Skip to main content

Apple ordered to pay university $234M after losing iPhone chip patent case

apple store
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Just a few days ago we heard how Apple had lost a patent case against the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), protector of the University of Wisconsin’s intellectual rights and patents.

A Madison, Wisconsin jury had on Tuesday decided that Apple’s A7, A8, and A8X processors, found in recent versions of the iPhone, as well as several iPad models, violate a WARF patent for improving chip efficiency.

According to Reuters, the same jury on Friday ruled that Apple should pay the university $234 million in damages for the infringement. While still a substantial amount, it’s nearly half of the $400 million WARF was claiming, and well down from the $862 million it was originally seeking.

As is usual in such cases, Apple said it plans to appeal the decision.

WARF managing director Carl Gulbrandsen described the jury’s decision as “great news,” adding that it was vital to defend the university’s inventions from unauthorized use by other companies and organizations.

The patent at the center of the case was granted in 1998 and was invented by a number of current and former researchers at the University of Wisconsin.

WARF’s legal team had demanded a royalty payment of $2.74 per device sold, while the iPhone maker, referring to a case in 2008 regarding the same patent where Intel settled for $110 million, said the rate should be just 7 cents per unit.

According to calculations made by the Wisconsin State Journal, the jury ended up choosing a royalty rate of around $1.60 per unit sold.

The court’s decision will boost the confidence of WARF lawyers who’re currently working on a second patent-related case against Apple. Launched last month, it centers on the latest A9 and A9X chips used inside the recently released iPhone 6S and 6S Plus devices, as well as the iPad Pro.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
iPhone 16: news, rumored price, release date, and more
A person holding the Apple iPhone 15 Plus and Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

We're a few months removed from the launch of the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro, so you know what that means: iPhone 16 rumors are in full force. Things are heating up, from design leaks and rumored specs to camera changes and more.

Read more
This is our best look yet at the iPhone 16’s big design changes
iPhone 15 Pro in Natural Titanium held in hand in front of a cement brick wall.

It seems Apple is prepping yet another design refresh for its smartphones this fall season. In 2023, the iPhone 15 Pro made an aesthetic deviation by serving thinner bezels and titanium looks alongside a new multi-function button. This year, it’s going to be the entry-point iPhone 16 and its Plus variant that are apparently lined up for a design refresh.

Tech commentator Sonny Dickson has shared dummy units reportedly depicting all four iPhone 16 variants, which seem to confirm what previous leaks have predicted so far. On the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus, the camera lenses dance diagonally on a square bump. Apple is reportedly ditching the current camera arrangement for their respective successors in favor of a pill-shaped vertical setup.

Read more
Everything Apple says is wrong about the DOJ’s iPhone lawsuit
The Apple logo on the iPhone 14 Pro Max.

The antitrust season is in full swing in 2024. This time around, Apple is in the cross-hairs of regulators, bringing back memories of the historic Microsoft antitrust case that unfolded over two decades ago. Back then, the focus was on Windows and web browsers. In Apple’s case, the iPhone is the centerpiece, with a wide ecosystem woven around it.

Experts say the case against Apple, which dives deep into monopolistic conduct, is surprisingly strong. The Department of Justice, in its lawsuit, has targeted everything from the iMessage “green bubble” mess and Apple Watch incompatibility situation to the locked app ecosystem and objectionable practices that Apple has put in place to maintain its alleged monopoly.

Read more