Skip to main content

Stickshift showdown: Porsche 911 Carrera vs. Audi R8

Maybe I had a little extra karma to spare. Maybe the gods looked down on me and smiled. Maybe I’m just one lucky son of a gun.

Either way, I’ve spent the last two weeks with two very stripped-down sports cars: the 2014 Porsche 911 and the 2014 Audi R8. Both cars arrived in their most basic forms: manual transmissions, base engines, and very, very few optional extras.

This got me to thinking, “Which of these really is the better sports car at its core?”

I’ve driven the wildest versions of the cars already – Audi’s R8 V10 Plus at nearly $200,000, and the Porsche 911 Turbo S, which was optioned into the same territory – and both cars were legitimate supercars with totally different personalities.

But what happens when you take away all of the carbon ceramic brakes and dual-clutch automatics? The extra cylinders and forced induction? The high-end sound systems and rare breed leathers? Neither of these cars came with radar cruise control, keyless start, or even a sunroof.

I sought out to determine which set of enthusiasts was right: The Classic Collectors or the Techie Neophytes.

Exterior design

This one is totally subjective, so I’ll just start by saying that I love the mostly-unchanged-since-the-1960s lines on the Porsche, but the Audi really gets me all hot and bothered.

Based on the cars that orbited me on highway, with drivers trying their best to snap photos without crashing, my guess is that the R8’s ultra-modern design won over the hearts of Atlantans, too.

However, I polled my friends only to find a very different result. Sure, the Audi R8 had guys crawling all over it, drooling over the glass engine cover, and fawning over the LED headlights. That wasn’t enough, though.

The gents who knew something about cars talked about how the Audi had started to age and look long in the tooth. Two of the women in my life (including my mother) mentioned that the R8 looks like a Hot Wheels toy, rather than a car they’d want to drive every day. Somehow, the R8 has come across as too trendy, and while it would be fun to own today; marrying its design wasn’t something most folks wanted to do for the long haul.

On the other hand, the 911’s understated looks earned unanimous praise across the board. However, it was a praise steeped in household knowledge of the brand and long-earned respect, rather than some of the wild excitement we earned with the Audi.

No, I don’t think anyone noticed me on the highway in this car; there are just too many on the road, and it’s hard for folks to differentiate between models. But that inability to tell the difference between cars was a selling point to my friends, since they felt like this base 911 would likely look as cool as a brand new Porsche in 15 years.

Admittedly, no one thought the Porsche was worth its $100,000 price tag, and most thought the Audi cost significantly more than it did. That didn’t stop the Porsche from becoming the darling of the group.

Winner: Porsche 911

Interiors

In the past Porsche has been known for its driver-centric interiors and relatively crappy fit and finish, giving the brand a reputation for sports cars, rather than luxury machines. That’s shifted dramatically since the debut of the Panamera and its influence on the rest of the Porsche lineup – for better, not worse.

On the flip side, just about any Audi’s best quality will likely be its interior. The brand uses high-grade materials and simple, intuitive technology to really amplify the travel experience for driver and passengers alike, so you’d think Audi would have this one in the bag.

And it does.

Granted, this particular Audi R8 came with a $6,500 leather package upgrade, so it’s hard to say if a truly base R8 would’ve sized up against the 911. The Porsche had soft-touch materials throughout and nice enough leather. Even then, it didn’t feel much nicer inside than a BMW 4 Series. The 911 does come standard with a full-color, multi-function screen in the gauge cluster that’s especially useful, but the rest was pretty standard issue.

The R8 came with black, quilted leather and white contrasting stitching, and that leather covered every surface. There were fewer buttons inside, too, making the Audi a more straightforward driving experience. I’ll admit that I missed the convenient storage of the 911’s rear seat (because you’re fitting people back there, I promise), but the R8 just felt cozier and better-built inside – something that I hope the engineers at Porsche learn as they settle into their VW Group brand experience.

