Skip to main content

2015 Nissan GT-R review

Ferrari performance for half the price? Yup, but Nissan's GT-R has a catch

2015 Nissan GT-R
2015 Nissan GT-R
MSRP $101,770.00
“Sure, the GT-R is a performance competitor to the likes of Ferrari and Lamborghini. But, ignoring performance, the reason for the price difference between Godzilla and its competitors becomes quickly and painfully clear.”
  • Straight-line acceleration
  • Cornering
  • Fade-free braking
  • Crisp but forgiving transmission
  • Basic Nissan interior trim
  • Virtually zero sound deadening
  • Brutal suspension

When I first drove the GT-R last year, I was a bit horrified by it. I found it loud, hard to control, and wholly uncouth. It did not at all behave how I expected a $100,000 supercar to perform – save the 0 to 60 times, of course.

Over the last year, however, I’ve driven a great deal of the world’s supercar offerings, from the Aventador to the 458 Spider. Despite costing anywhere between three to four times more than the GT-R, I found these cars not to be four-times more refined or luxurious.

It’s with this very really, very stirring realization in my mind that I once again climbed behind the wheel of the GT-R – this time a 2015 – to see if its wiles could once and for all win me over.


Let me say straight away that the GT-R drives very well indeed. It’s fast and it handles incredibly confidently without even a soupçon of body roll. The robust all-wheel drive system, which first sends the torque to the rear before sending up to 50 percent back to the front, is a beacon of traction mastery.

The hand-built, twin-turbo 3.8-liter V6, which produces around 545 horsepower and 463 pound-feet of torque, too, deserves kudos, as its power delivery rivals eight- and 10-cylinder engines.

2015 Nissan GT-R
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The GT-R six-speed dual-clutch transmission, too, is rave worthy. It can handle tectonic levels of torque, while also proving both smooth when it needs to be at cruising speeds, and also very, very crisp at full-throttle change-ups.

Remove that powertrain from its steel sledge, however, forget it exists, and inspect the rest of the vehicle, and I suspect a driver’s elation with the GT-R might quickly deteriorate.

Driving master

Before we get to the deterioration, let’s talk the behind-the-wheel experience. On a twisty, deserted road, the GT-R is one of the most enlivening vehicles I’ve ever encountered.

At a tap of the throttle, passengers’ heads are ripped back with a force of a thousand exploding suns. The Recaro sport seats cling to front-row occupants torsos like a baby gorilla clinging to its mother. Braking, too, is just as forceful. Steering is crisp and perfectly direct. Outward visibility is good.

As a driver’s car, the GT-R is very, very pleasing. It’s just when it’s not being used as a track monster that it’s a bit less pleasant.

Going Rogue

Drop behind the wheel of the GT-R and a very disjointed cabin immediately greets the driver. The red-accented steering wheel boasts a big, shiny “GT-R” logo and the dash offers accents of carbon fiber. Aside from those supercar-like accouterments, however, the GT-R’s cabin is pretty darn plebian – and certainly not in line with its performance brethren.

On a twisty, deserted road, the GT-R is one of the most enlivening vehicles I’ve ever encountered.

Seemingly every one of the dash buttons and trim bits are the same as any other Nissan – even the bargain Rogue crossover. Ostensibly, I understand why Nissan did this. In order to save money, it turned to its extensive parts bin to finish off the GT-R, rather than create things from scratch.

This is fine, say, in the 370Z NISMO, which only costs $41,990. For that money, buyers don’t quite expect refinement. The GT-R Black I tested, however, clocked in at $113,400. And once a manufacturer cracks $100,000, no matter how good the drivetrain, the interior better step up its game.

I could be – and fairly – accused of being pedantic, if the dash buttons and window switches were my only concern with the blisteringly fast GT-R. Sadly, however, they’re not. No, on the open road, when not hammering the royal snot out of the car, it’s an eardrum-shattering and twitchy – albeit relatively inexpensive – supercar.

Just like the 370Z NISMO, presumably in order to save weight, Nissan designers skimped on sound deadening. Again, this might be acceptable for 40 grand. At 110, it’s not. On free- and highways with rougher road surfaces, drivers and passengers will barely be able to hear themselves think inside the GT-R, let alone hold a conversation without going hoarse.

On roads with even a slight rut, the GT-R twitches around, causing the driver to constantly wrestle the steering wheel, just in order to keep the car in a straight line.

Adding insult to a driver’s already sore shoulders and ears, the solid suspension kicks occupants in the spine at the first encounter of a roadway imperfection – even in normal, non Sport mode.

