Skip to main content

2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Review

2011 Dodge Challenger STR8 Review hood
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Meat and brawn, physical dexterity, the chops to take you down in one swift move. No, we’re not talking about Vin Diesel from the Fast and Furious movies. The 2011 Dodge Challenger is out for serious blood against similar muscle cars from Detroit like the Ford Mustang and Chevy Camaro.

Recommended Videos

Driving an all-white V8 model for a week, we found a few perks that impressed us beyond what even the Mustang 302 and Camaro SS offer (we’ve tested both souped-up versions of those cars in the past six months, including closed-track tests). The Challenger’s styling is arguably more of a throwback to the days when Starsky and Hutch were household names, but still sports fun digital perks, like in-car options for measuring braking distance calculator and a 0-to-60 timer.

That said, the Challenger has some tough competition that’s priced a hair lower. The 470-horsepower V8 Hemi model we tested costs $44,000, but even the base version with a V6 costs $24,895. Meanwhile, the base model Ford Mustang, which still has a 305-horsepower V6 engine, costs $22,310. The 2012 Camaro Coupe costs $23,200. Dodge, you have your work cut out for you convincing us.

2011-Dodge-Challenger-STR8-rear-side-view
Image used with permission by copyright holder

One early point of victory for the Challenger: we definitely prefer the starting block punch. In testing the Challenger V8 against the 302 and SS, the Dodge has some immediate urgency. There’s a real thrill in punching the sport mode button, squealing the tires, and gobbling up open roadway. In our tests, we achieved a best time of 4.6 seconds using the paddle shifters in sport mode with the traction control disabled. In the quarter mile, we hit 13.28 seconds at the flag, and ran the eighth-mile in 8.80 seconds. Those times are a bit under the rated specs that are just milliseconds lower. (Times are often dependent on the tires you use, the road you’re on, and the person doing the driving.)

The reason the Challenger felt more muscular off the block is that it has a 470-horsepower engine that delivers 470 lb-ft of torque, compared to the Camaro SS (420 lb-ft) and the Boss 302 (380 lb-ft). The Challenger has a lurching, burly drive – you feel every piston. This is not a German racing machine, so the gears shifts are more pronounced and even a bit jarring. Cornering on the Challenger is meant to be boxy and road-heavy in a good way, not at all like a Corvette that glides around curves.

Another major difference with the Challenger compared to the Mustang and Camaro: The styling is more like what you might remember from the 70s. There’s a decidedly classic-looking front end, with a smooth angular slope toward the back. Fortunately, even with this more reminiscent look, it was easy to see out of the Challenger, and we had plenty of headroom even with the sunroof door closed.

2011-Dodge-Challenger-STR8-right-side
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Our test model came equipped with a powerful 900-watt amplifier and a Boston Acoustics 18-speaker stereo system. With that much audio power, you can crank up the subwoofer to a point where the whole car shakes with each beat. Unfortunately, the audio quality was not great – the stereo lacked the distinct tones of luxury cars like the Audi A8, where you can pick up specific parts of a song. Instead, you get volume and a bit too much distortion. We ended up thinking most of the music we played had power but lacked tonal distinction.

Our test car was also outfitted with a performance suspension. At $44,000, all of the trimmings put it in a class where we had to compare the Challenger directly with other performance cars, including the Boss 302 and the Camaro SS. We ended up preferring those cars, but for entirely different reasons. The Camaro has a hungrier growl, especially in idle and also when you rip into the upper gears. On a lonely country road, we the Camaro SS punched through third and fourth gear with more power.

The Boss 302 is a racing machine that’s (barely) street legal. We remember careening around corners at insanely high speeds and noting that the car barely flinched. The Challenger may be outfitted with a racing suspension, but in our experience the car felt a bit unsure on tight corners. That means, against the Boss, you might get to the first marker before anyone else, but you’ll lose on the first corner.

2011-Dodge-Challenger-STR8-steering-wheel
Image used with permission by copyright holder

For fuel economy, the Challenger guzzles gas, but not quite as much as we expected. The 22MPG highway rating for the V8 is respectable, but around town we noted a 16MPG rating that meant we had to fill up twice in one week. The base-level Mustang gets 31MPG and the 302 gets 23MPG. The base level Camaro gets 30MPG, and the SS gets around 24MPG.

The Challenger is quite tight in the rear seats – passengers complained during a test drive almost constantly. There were a few other gripes as well: the trunk is unusually heavy, so kids who tried to open it had to struggle. We also had some trouble with music playback – an iPhone 4 stopped working with the stereo on one trip and we had to turn the car off, sit for a bit, and power on again.

When the Challenger just doesn’t perform as well as its Ford or Chevy competitors but costs more, you might wonder – who is the target market? For starters, it’s anyone who appreciates the classic design. Maybe it’s a car you even drove back in the day. A second prime customer: those who want to use the measurement tools, which are located right near the speedometer. We had a blast using them to test 0-to-60 acceleration, braking distance, and a quarter mile test. And there is the raw engine spec. The Challenger has more power and more torque, and if you want to make a statement in your neighborhood about who has the most muscle, this is the muscle car for you.

