 7.1mm design and is actually a bit thicker than an iPhone 4S. Overall, we don’t dislike the look of the phone, but Motorola went to pains to make this phone super thin and attractive. We wish the manufacturer would have been a little more consistent or mindful of its design choices.

More importantly than aesthetics is functionality, and here Motorola has made a couple small missteps as well. Like other large 4.3-inch phones, the Droid Razr has both the volume rocker and power button on the right side. (This is because few people will be able to comfortably reach the volume controls if they were still on the left which is where they often are on smaller phones.) Unfortunately, both buttons are a bit too small, and placed too low on the phone. When trying to switch between volume and power, your thumb will get a bit cramped. It’s not a huge deal, but Motorola did a much better job making the volume and power buttons easy to use on devices like the Motorola Photon. The power button, especially, is the most important button on the phone and here it feels like an afterthought.

motorola-droid-razr-side
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The odd placement of the buttons and the strange decision to put all ports up top and make the battery non-removable all comes down to thickness. Motorola wanted the Razr to set a record, and the company did sacrifice some amount of comfort to do it. However, from a usability point of view, this phone could be a bit thicker in the middle and be a lot more comfortable for it. Sometimes being thin isn’t always best.

There is one upshot to the race to conserve space: Because there’s no removable battery, the SIM card and microSD card are more easily accessible on the side. This is a plus. It’s nice to be able to swap a SIM or memory card without the hassle that comes with removing the backplate of a phone.

Power and specs

You won’t find us complaining about the specs. The Droid Razr runs on a 1.2GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4430 processor, has 1GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, and comes with a 16GB microSD card. It’s as powerful a phone as you’re going to find this year. We did some benchmarking and in Quadrant, it got a score of 2,476, with subsequent tests coming out between 2300 and 2500. This is actually better than our recent tests on the 1.5GHz dual-core HTC Amaze 4G, and the Samsung Galaxy S II. However, the difference is mostly negligible. All three phones performed quite well.

motorola-droid-razr-android-osDid we mention that the Razr has a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED screen with a resolution of 540 x 960 pixels? Yep, you read that right: The Droid Razr has a Super AMOLED screen. This means it is instantly a helluva lot nicer to look at than any other Motorola phone this year. The Atrix, Photon, Droid 3 Droid X2, and Droid Bionic all used an LCD PenTile display that just didn’t display color well and had a visible subpixel grid that degraded the quality of the display, despite a high resolution. The new screen, which isn’t quite as rich as the Super AMOLED Plus display on the Samsung Galaxy S II, fixes one of Motorola’s biggest deficiencies.

Operating system

Motorola finally upgraded its screen technology, but it hasn’t yet designed a new interface to take advantage of it. The Droid Razr runs on Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) with a custom Motorola user interface layered on top of it called NinjaBlur. Motorola’s NinjaBlur adds almost nothing to the Android experience aside from some useful widgets. It’s ugly dark-blue-and-gray color palette does suck the life out of Android, though. Companies like Samsung and HTC have prospered by making Android more colorful and user friendly, but Motorola has yet to grasp the concept. Perhaps it’s a good thing that the company is being bought by Google. It might mean the end of its custom interfaces.

Still, Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) will be released in mere weeks, and it looks a lot nicer than previous versions. Motorola has promised that Droid Razr owners will get the update by early 2012. Here’s to hoping that the manufacturer just leaves Google’s work alone and releases it as-is. For more information, check out our guide to Android Ice Cream Sandwich.

The typical slate of non-removable Verizon bloatware is included on the Droid Razr. Apps for BlockBuster, Amazon Kindle, GoToMeeting, Let’s Golf 2, Verizon services, Netflix, and NFL Mobile are all baked into the phone, so get used to them.

MotoCast and Smart Actions

The two big features Motorola touted during the Razr’s unveiling were MotoCast and Smart Actions. We found both to be wonderful ideas, but quite rough around the edges.

