Skip to main content

Steve Jobs allegedly denied knighthood by UK’s Gordon Brown

Steve JobsFormer UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown allegedly blocked Apple chief executive Steve Jobs from being knighted the Queen of England in 2009, reports the Telegraph. Brown’s denial of knighthood, an unnamed former senior Labour Party minister tells the Telegraph, was because Jobs turned down an invitation to speak at the Labour Party conference.

Apple’s revolutionary effects on the technology industry are said to have been the reason for Jobs’ recommendation for knighthood.

“Apple has been the only major global company to create stunning consumer products because it has always taken design as the key component of everything it has produced,” the MP said. “No other CEO has consistently show such a commitment.”

Despite the MP’s claims that Brown arranged for Jobs to not to be knighted, a spokeswoman for the former prime minister told the Telegraph: “Mr. Brown did not block a knighthood for Steve Jobs.”

Regardless of who or what stood in Jobs’ way, his lack of knighthood stands in stark contrast to Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who was knighted in 2005.

As Apple Insider points out, Gates does not carry the title of “Sir” because he is not a citizen of the British Commonwealth. Had Jobs received the honor, he would not have been titled “Sir,” either. Instead, the letters “KBE” are used. They stand for Knight of the British Empire.

Other Americans to receive the KBE honor include evangelist Billy Graham, former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani, actor Bob Hope and director Steven Spielberg.

Assuming the rumor is true, Steve Jobs would likely have had more pressing matters on his mind than receiving a symbolic honor in another country — regardless of that honors awesomeness. Remember, in 2009, Apple was in the pre-launch stages of the iPad, which has already changed the modern PC as we know it — a more amorphous achievement than being knighted, yes. But also far more impressive.

Editors' Recommendations

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more