Winner: Audi R8

Standard Features

It’s pretty obvious where Porsche focuses its attention when you look at a car’s window sticker. You’ll find more bullets in the 911’s engine description than anywhere else. That’s because Porsche is notorious for nickel-and-diming its customers for each individual option on the list. Fancy seats? Sure, that’s $2,320. Wheels that don’t look undersized? Great, that’s another $3,000. Oh, you want your key to match your paintjob? Awesome, that’s another $300.

With that in mind, you can customize a 911 to the end of the world and back, making your car unique among other Porsches on the road today. What you get in the base $84,300 price is pretty simple, and it’s easy to add $50k in options from here: 

  • A 3.4-liter, horizontally-opposed six-cylinder engine
  • A seven-speed manual transmission
  • 19-inch wheels (that look too small)
  • Xenon headlights
  • Navigation
  • Bluetooth (but no steering wheel controls)
  • Warm and fuzzies for finally buying the Porsche you wanted as a kid

Audi offers similar standard features, albeit with a few more conveniences. That might sound like a sham, since the R8 starts at $115,000, but since the average Porsche buyer adds almost half of the car’s value in options to the sticker price, they tend come out pretty evenly. The base R8 comes with:

  • A 4.2-liter V8
  • A six-speed manual transmission with a sexy gated shifter
  • 19-inch wheels (that don’t look to small for the car)
  • LED headlights
  • Navigation and Bluetooth (with steering wheel controls)
  • Tony Stark and/or rapper status upon purchase

Winner: Tie

Performance

Performance really is the category that should separate good sports cars from fantastic sports cars, but that’s also the category that really differentiates the Porsche 911 from the Audi R8.

The Porsche is a rear-engine, rear-drive absolutely brilliant machine. In its most basic form, its engine produces 350 horsepower and only 287 pound-feet of torque, which really isn’t all that impressive.

However, the engine is one of the most refined you can buy at any price, and it’s just enough to make driving the 911 fun at any speed. There are larger engines and turbocharged models with all-wheel drive as you climb in price, but I found the stripped 911 to be engaging and delightful the entire time.

The suspension was exceptionally responsive and the tires were surprisingly grippy under hard corners. The Porsche fits like a glove, like an extension of your body, as you drive around town and into the countryside. And I can’t say better things about the manual transmission in the 911. It’s simply one of the easiest, most precise manuals available at any price.

Jumping into the Audi is a different experience altogether. Its V8 produces 430 horsepower, and it feels faster off the line. That’s partly in thanks to its standard Quattro all-wheel-drive system, which allows you enter and exit corners more aggressively, and even drive in inclement weather … if you’re feeling brave with your paint.

Similar to the 911, the Audi is very easy to drive and feels smaller on the road than it actually is. However, that handsome gated shifter also turns out to be one of my few complaints about the car. It sounds cool as you clink from gear to gear, but the throws are longer between those gears, and each gate takes longer to access than it does in the Porsche.

If you’re looking to drag the two cars, they’ll hit 60 miles per hour in the same amount of time (4.6 seconds), so it’ll mostly come down to whether you prefer the riding-on-rails feeling that comes with Quattro, or the exacting, driftable rear-wheel-drive dynamics that come with the Porsche.

Winner: Tie

Conclusion

You’d think we’d break even here with a win for each and two ties, but I’m going to break some hearts and choose a personal favorite. The 2014 Audi R8 has the deadly looks, handsome interior, and monstrous traction that many car enthusiasts are going to enjoy, and I think those folks should certainly consider keeping it on the short list.

However, I want to believe that such edgy design has a shorter shelf life than classic lines. And there are times when the Audi just feels too planted for my taste; I like to know a car’s limits. And, honestly, never reached them with the R8.

That said, the Porsche 911 would be the car I’d choose tomorrow, and I could be made happy with a nearly stock model, too. Chances are, though, I’d find my own $50,000 in options to layer onto the price tag. Then it would cost as much as any nicely equipped R8 on the market, too.

There’s a different kind of cool factor that comes with Porsche ownership. Even a $200,000 911 looks more subdued than a stripped R8, but I think that’s part of the magic of it.