MotoCast: By plugging the Droid Razr into your PC, you can install software that will let you access music or any other files directly on your Razr. It’s a cool idea, even if it treads on what Google is already trying to do with its cloud storage Google Music Beta service. The setup went decently well, but when MotoCast tried to index our 12,000 songs, the Razr flipped out. Instead of showing a loading screen, the Razr let us go back to doing whatever we wanted while it loaded songs in the background. This was a mistake. Within a minute or so, the screen began flickering and re-refreshing itself every two or three seconds, quite visibly. Anything we tried to do was halted every few seconds. After MotoCast claimed it was finished with the process, which seemed to drain a good portion of the battery in a matter of minutes, we rebooted the phone because it would not respond well.

Downloading songs from MotoCast onto the phone was an equally painful process, which crashed our notification bar and required another restart. The phone appears to be fine now, and does stream content fine, but it was not a pleasant encounter and it is unlikely we’ll use the product much. Let us know how your experience with MotoCast is in the user reviews section. We hope you don’t encounter these issues, but be warned.

Smart Actions: This app allows you to program your own sets of actions. For example, you could tell your phone to turn off data and turn on Wi-Fi when you arrive at home. Or maybe you can tell it to turn off all essential services when the battery hits 30 percent. The options are endless, and we don’t mind the interface. Sadly, we had some issues with this app as well. We tried to create a Smart Action that would launch an application (Cut the Rope) as soon as we entered our home, but could not get the program’s mapping software to figure out where we were. It showed our location, but took a full minute to download the map — a Bing Map. Subsequent tries were just as slow. We also tried to get the phone to auto open up Facebook whenever we used Motion (shook the phone). This did not seem to work either. We have gotten one action to work: when we plug the headphones in, YouTube opens. The idea behind this app is great, but it needs refining.

Camera

Like all Motorola smartphones, the Droid Razr isn’t going to win any awards for its camera. The camera has a slow shutter speed, a somewhat unintuitive custom camera app, and incredibly slow auto-focus. Don’t take a picture of anything moving because it will be gone before you’re able to snap the pic. The phone does pull in a bit more color and light than the Droid X2 and some earlier phones, but it’s a far cry from the cameras on a Samsung. Don’t even try comparing it to the HTC Amaze 4G or the  Apple iPhone 4S. It would be cruel.

motorola-droid-razr-camera-detail
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Still, the 8M-megapixel rear camera does take acceptable pictures and has a decent flash. The 1.3-megapixel front camera works as well, and the Razr can record video at 1080p, so all the elements are here. They just aren’t great. Don’t sell that point-and-shoot camera just yet.

Call quality and data speed

Call quality has been pretty stable. We did a few tests with the speakerphone, and aside from the usual ambient noise you hear on speakerphone, everything sounded pretty decent. On Verizon’s 4G LTE network, speeds here in Manhattan, New York City are holding up quite well. We got a consistent 9Mbps download speed and 6Mbps upload speed, which is quite amazing since our speeds when on Verizon’s DSL Wi-Fi were only about 11Mbps down and 1Mbps up. It’s entirely possible that Verizon’s high speed network is faster than a lot of wired, terrestrial connections.

Verizon’s LTE network continues to run circles around T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T’s “4G” networks. None of those carriers seem to be able to reach past 3.5Mbps download speeds on a continual basis, though T-Mobile does have spurts of 10Mbps speeds from time to time.

motorola-droid-razr-batteryBattery life

Aside from the thin design and the custom apps, the other big selling point of the Droid Razr is its battery life. Motorola is touting 12.5 hours of talk time and up to 16 days of idle time on its 1,780mAh battery. We aren’t seeing those numbers, but the battery life has been decent. It outperforms the Droid Bionic by a good deal, as well as the HTC Amaze 4G. However, the phone tends to get extremely hot (not burning hot, but noticeably hot) when using Wi-Fi or downloading a lot of data. During these times, the battery drained excessively fast. This is somewhat normal, but it shows that the Droid Razr is not on a different level as other smartphones. Motorola claims that you can save an additional 30 percent battery life if you use Moto Smart Actions properly. We tried to do this, and there are some good suggestions, but Smart Actions may be a bit difficult to use for beginners. Overall, the Razr performs better than a lot of recent smartphones when it comes to battery life, but the entire category needs some work. We’re beginning to wonder if we’ll ever be able to go a night without plugging in our phone.