Then there’s the industrial sounds of the transmission and all-wheel drive system that permeate the cabin at all speeds and conditions. Everyone I took for a drive in the GT-R was worried – based upon the sounds coming from underneath – the car was about to break. It’s not exactly the experience I suspect most buyers in this price range are expecting.


I understand some of you might now be shouting at your computer screen, furious with my complaints. If you are, I suspect you’ve never driven a GT-R. Simply gauging a car based upon its spec sheet misses most of the point.

Yes, the GT-R is faster than, say, an Audi R8. But so what?

Yes, the GT-R is faster than, say, an Audi R8. But so what? Are you ever going to drive it like that? No, no you’re not.

Sure, you might drive it hard a couple times a week. But unless you plan to drive it to the fringes of sanity on the Nurburgring, you’re never going to wring all the worth out of a $110,000 car that might drive you insane on a daily basis.

Honestly, if it were my cash, I’d buy either a base Audi R8 for $115,900 or a Porsche 911 S with a sport exhaust for $102,980. No, neither is as fast, but the R8 gives you more attention-grabbing good looks than the GT-R and the 911 offers far, far, far more refinement.

All of that said, I will admit the GT-R is an impressive competitor – at full tilt – to $260,000 Italian supercars, for less than half the price. What savings there are between the GT-R and Ferraris and Lamborghinis, though, are readily and painfully apparent. The 458, for example, is far more refined on the freeway and the Huracan never tries to rip its steering wheel from your hands.

So, yes, you can get a car nearly as uproarious as a Ferrari for around a third the price. Do you want to, though? I am not so sure.


  • Straight-line acceleration
  • Cornering
  • Fade-free braking
  • Crisp but forgiving transmission


  • Basic Nissan interior trim
  • Virtually zero sound deadening
  • Brutal suspension

Editors' Recommendations

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Nissan’s Z goes back to the future with retro styling, modern tech
Rear three quarter view of the 2023 Nissan Z.

No car has tested the maxim “if it’s not broken, don’t fix it” like the Nissan 370Z. The two-seat sports car has had one of the longest production runs of any vehicle in recent memory. It was unveiled in late 2008, and has soldiered on with only minor updates since then. Even in old age, the 370Z wasn’t a bad car, but Nissan needed to keep pace with modern tech to prevent one of its most hallowed nameplates from getting stale.

Unveiled in New York City today, and scheduled to go on sale in the United States in spring 2022, the 2023 Nissan Z (the numerical prefix has been dropped) inherits a legacy that goes back over 50 years. The new Z is the successor not only to the 370Z, but also to the Datsun 240Z, which became an instant classic when it was unveiled in the Big Apple in 1969.

Read more
2022 Nissan Pathfinder first drive review: More tech, more toughness
Front-three quarter view of the 2022 Nissan Pathfinder.

It’s hard to think of a better name for an SUV than Pathfinder. It has adventure and military connotations (pathfinder paratroopers were the first American soldiers to put boots on the ground during the World War II D-Day landings) and was also very appropriate for the original Nissan Pathfinder. When it launched in the 1980s, the Pathfinder was one of the first modern SUVs, taking the auto industry down a new path.

Fast forward three decades, though, and the new 2022 Nissan Pathfinder is no longer a trendsetter. Three-row family SUVs like this redesigned model are common now, with vehicles like the Ford Explorer, Honda Pilot, Hyundai Palisade and Kia Telluride twins, Subaru Ascent, Toyota Highlander, and Volkswagen Atlas crowding school parking lots.

Read more
2022 Audi e-tron GT first drive review: This slot car needs no track
Audi e-tron GT front angle

Audi’s e-tron nameplate started life as a shrunken, R8-bodied concept that broke cover at the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show. The all-electric supercar touted impressive tech for the time, including four electric motors, a 42-kWh battery, 156-mile range, and regenerative braking. But it was a full decade from the e-tron’s conceptual debut to Audi’s 2019 e-tron, its first series-production all-electric. In that time, pure EVs moved from novelty to mainstream, and Audi was no longer an alternative energy trendsetter. Now the German automaker is moving quickly to recover lost ground.

By the end of this year, Audi’s two-car EV lineup will swell to five -- the most exciting being a four-door coupe dubbed e-Tron GT. With prices starting at $99,900 (before factoring in a $7,500 federal tax credit), the e-tron GT will vie for Tesla’s Model S market share alongside its platform-mate, the Porsche Taycan. We spent a couple of hours of quality time with Audi’s standard e-tron GT before sliding behind the wheel of the hotter, pricier RS model for a quick tour of the Malibu canyons.
Design and Interior
On paper, it seems foolish for Volkswagen Auto Group to allow both Porsche and Audi to occupy the same, still-niche segment, but a visual comparison proves the two EVs are aiming for different buyers.

Read more