Apple is on the wrong side of the law when it comes to taxes once again — less than one month after being fined $14.5 billion for the company’s tax arrangements with Ireland, the company is being ordered to pay 12 billion yen, or $118 million, for underreporting income in both 2014 and 2015.
So how did Apple initially underreport its income? According to the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau, the company was sending portions of its profits to a unit located in Ireland, where it did not pay taxes on the international transaction. According to local news outlet Yomiuri Shimbun, iTunes Japan has to pay a withholding tax rate of 20.42 percent on any royalties that are paid to a foreign country.
Apple is coming under more and more scrutiny over its tax practices. As mentioned, Ireland has been ordered by the European Commission to collect a massive $14.5 billion from Apple, which reportedly had unfair agreements with the Irish government. Apple and Ireland both plan on appealing that decision, saying that the tax treatment falls in line with European Union law, but it does not undo how much scrutiny Apple is under.
“This claim has no basis in fact or in law. We never asked for, nor did we receive, any special deals,” the company wrote in a letter to customers. “We now find ourselves in the unusual position of being ordered to retroactively pay additional taxes to a government that says we don’t owe them any more than we’ve already paid.”
While the $118 million is a slap in the face for Apple, it is nothing the company will be seriously worried about — the company reported $234 billion in revenue during 2015, a figure that it is likely to at least come close to matching for 2016 considering the recent success of the iPhone 7 and the Apple Watch Series 2.
- Meet the European politician that Silicon Valley is terrified of
- The history of Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year
- Facebook says Apple didn’t let it tell users about App Store tax
- Election 2020: The presidential candidate’s views on tech
- Will Apple’s ‘eco-friendly’ plan to nix chargers actually help the environment?