Conclusion

If you like it’s looks and size, the Motorola Droid Razr is a great option for those on the hunt for a powerful, fully-featured smartphone this holiday season. With a dual-core processor, a big colorful Super AMOLED screen, good battery life, 4G LTE connectivity, and a thin profile, it’s a great option. The only thing we don’t know is how it will compare to the Galaxy Nexus. The good news is that Motorola is promising Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) by early 2012, so those who choose the Razr shouldn’t be in the cold for too long.

Highs:

  • Thin design
  • Good battery life
  • Bright Super AMOLED screen
  • Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) coming by early 2012
  • Verizon’s 4G LTE network rocks

Lows:

  • Design is logo heavy
  • Power and volume buttons are small
  • NinjaBlur interface is lifeless
  • Smart Actions and MotoCast need work
  • Camera is weak
Jeffrey Van Camp
Former Digital Trends Contributor
As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…
Motorola Razr tagged by iFixit as ‘most complicated’ phone for repairs
Folding the new Motorola razr.

iFixit's disassembly of the new Motorola Razr revealed a $1,500 device that most owners should not try to repair by themselves.

Motorola Razr Teardown - One of the Most Complex Phones Ever

Read more
Bixby vs. Google Assistant: Which AI is better for you?
google assistant mobile.

The world of AI has seen tons of innovation recently, with ChatGPT and OpenAI stealing much of the spotlight over the past year. However, ChatGPT is relatively new compared to two other AI platforms available in 2024 -- Samsung's Bixby and Google Assistant. And while Bixby and Google Assistant might not have the "cool factor" of emerging AI systems, there's no denying their versatility and functionality.
Google Assistant and Samsung's Bixby are available on a variety of Android devices. They'll both take commands and help streamline your daily tasks -- but is one better than the other? And are Bixby and Google Assistant compatible with all Android devices, or are they limited in their reach? More importantly, do they work on devices beyond smartphones?
Here's a comprehensive comparison of Bixby and Google Assistant to help you decide which fits best with your lifestyle.
Bixby vs. Google Assistant: device integration

Google Assistant is available on all Google Nest and Home products, including Android TVs, lights, security cams, speakers, and more. Google Assistant is also available on Android Auto, so you can use the virtual assistant to execute commands when you’re driving. Google Assistant is available on other brands' smart devices too, so you can use Google's voice assistant on Lenovo's Smart Home System. You'll also find it in all of the best Android phones, but did you know you can also download and use it on Apple iPhones as well?
Samsung’s Bixby, on the other hand, is limited to Samsung devices, like the Galaxy S23 Ultra. It's also limited to only being able to control other devices via the SmartThings app, rather than having native support. It’s not necessarily a bad thing, but it is more restricted. However, full functionality of Bixby is limited to newer devices, so unlike Google Assistant, which tends to be available to older devices, you'll need to keep upgrading to get the most out of Bixby.
This won’t matter much for users who’ve been using Samsung devices for years and want to continue investing in new Samsung products, but if you live with people using different Android devices, Google Assistant might be a better option for smoother integration across devices.
The winner is pretty clear here. Google Assistant is available on a lot more devices, including Apple iPhones, and helps you to create a comprehensive system for convenient use. 
Winner: Google Assistant
Bixby vs. Google Assistant: performance and accessibility

Read more
How to right-click on a Chromebook
The HP Dragonfly Pro Chromebook on a table.

Welcome to the world of Chromebooks! These budget-friendly laptops are a great middle-ground between mobile devices like smartphones and tablets, and more robust laptops and desktop PCs. There’s a bit of a learning curve to these Google-powered machines though, even down to how you’ll operate trackpad clicks. For instance, we’re sure you’re familiar with how to perform a right-click in Windows or macOS. You can also right-click on a Chromebook, but probably not the way you’re used to.

Read more