Skip to main content

Apple is hogging 60 percent of the world’s touch panel capacity

ipad-parts
Image used with permission by copyright holder

A couple months ago, we learned that Apple had pre-purchased 65 million iPad screens. Today, we’ve learned why. By arriving first on the market and pre-purchasing so many screens, Apple is now consuming roughly 60 percent of the entire world’s touch panel capacity, causing competitors to pay more in an attempt to outbid one another for the remaining screens, reports Digitimes.

While this is good for Apple, it is one of the major reasons that prices for Android tablets have been (and will likely be) higher than the iPad for the foreseeable future. The lack of panels also means that while top tier players like RIM, Motorola, and HP are able to obtain screens, second tier electronics makers are taking the brunt of the shortage. Capacitive glass touch panels are one of the toughest items to acquire. The shortages are partially why we’ve seen 7-inch tablets enter the market. Samsung, Acer, and HP (among others) have also turned to smaller touchscreen suppliers to help boost production and avoid shortages.

Our own Rob Enderle spoke of the competitive advantage Apple has bought itself in his article “Is Apple Invincible?” a few weeks ago, arguing that it’s difficult to see any competitor (except maybe HP) coming close to challenging Apple’s dominance in the tablet market this year. He may be right. There are a lot of competitors cropping up but none of them have been released yet. So far, only Samsung has dared challenge the iPad and it did so with the 7-inch Galaxy Tab. Perhaps price alone will stave off some of the competition. It must feel pretty good in Cupertino right now.

Jeffrey Van Camp
Former Digital Trends Contributor
As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more