Also make sure to check out our 2011 Dodge Challenger STR8 photo gallery.

John Brandon
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Archer’s flying taxis head to LA for the 2028 Olympics
archer air taxi la28 inglewood aerial a final

Remember the buzz about flying taxis zipping through Paris for the 2024 Olympics? That sci-fi fantasy never got off the ground —Germany’s Volocopter dream was denied certification, leaving fans staring at the same old ground traffic. But now, the skies are opening again for a second shot at glory—this time over Los Angeles.
Archer Aviation, the California-based electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) company, has been named the exclusive air taxi provider for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic and Paralympic Games.
Archer’s Midnight aircraft, a piloted electric air taxi designed to carry four passengers, will be whisking around VIPs, fans, and stakeholders between venues and key locations like LAX, Hollywood, Santa Monica, and even Orange County. Think 10-20 minute flights that skip the infamous LA gridlock and land you right where the action is—on the roof, basically.
“We want to transform the way people get around Los Angeles and leave a legacy that shapes the future of transportation in America. There’s no better time to do that than during the LA28 Games,” said Adam Goldstein, CEO and founder of Archer Aviation.
And Midnight isn’t just a pretty rotor. It’s a whisper-quiet, emission-light aircraft with 12 rotors and a redundant, airline-level safety design.
What’s more, Archer and LA28 are working together to electrify vertiport hubs around the city—think futuristic sky stations—to serve not only Games-time needs but also to plant seeds for a post-Olympic air mobility network.
The air mobility market has been fast developing over the past few years, featuring the likes of Hyundai partnership with China’s XPeng HT Aero and Toyota's backing of Joby Aviation, a U.S. venture. Joby bought Uber Elevate in 2020, hoping to someday pair its air taxis with Uber’s ride-hailing app.
Archer, for its part, has been busy building a strategic partnership with United Airlines, which has already placed orders for the aircraft and is helping with logistics to integrate air taxis into airport-to-downtown travel. More than a demo for the cameras, the LA28 partnership will showcase urban air travel for real-world daily use, starting with one of the most high-profile events on Earth.
After raising false hopes in Paris, the air taxi dream is aiming for liftoff in LA—and this time, it might just stick the landing.

Read more
Electric Muscle Misfire? Dodge Pulls Charger Daytona R/T from 2026 Lineup
electric muscle misfire dodge pulls charger daytona r t from 2026 lineup all new

The Dodge Charger Daytona R/T, once hailed as the vanguard of Dodge’s electric muscle car future, is being dropped for the 2026 model year.
According to a report from MoparInsiders, the Scat Pack variant will now lead the Daytona lineup, marking a significant pivot in Stellantis’ EV strategy.
Originally introduced with bold ambitions, the Charger Daytona R/T was designed to offer an accessible gateway into electric performance. With its 456-horsepower dual-motor setup and optional 509-horsepower Direct Connection stage kit, it seemed poised to excite both muscle car fans and EV newcomers. However, market realities have painted a different picture.
Industry and media reports highlight the core issue: buyers just weren’t biting. Despite its impressive specs and nostalgic design cues, the R/T struggled to justify its price tag, starting near $60,000. At that level, buyers expected either more performance or more premium features. Without strong sales traction, Dodge made the tough call to shelve the R/T variant for 2026, opting instead to focus on trims that resonate better with customers.
As we reported in December, the Charger EV was launched with an off-beat marketing message to “save the planet from self-driving sleep pods.” The goal was to retain Dodge’s brand identity—muscle, aggression, and driver engagement—even in the electric era. The Charger Daytona R/T was supposed to be the perfect balance of price and performance, but it seems the target audience wasn’t ready to make that leap at that price.
Importantly, this doesn’t spell the end of the Charger Daytona altogether. Higher-performance models like the Scat Pack and Banshee are still in the pipeline and, interestingly, are being adjusted for price competitiveness. Several trims are reportedly seeing price cuts, suggesting Stellantis is serious about making these vehicles more appealing and accessible.
For enthusiasts, the takeaway is clear: the electric muscle car isn’t going anywhere, but automakers are still figuring out how to sell it. The demise of the R/T is less a failure and more a recalibration—proof that even the boldest plans need to stay flexible in the face of consumer demand.

Read more
The all-electric Cadillac Vistiq makes the Escalade redundant
2026 Cadillac Vistiq front-quarter view.

Cadillac wants a full lineup of electric vehicles, and it’s nearly there. It has a standard crossover SUV (the Lyriq), an entry-level model (the Optiq), an electric version of its flagship Escalade (the Escalade IQ), and even a baroque showpiece (the Celestiq). But something’s missing.

For a modern luxury brand, a midsize three-row crossover is key. Customers for whom a Toyota Highlander is too déclassé need something to take their kids to lacrosse practice, but may not want something as big as an Escalade. This isn’t the most exciting design brief, and that’s reflected in the gasoline Cadillac XT6, which has always felt like nothing more than a placeholder. Its new electric counterpart, the 2026 Cadillac Vistiq, is anything but.

Read more