Both cars come standard with all the sporting prowess you need to enjoy yourself behind the wheel, but the Porsche ­– with it’s rear-wheel drive and killer manual transmission – stole my heart. 

Davis Adams
Former Contributor
Whether you're talking about gadgets or cars, Davis always seems to prefer "next year's models." He's a neophile to the core…
Electric Muscle Misfire? Dodge Pulls Charger Daytona R/T from 2026 Lineup
electric muscle misfire dodge pulls charger daytona r t from 2026 lineup all new

The Dodge Charger Daytona R/T, once hailed as the vanguard of Dodge’s electric muscle car future, is being dropped for the 2026 model year.
According to a report from MoparInsiders, the Scat Pack variant will now lead the Daytona lineup, marking a significant pivot in Stellantis’ EV strategy.
Originally introduced with bold ambitions, the Charger Daytona R/T was designed to offer an accessible gateway into electric performance. With its 456-horsepower dual-motor setup and optional 509-horsepower Direct Connection stage kit, it seemed poised to excite both muscle car fans and EV newcomers. However, market realities have painted a different picture.
Industry and media reports highlight the core issue: buyers just weren’t biting. Despite its impressive specs and nostalgic design cues, the R/T struggled to justify its price tag, starting near $60,000. At that level, buyers expected either more performance or more premium features. Without strong sales traction, Dodge made the tough call to shelve the R/T variant for 2026, opting instead to focus on trims that resonate better with customers.
As we reported in December, the Charger EV was launched with an off-beat marketing message to “save the planet from self-driving sleep pods.” The goal was to retain Dodge’s brand identity—muscle, aggression, and driver engagement—even in the electric era. The Charger Daytona R/T was supposed to be the perfect balance of price and performance, but it seems the target audience wasn’t ready to make that leap at that price.
Importantly, this doesn’t spell the end of the Charger Daytona altogether. Higher-performance models like the Scat Pack and Banshee are still in the pipeline and, interestingly, are being adjusted for price competitiveness. Several trims are reportedly seeing price cuts, suggesting Stellantis is serious about making these vehicles more appealing and accessible.
For enthusiasts, the takeaway is clear: the electric muscle car isn’t going anywhere, but automakers are still figuring out how to sell it. The demise of the R/T is less a failure and more a recalibration—proof that even the boldest plans need to stay flexible in the face of consumer demand.

Read more
The all-electric Cadillac Vistiq makes the Escalade redundant
2026 Cadillac Vistiq front-quarter view.

Cadillac wants a full lineup of electric vehicles, and it’s nearly there. It has a standard crossover SUV (the Lyriq), an entry-level model (the Optiq), an electric version of its flagship Escalade (the Escalade IQ), and even a baroque showpiece (the Celestiq). But something’s missing.

For a modern luxury brand, a midsize three-row crossover is key. Customers for whom a Toyota Highlander is too déclassé need something to take their kids to lacrosse practice, but may not want something as big as an Escalade. This isn’t the most exciting design brief, and that’s reflected in the gasoline Cadillac XT6, which has always felt like nothing more than a placeholder. Its new electric counterpart, the 2026 Cadillac Vistiq, is anything but.

Read more
With the Ioniq 9, Hyundai struggles to clear its own high bar
2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 front quarter view.

Hyundai has used the clean-sheet nature of electric powertrains to make new vehicles radically different from its internal-combustion models, but what happens when the best thing a new car can be is ordinary? The 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 is a three-row SUV that, to succeed, needs to prioritize space and an effortless ownership experience over radical styling or sports-car driving dynamics. That doesn’t leave much room for creativity, but Hyundai has done its best by giving the Ioniq 9 futuristic styling combined with the proven E-GMP dedicated EV platform from its other Ioniq models and the Kia EV9.  The enthusiastic response to the EV9, from Hyundai’s sibling brand, shows why, despite having two gasoline three-row SUVs in its lineup already, Hyundai needed an all-electric one as well.

Another daring design from Hyundai

Read more