Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Apple
  4. Audio / Video
  5. Mobile
  6. Music
  7. Reviews

Apple EarPods Review

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Apple EarPods
MSRP $29.00
“When all is said and done, Apple’s new EarPods are an improvement on the earbuds they replace, but only marginally so.”
Pros
  • Considerably improved bass
  • Slightly better short-term comfort
  • Slightly larger in-line control microphone
Cons
  • Hot and brittle treble
  • Midrange sucked out
  • Still uncomfortable for long-term use

“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

After 11 long years, Apple finally decided it was time to update its ubiquitous white earbuds. During its September 12 launch event, Apple introduced the EarPods, calling attention to all the design and engineering efforts that had gone into their development. This immediately got us wondering: Will these EarPods actually be any better? After some considerable listening time with them, we have a verdict: the EarPods are different – better in some ways, even – but still a dud. Read on for our in-depth analysis.

Recommended Videos

Out of the box

The EarPods come packaged in typical Apple fashion, within a compact clear plastic case. It appears intended for repeated use, though we don’t think that’s a very practical idea: You have to wrap the EarPods back up exactly as they were at the factory, otherwise they don’t fit properly and, besides, the clear plastic lid doesn’t snap back into place very securely.

Features and design

We covered the crucial design changes when Apple announced the EarPods, but here’s the nutshell version: Apple has changed the shape of the earphones to allow for better comfort. The housing is all plastic and there is no longer a rubber ring running the perimeter of the earbud itself. To improve sound, Apple vented the EarPods in several places, citing improved bass and midrange reseponse, and changed the ‘buds’ shape so that sound is routed more toward the ear canal than it is toward the outer ear.

Apple Earpods headphones remote
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The only other noticeable physical change was made to the in-line microphone and controls, which is a bit longer than the previous version.

Comfort

The new EarPods do take a step forward in terms of comfort. The edges don’t feel as sharp when first placed in our ears and the contoured shape helps to make the earphones feel as if they were intended to be in the ear, while the old ‘buds always felt like foreign objects that had no business barging into our aural orifices.

Still, after about 45 minutes of use, we were ready to take the EarPods out. Apple’s design guru Jony Ive nailed it on the head when he said in this Earpod video: “making one headphone to fit everybody’s ears would be like trying to make one pair of shoes to fit everybody’s feet — I mean, it’s impossible.”

Indeed, despite Apple having “three-dimensionally scanned hundreds of ears for a commonality” so that the EarPods might fit a broad range of ears, they end up being just as uncomfortable in the long term; though, admittedly, it did take us a little longer to be fed up with them than it took with the older earbuds.

Security

Unfortunately, the EarPods don’t stay put any better than the original Apple earbuds. If anything, the rubber ring on the original version may have allowed for a little more grip. With the all-plastic EarPods, security remains an issue. We didn’t get a chance to get our sweat on, but we’re pretty safe saying the EarPods won’t make a great workout earphone.

Apple Earpods headphones top
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sound quality

Apple has significantly improved the bass response with the EarPods. This is easily the most discernible difference when compared to the old Apple earbuds, and we think that it might be just dazzling enough to have folks issuing a thumbs-up as a knee-jerk reaction. However, further scrutiny bears out that bass response isn’t the only thing that’s changed.

We noticed that Apple has significantly brightened up the treble output as part of its redesign. Some may enjoy this change, but we did not. We found that cymbals sounded brittle and guitar distortion sounded…well…distorted in the wrong kind of way. There’s the intentional distortion that guitarists implement and then there’s the unintentional distortion you get when you are listening to an underpowered or flat-out shoddy audio product that can’t handle what you throw at it. The EarPods reside firmly in the latter camp. We also didn’t care for the overtly hissy handling of sibilants (‘s’ and ‘t’ sounds).

The real loser in this fight to bring more treble and bass to the table is the midrange region. If the original Apple earbuds’ midrange and vocal response sounded tepid, then you’d have to say the EarPods sound chilly. Vocals seem recessed in the mix and a little thin, with too much emphasis placed on the upper portion of the mids with nothing in place to warm it up.

Apple Earpods headphones left
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sound isolation

There has been little to no change here, which should come as no surprise to anyone. Earbud-style earphones were never intended to shut out noise – there’s just no seal implemented to accomplish such a task. As such, we won’t bother to list is as a low-point in our synopsis. Expect to hear the outside world and for the outside world to hear a little of your music.

Conclusion

When all is said and done, Apple’s new EarPods are an improvement on the earbuds they replace, but only marginally so. It’s hard to imagine anyone would compare the two and express a preference for the older model. With that said, we had hoped for a little more from the EarPods. Comfort has been improved, but only enough to be a bit more tolerable for short term use. Bass has been beefed up considerably — and you won’t hear us complain about that — but treble is a little too hot and brittle for us now and the midrange sounds as if it has been sucked to the back of the room.

At the end of the day, Apple’s customers get saddled with the same lackluster product — just good enough to keep consumers in love with their new iOS devices, yet bad enough to send them running, money in hand, for a better option. From where we sit, it seems nothing much has changed.

Highs:

  • Considerably improved bass
  • Slightly better short-term comfort
  • Slightly larger in-line control micrphone

Lows:

  • Hot and brittle treble
  • Midrange sucked out
  • Still uncomfortable for long-term use
Caleb Denison
Caleb Denison is a sought-after writer, speaker, and television correspondent with unmatched expertise in AV and…
Apple’s lease program is just a soft landing for you to spend on pricier iPhones this year
Hand holding iPhone 17 Pro.

A few days ago, Apple introduced a new "Upgrade" program that is essentially a lease program for buying Apple hardware. Instead of paying the full cost up front, you space the monthly installments (12, 24, and 36 month spells), and at the end of the lease period, you can choose to return the device, upgrade to a new one, or pay the remainder cost and keep it forever.

The broad idea is simple. Instead of taking a thousand-dollar hit on the wallet, you space the hit across small monthly payments. For a flagship iPhone, that broadly comes down to a dollar per day, and for budget phones such as the iPhone 17e, it's just half a dollar each day, if you do the breakdown. At least Apple is looking at it that way.

Read more
Pixel 11 leak predicts a weird mix of upgrades and downgrades for a higher price
The Pixel 11 may start at $899 with 256GB of storage, but its camera setup remains unclear.
Google Pixel 10a smartphone

Google may ask Pixel 11 buyers to pay $100 more for a phone that improves the parts they can’t see while leaving a conspicuous camera question unresolved. A new leak from Android Headlines puts the base model at $899, up from the Pixel 10’s $799 starting price.

The extra money would at least buy more capacity. The Pixel 11 reportedly starts at 256GB rather than 128GB, while the leaked specifications list both 12GB and 16GB RAM options. Yet the same list mentions only a main camera and an ultrawide, even though other leaked renders still appear to show three rear camera openings.

Read more
Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold could offer Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra specs for $200 less
Google’s leaked foldable could match the Fold8’s price with Ultra-sized screens and 5x zoom
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Google may be preparing to challenge Samsung’s most expensive foldable without charging Ultra money. According to Android Headlines, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold will start at $1,899, matching the Galaxy Z Fold8 and undercutting the $2,099 Fold8 Ultra by $200.

Its rumored hardware makes that pricing especially interesting. Google’s foldable appears much closer to Samsung’s Ultra model in display size, even though it would cost the same as the smaller Fold8.

Read more